Cited by 11Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityHandwritten Text Recognition TechniquesDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Multifunctional Reading Assistant for the Visually Impaired

Open access
Mancas-Thillou, Céline, Ferreira, Silvio, Demeyer, Jonathan, Minetti, Christophe, Gosselin, Bernard·2007·EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1687-5281-2007-064295

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Mancas-Thillou, C., Ferreira, S., Demeyer, J., Minetti, C., & Gosselin, B.
Venue
EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing
Published
2007
Volume
2007
Issue
1
Pages
064295
ISSN
  • 1687-5176 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-5281
OpenAlex
W4249805700
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
visually impaired people, assistive technology, text accessibility, low vision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review