The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aberrant glycosylation associated with enzymes as cancer biomarkers
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: One of the new roles for enzymes in personalized medicine builds on a rational approach to cancer biomarker discovery using enzyme-associated aberrant glycosylation. A hallmark of cancer, aberrant glycosylation is associated with differential expressions of enzymes such as glycosyltransferase and glycosidases. The aberrant expressions of the enzymes in turn cause cancer cells to produce glycoproteins with specific cancer-associated aberrations in glycan structures. CONTENT: In this review we provide examples of cancer biomarker discovery using aberrant glycosylation in three areas. First, changes in glycosylation machinery such as glycosyltransferases/glycosidases could be used as cancer biomarkers. Second, most of the clinically useful cancer biomarkers are glycoproteins. Discovery of specific cancer-associated aberrations in glycan structures of these existing biomarkers could improve their cancer specificity, such as the discovery of AFP-L3, fucosylated glycoforms of AFP. Third, cancer-associated aberrations in glycan structures provide a compelling rationale for discovering new biomarkers using glycomic and glycoproteomic technologies. SUMMARY: As a hallmark of cancer, aberrant glycosylation allows for the rational design of biomarker discovery efforts. But more important, we need to translate these biomarkers from discovery to clinical diagnostics using good strategies, such as the lessons learned from translating the biomarkers discovered using proteomic technologies to OVA 1, the first FDA-cleared In Vitro Diagnostic Multivariate Index Assay (IVDMIA). These lessons, providing important guidance in current efforts in biomarker discovery and translation, are applicable to the discovery of aberrant glycosylation associated with enzymes as cancer biomarkers as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Suppression of tumor growth and metastasis in Mgat5-deficient mice
Granovsky, M., Fata, J., Pawling, J., Muller, W. J., Khokha, R., & Dennis, J. W. (2000) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/73163 · Cited by 569
Glycoforms of CA125 antigen as a possible cancer marker
Jankovic, M. M., & Milutinovic, B. S. (2008) · Cancer Biomarkers · doi:10.3233/cbm-2008-4104 · Cited by 59
Cited by
Recent progresses in small-molecule enzymatic fluorescent probes for cancer imaging
Liu, H.-W., Chen, L., Xu, C., Li, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, X.-B., & Tan, W. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00862g · Cited by 948
Hallmarks of glycosylation in cancer
Munkley, J., & Elliott, D. J. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.8155 · Cited by 521
Mechanisms of disease: The human N-glycome
Lauc, G., Pezer, M., Rudan, I., & Campbell, H. (2016) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.10.016 · Cited by 184
The Cosmc connection to the Tn antigen in cancer
Ju, T., Aryal, R. P., Kudelka, M. R., Wang, Y., & Cummings, R. D. (2014) · Cancer Biomarkers · doi:10.3233/cbm-130375 · Cited by 153
Immunological Evaluation of Recent MUC1 Glycopeptide Cancer Vaccines
Hossain, M., & Wall, K. (2016) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines4030025 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Meany, D. L., & Chan, D. W.
- Venue
- Clinical Proteomics
- Published
- 2011-06-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-7
- ISSN
- 1542-6416 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-0275
- OpenAlex
- W2154438952
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aberrant glycosylation associated with enzymes as cancer biomarkers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1559-0275-8-7
- The paper
- Meany, D. L., & Chan, D. W. (2011). Aberrant glycosylation associated with enzymes as cancer biomarkers. Clinical Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1559-0275-8-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.