The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Limits to modern contraceptive use among young women in developing countries: a systematic review of qualitative research
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Improving the reproductive health of young women in developing countries requires access to safe and effective methods of fertility control, but most rely on traditional rather than modern contraceptives such as condoms or oral/injectable hormonal methods. We conducted a systematic review of qualitative research to examine the limits to modern contraceptive use identified by young women in developing countries. Focusing on qualitative research allows the assessment of complex processes often missed in quantitative analyses. METHODS: Literature searches of 23 databases, including Medline, Embase and POPLINE(R), were conducted. Literature from 1970-2006 concerning the 11-24 years age group was included. Studies were critically appraised and meta-ethnography was used to synthesise the data. RESULTS: Of the 12 studies which met the inclusion criteria, seven met the quality criteria and are included in the synthesis (six from sub-Saharan Africa; one from South-East Asia). Sample sizes ranged from 16 to 149 young women (age range 13-19 years). Four of the studies were urban based, one was rural, one semi-rural, and one mixed (predominantly rural). Use of hormonal methods was limited by lack of knowledge, obstacles to access and concern over side effects, especially fear of infertility. Although often more accessible, and sometimes more attractive than hormonal methods, condom use was limited by association with disease and promiscuity, together with greater male control. As a result young women often relied on traditional methods or abortion. Although the review was limited to five countries and conditions are not homogenous for all young women in all developing countries, the overarching themes were common across different settings and contexts, supporting the potential transferability of interventions to improve reproductive health. CONCLUSION: Increasing modern contraceptive method use requires community-wide, multifaceted interventions and the combined provision of information, life skills, support and access to youth-friendly services. Interventions should aim to counter negative perceptions of modern contraceptive methods and the dual role of condoms for contraception and STI prevention should be exploited, despite the challenges involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1988) · doi:10.4135/9781412985000 · Cited by 2,723
Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
Barbour, R. S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115 · Cited by 2,613
Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,191
Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/135581960501000110 · Cited by 2,132
Family planning: the unfinished agenda
Cleland, J., Bernstein, S., Ezeh, A., Faundes, A., Glasier, A., & Innis, J. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69480-4 · Cited by 1,263
Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example
Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/135581902320432732 · Cited by 1,110
Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199708)20:4<365::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-e · Cited by 1,046
Popay, J., Rogers, A., & Williams, G. (1998) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239800800305 · Cited by 987
Sexual behaviour in context: a global perspective
Wellings, K., Collumbien, M., Slaymaker, E., Singh, S., Hodges, Z., Patel, D., & Bajos, N. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69479-8 · Cited by 933
Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., & Donovan, J. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00064-3 · Cited by 921
Cited by
Contraception for adolescents in low and middle income countries: needs, barriers, and access
Chandra-Mouli, V., McCarraher, D. R., Phillips, S. J., Williamson, N. E., & Hainsworth, G. (2014) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/1742-4755-11-1 · Cited by 687
Sedgh, G., & Hussain, R. (2014) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00382.x · Cited by 417
Ippoliti, N. B., & L’Engle, K. (2017) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/s12978-016-0276-z · Cited by 163
Shahabuddin, A. S. M., Nöstlinger, C., Delvaux, T., Sarker, M., Bardají, A., Brouwere, V. D., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157664 · Cited by 70
Tripney, J., Kwan, I., & Bird, K. S. (2013) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.014 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Williamson, L. M., Parkes, A., Wight, D., Petticrew, M., & Hart, G. J.
- Venue
- Reproductive Health
- Published
- 2009-02-19
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-3
- ISSN
- 1742-4755 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065677477
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limits to modern contraceptive use among young women in developing countries: a systematic review of qualitative research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1742-4755-6-3
- The paper
- Williamson, L. M., Parkes, A., Wight, D., Petticrew, M., & Hart, G. J. (2009). Limits to modern contraceptive use among young women in developing countries: a systematic review of qualitative research. Reproductive Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-6-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.