The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Duplicate gene expression in allopolyploid Gossypiumreveals two temporally distinct phases of expression evolution
Open accessAbstract
Background: Polyploidy has played a prominent role in shaping the genomic architecture of the angiosperms. Through allopolyploidization, several modern Gossypium(cotton) species contain two divergent, although largely redundant genomes. Owing to this redundancy, these genomes can play host to an array of evolutionary processes that act on duplicate genes. Results: We compared homoeolog (genes duplicated by polyploidy) contributions to the transcriptome of a natural allopolyploid and a synthetic interspecific F 1 hybrid, both derived from a merger between diploid species from the Gossypium A-genome and D-genome groups. Relative levels of A- and D-genome contributions to the petal transcriptome were determined for 1,383 gene pairs. This comparison permitted partitioning of homoeolog expression biases into those arising from genomic merger and those resulting from polyploidy. Within allopolyploid Gossypium, approximately 24% of the genes with biased (unequal contributions from the two homoeologous copies) expression patterns are inferred to have arisen as a consequence of genomic merger, indicating that a substantial fraction of homoeolog expression biases occur instantaneously with hybridization. The remaining 76% of biased homoeologs reflect long-term evolutionary forces, such as duplicate gene neofunctionalization and subfunctionalization. Finally, we observed a greater number of genes biased toward the paternal D-genome and that expression biases have tended to increases during allopolyploid evolution. Conclusion: Our results indicate that allopolyploidization entails significant homoeolog expression modulation, both immediately as a consequence of genomic merger, and secondarily as a result of long-term evolutionary transformations in duplicate gene expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Conesa, A., Götz, S., García-Gómez, J. M., Terol, J., Talón, M., & Robles, M. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610 · Cited by 11,495
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Ohno, S. (1970) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3 · Cited by 7,833
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Preservation of Duplicate Genes by Complementary, Degenerative Mutations
Force, A., Lynch, M., Pickett, F. B., Amores, A., Yan, Y.-L., & Postlethwait, J. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/151.4.1531 · Cited by 3,529
Genome evolution in polyploids
Wendel, J. F. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006392424384 · Cited by 1,600
Self-citationUnravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events
Bowers, J. E., Chapman, B. A., Rong, J., & Paterson, A. H. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01521 · Cited by 1,599
Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Kellis, M., Birren, B. W., & Lander, E. S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02424 · Cited by 1,522
Cited by
Gene duplication and evolutionary novelty in plants
Flagel, L. E., & Wendel, J. F. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02923.x · Cited by 969
Self-citationYang, J., Liu, D., Wang, X., Ji, C., Cheng, F., Liu, B., Hu, Z., Chen, S., Pental, D., Ju, Y., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3657 · Cited by 580
Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis
Chen, Z. J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3503 · Cited by 531
Homoeolog expression bias and expression level dominance in allopolyploid cotton
Yoo, M.-J., Szadkowski, E., & Wendel, J. F. (2013) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2012.94 · Cited by 441
Self-citationDoubling down on genomes: Polyploidy and crop plants
Renny‐Byfield, S., & Wendel, J. F. (2014) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1400119 · Cited by 406
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Flagel, L., Udall, J., Nettleton, D., & Wendel, J.
- Venue
- BMC Biology
- Published
- 2008-04-16
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-16
- ISSN
- 1741-7007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008957609
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 24.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Duplicate gene expression in allopolyploid Gossypiumreveals two temporally distinct phases of expression evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1741-7007-6-16
- The paper
- Flagel, L., Udall, J., Nettleton, D., & Wendel, J. (2008). Duplicate gene expression in allopolyploid Gossypiumreveals two temporally distinct phases of expression evolution. BMC Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-6-16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.