The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey on biometric cryptosystems and cancelable biometrics
Open accessAbstract
Form a privacy perspective most concerns against the common use of biometrics arise from the storage and misuse of biometric data. Biometric cryptosystems and cancelable biometrics represent emerging technologies of biometric template protection addressing these concerns and improving public confidence and acceptance of biometrics. In addition, biometric cryptosystems provide mechanisms for biometric-dependent key-release. In the last years a significant amount of approaches to both technologies have been published. A comprehensive survey of biometric cryptosystems and cancelable biometrics is presented. State-of-the-art approaches are reviewed based on which an in-depth discussion and an outlook to future prospects are given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2008) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71041-9 · Cited by 1,406
Cancellable biometrics and annotations on biohash
Teoh, A. B. J., Kuan, Y. W., & Lee, S. (2008) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2007.12.002 · Cited by 213
Cited by
A survey on essential components of a self-sovereign identity
Mühle, A., Grüner, A., Gayvoronskaya, T., & Meinel, C. (2018) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2018.10.002 · Cited by 483
Multi-Factor Authentication: A Survey
Ometov, A., Bezzateev, S., Mäkitalo, N., Andreev, S., Mikkonen, T., & Koucheryavy, Y. (2018) · Cryptography · doi:10.3390/cryptography2010001 · Cited by 434
Cancelable Biometrics: A review
Patel, V. M., Ratha, N. K., & Chellappa, R. (2015) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2015.2434151 · Cited by 419
Biometric Template Protection: Bridging the performance gap between theory and practice
Nandakumar, K., & Jain, A. K. (2015) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2015.2427849 · Cited by 322
Blockchain Technology the Identity Management and Authentication Service Disruptor: A Survey
Lim, S. Y., Tankam Fotsing, P., Almasri, A., Musa, O., Mat Kiah, M. L., Ang, T. F., & Ismail, R. (2018) · International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.18517/ijaseit.8.4-2.6838 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Rathgeb, C., & Uhl, A.
- Venue
- EURASIP Journal on Information Security
- Published
- 2011-09-23
- Volume
- 2011
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1687-4161 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-417X
- OpenAlex
- W2129905915
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 49.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey on biometric cryptosystems and cancelable biometrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1687-417x-2011-3
- The paper
- Rathgeb, C., & Uhl, A. (2011). A survey on biometric cryptosystems and cancelable biometrics. EURASIP Journal on Information Security. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-417x-2011-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
