Functional morphology and integration of corvid skulls - a 3D geometric morphometric approach
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Sympatric corvid species have evolved differences in nesting, habitat choice, diet and foraging. Differences in the frequency with which corvid species use their repertoire of feeding techniques is expected to covary with bill-shape and with the frontal binocular field. Species that frequently probe are expected to have a relatively longer bill and more sidewise oriented orbits in contrast to species that frequently peck. We tested this prediction by analyzing computed tomography scans of skulls of six corvid species by means of three-dimensional geometric morphometrics. We (1) explored patterns of major variation using principal component analysis, (2) compared within and between species relationships of size and shape and (3) quantitatively compared patterns of morphological integration between bill and cranium by means of partial least squares (singular warp) analysis. RESULTS: Major shape variation occurs at the bill, in the orientation of orbits, in the position of the foramen magnum and in the angle between bill and cranium. The first principal component correlated positively with centroid-size, but within-species allometric relationships differed markedly. Major covariation between the bill and cranium lies in the difference in orbit orientation relative to bill-length and in the angle between bill and cranium. CONCLUSION: Corvid species show pronounced differences in skull shape, which covary with foraging mode. Increasing bill-length, bill-curvature and sidewise orientation of the eyes is associated with an increase in the observed frequency in probing (vice versa in pecking). Hence, the frequency of probing, bill-length, bill-curvature and sidewise orientation of the eyes is progressively increased from jackdaw, to Eurasian jay, to black-billed magpie, to hooded crow, to rook and to common raven (when feeding on carcasses is considered as probing). Our results on the morphological integration suggest that most of the covariation between bill and cranium is due to differences in the topography of the binocular fields and the projection of the bill-tip therein, indicating the importance of visual fields to the foraging ecology of corvids.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous analyses that found the avian cranium to be highly integrated were restricted to smaller clades or excluded large portions of the skull.
“This contrasts with previous analyses that have found the avian cranium to be highly integrated. However, these previous analyses have been restricted to analyzing smaller clades (10, 12) or have excluded large portions of the skull (9).”
From Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks
Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2992207 · Cited by 4,289 · see citing works
The evolutionary role of modularity and integration in the Hominoid cranium
Mitteroecker, P., & Bookstein, F. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00321.x · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Martin GR King AS, McLelland J Eye Form and Function in Birds 1985 3 London: Academic Press 311 373
- Heesy CP On the relationship between orbit orientation and binocular visual field overlap in mammals Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2004 281 1104 1110 15470671 15470671 10.1002/ar.a.20116 · DOI
- Cartmill M Rethinking primate origins Science 1974 184 436 443 4819676
- Bookstein FL Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape Med Image Anal 1997 1 225 243 9873908
- Bookstein F Schaefer K Prossinger H Seidler H Fieder M Stringer C Weber GW Arsuaga JL Slice DE Rohlf FJ Comparing frontal cranial profiles in archaic and modern Homo by morphometric analysis Anat Rec 1999 257 217 224 10620751
- Gunz P Mitteroecker P Bookstein F Slice DE Semilandmarks in three dimensions Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthroplogy 2005 New York: Kluwer Press 73 98
- Bookstein F Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology 1991 New York: Cambridge University Press
- Bookstein FL Gunz P Mitteroecker P Prossinger H Schaefer K Seidler H Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution J Hum Evol 2003 44 167 187 12662941
- Rohlf FJ Marcus LF A revolution in morphometrics Trends Ecol Evol 1993 8 129 132 21236128
- Mitteroecker P Bookstein F The conceptual and statistical relationship between modularity and morphological integration Syst Biol 2007 56 818 836 17934997
- Marugan-Lobon J Buscalioni AD Avian skull morphological evolution: exploring exo- and endocranial covariation with two-block partial least squares Zoology 2006 109 217 230 16828269
- Meij MAA van der A tough nut to crack. Adaptations to seed cracking in finches PhD thesis 2005 University of Leiden
- Brewer ML Hertel F Wing morphology and flight behavior of pelecaniform seabirds J Morphol 2007 268 866 877 17638303
- Grant PR Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches 1986 Princeton: Princeton University Press
- Rohlf FJ Corti M Use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape Syst Biol 2000 49 740 753 12116437
- Bout RG Zweers GA The role of cranial kinesis in birds Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2001 131 197 205 11733177
- Martin GR Katzir G Visual fields in short-toed eagles, Circaetus gallicus (Accipitridae), and the function of binocularity in birds Brain Behav Evol 1999 53 55 66 9933782
- Zusi RL Hanken J, Hall BK Patterns of diversity in the avian skull The Skull 1993 2 Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 391 437
- Duijm M On the head posture in birds and its relation to some anatomical features: I-II Proceedings, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, ser C, Biological and Medical Sciences 1951 54 202 271
- Norberg U Vertebrate Flight: Mechanics, Physiology, Morphology, Ecology and Evolution 1990 Berlin: Springer
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium
Felice, R. N., & Goswami, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1716437115 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
“, not subdivided into semiautonomous modules) (9, 10, 12).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe shapes of bird beaks are highly controlled by nondietary factors
Bright, J. A., Marugán-Lobón, J., Cobb, S. N., & Rayfield, E. J. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1602683113 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Morphological Disparity of the Humerus in Modern Birds
Serrano, F. J., Costa-Pérez, M., Navalón, G., & Martín-Serra, A. (2020) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d12050173 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kulemeyer, C., Asbahr, K., Gunz, P., Frahnert, S., & Bairlein, F.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Avian Research (DE)
- Museum für Naturkunde (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kulemeyer, Christoph
- Venue
- Frontiers in Zoology
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2
- ISSN
- 1742-9994 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2651141
- OpenAlex
- W2047050532
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Zoology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Keywords
- Corvidae, skull morphology, bill shape, morphological integration, feeding ecology, foramen magnum, allometry, jackdaw, Eurasian jay, black-billed magpie, hooded crow, rook, Corvus corax, 3D geometric morphometrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review