Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of dimethyl fumarate on neuroprotection and immunomodulation

Open access
Albrecht, Philipp, Bouchachia, Imane, Goebels, Norbert, Henke, Nadine, Hofstetter, Harald H, Issberner, Andrea, Kovacs, Zsuzsa, Lewerenz, Jan, Lisak, Dmitrij, Maher, Pamela, Mausberg, Anne-Kathrin, Quasthoff, Kim, Zimmermann, Corinna, Hartung, Hans-Peter, Methner, Axel·2012·Journal of Neuroinflammation

Abstract

Background: Neuronal degeneration in multiple sclerosis has been linked to oxidative stress. Dimethyl fumarate is a promising novel oral therapeutic option shown to reduce disease activity and progression in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. These effects are presumed to originate from a combination of immunomodulatory and neuroprotective mechanisms. We aimed to clarify whether neuroprotective concentrations of dimethyl fumarate have immunomodulatory effects. Findings: We determined time- and concentration-dependent effects of dimethyl fumarate and its metabolite monomethyl fumarate on viability in a model of endogenous neuronal oxidative stress and clarified the mechanism of action by quantitating cellular glutathione content and recycling, nuclear translocation of transcription factors, and the expression of antioxidant genes. We compared this with changes in the cytokine profiles released by stimulated splenocytes measured by ELISPOT technology and analyzed the interactions between neuronal and immune cells and neuronal function and viability in cell death assays and multi-electrode arrays. Our observations show that dimethyl fumarate causes short-lived oxidative stress, which leads to increased levels and nuclear localization of the transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 and a subsequent increase in glutathione synthesis and recycling in neuronal cells. Concentrations that were cytoprotective in neuronal cells had no negative effects on viability of splenocytes but suppressed the production of proinflammatory cytokines in cultures from C57BL/6 and SJL mice and had no effects on neuronal activity in multi-electrode arrays. Conclusions: These results suggest that immunomodulatory concentrations of dimethyl fumarate can reduce oxidative stress without altering neuronal network activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1742-2094-9-163

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Albrecht, P., Bouchachia, I., Goebels, N., Henke, N., Hofstetter, H. H., Issberner, A., Kovacs, Z., Lewerenz, J., Lisak, D., Maher, P., Mausberg, A.-K., Quasthoff, K., Zimmermann, C., Hartung, H.-P., & Methner, A.
Venue
Journal of Neuroinflammation
Published
2012-07-07
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
163-163
ISSN
1742-2094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134242739
Cited by
227
References
1
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of dimethyl fumarate on neuroprotection and immunomodulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1742-2094-9-163
The paper
Albrecht, P., Bouchachia, I., Goebels, N., Henke, N., Hofstetter, H. H., Issberner, A., Kovacs, Z., Lewerenz, J., Lisak, D., Maher, P., Mausberg, A.-K., Quasthoff, K., Zimmermann, C., Hartung, H.-P., & Methner, A. (2012). Effects of dimethyl fumarate on neuroprotection and immunomodulation. Journal of Neuroinflammation. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-163

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.