The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe
Open accessAbstract
Background: A central question in the evolutionary diversification of large, widespread, mobile mammals is how substantial differentiation can arise, particularly in the absence of topographic or habitat barriers to dispersal. All extant giraffes ( Giraffa camelopardalis ) are currently considered to represent a single species classified into multiple subspecies. However, geographic variation in traits such as pelage pattern is clearly evident across the range in sub-Saharan Africa and abrupt transition zones between different pelage types are typically not associated with extrinsic barriers to gene flow, suggesting reproductive isolation. Results: By analyzing mitochondrial DNA sequences and nuclear microsatellite loci, we show that there are at least six genealogically distinct lineages of giraffe in Africa, with little evidence of interbreeding between them. Some of these lineages appear to be maintained in the absence of contemporary barriers to gene flow, possibly by differences in reproductive timing or pelage-based assortative mating, suggesting that populations usually recognized as subspecies have a long history of reproductive isolation. Further, five of the six putative lineages also contain genetically discrete populations, yielding at least 11 genetically distinct populations. Conclusion: Such extreme genetic subdivision within a large vertebrate with high dispersal capabilities is unprecedented and exceeds that of any other large African mammal. Our results have significant implications for giraffe conservation, and imply separate in situ and ex situ management, not only of pelage morphs, but also of local populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analyzing Tables of Statistical Tests
Rice, W. R. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2409177 · Cited by 14,571
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
Cited by
Integration of DNA barcoding into an ongoing inventory of complex tropical biodiversity
JANZEN, D. H., HALLWACHS, W., BLANDIN, P., BURNS, J. M., CADIOU, J., CHACON, I., DAPKEY, T., DEANS, A. R., EPSTEIN, M. E., ESPINOZA, B., et al. (2009) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02628.x · Cited by 360
Whole-genome analysis of giraffe supports four distinct species
Coimbra, R. T. F., Winter, S., Kumar, V., Koepfli, K.-P., Gooley, R. M., Dobrynin, P., Fennessy, J., & Janke, A. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.033 · Cited by 102
Self-citationLimited introgression supports division of giraffe into four species
Winter, S., Fennessy, J., & Janke, A. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.4490 · Cited by 66
Impacts of taxonomic inertia for the conservation ofAfrican ungulate diversity: an overview
Gippoliti, S., Cotterill, F. P. D., Zinner, D., & Groves, C. P. (2018) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12335 · Cited by 63
Petzold, A., & Hassanin, A. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217956 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, D. M., Brenneman, R. A., Koepfli, K.-P., Pollinger, J. P., Milá, B., Georgiadis, N. J., Louis, E. E., Grether, G. F., Jacobs, D. K., & Wayne, R. K.
- Venue
- BMC Biology
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-57
- ISSN
- 1741-7007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109136396
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1741-7007-5-57
- The paper
- Brown, D. M., Brenneman, R. A., Koepfli, K.-P., Pollinger, J. P., Milá, B., Georgiadis, N. J., Louis, E. E., Grether, G. F., Jacobs, D. K., & Wayne, R. K. (2007). Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe. BMC Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-5-57
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.