Cited by 74Speech and dialogue systemsTechnology Use by Older AdultsSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

Development of an automated speech recognition interface for personal emergency response systems

Open access
Hamill, Melinda, Young, Vicky, Boger, Jennifer, Mihailidis, Alex·2009·Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Background: Demands on long-term-care facilities are predicted to increase at an unprecedented rate as the baby boomer generation reaches retirement age. Aging-in-place (i.e. aging at home) is the desire of most seniors and is also a good option to reduce the burden on an over-stretched long-term-care system. Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERSs) help enable older adults to age-in-place by providing them with immediate access to emergency assistance. Traditionally they operate with push-button activators that connect the occupant via speaker-phone to a live emergency call-centre operator. If occupants do not wear the push button or cannot access the button, then the system is useless in the event of a fall or emergency. Additionally, a false alarm or failure to check-in at a regular interval will trigger a connection to a live operator, which can be unwanted and intrusive to the occupant. This paper describes the development and testing of an automated, hands-free, dialogue-based PERS prototype. Methods: The prototype system was built using a ceiling mounted microphone array, an open-source automatic speech recognition engine, and a 'yes' and 'no' response dialog modelled after an existing call-centre protocol. Testing compared a single microphone versus a microphone array with nine adults in both noisy and quiet conditions. Dialogue testing was completed with four adults. Results and discussion: The microphone array demonstrated improvement over the single microphone. In all cases, dialog testing resulted in the system reaching the correct decision about the kind of assistance the user was requesting. Further testing is required with elderly voices and under different noise conditions to ensure the appropriateness of the technology. Future developments include integration of the system with an emergency detection method as well as communication enhancement using features such as barge-in capability. Conclusion: The use of an automated dialog-based PERS has the potential to provide users with more autonomy in decisions regarding their own health and more privacy in their own home.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1743-0003-6-26

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In-home studies are typically run with fewer participants.

    “Furthermore, In home studies are typically run with fewer participants.”

    From Making Emergency Calls More Accessible to Older Adults Through a Hands-free Speech Interface in the House (2019) · cites this paper as Hamill et al., 2009

    The Methods section reports a prototype test with four participants, supporting the point that this study used a small sample. But the paper does not say that in-home studies typically have fewer participants; its Discussion calls for larger groups and testing in real-world settings. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Demiris G Rantz MJ Aud MA Marek KD Tyrer HW Skubic M Hussam AA Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of 'smart home' technologies: a pilot study Med Inform Internet Med 2004 29 87 94 15370989 10.1080/14639230410001684387 · DOI
  2. Johnson M Cusick A Chang S Home-screen: a short scale to measure fall risk in the home Public Health Nursing 2001 18 169 177 11359618 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2001.00169.x · DOI
  3. El-Faizy M Reinsch S Home safety intervention for the prevention of falls Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics 1994 12 33 49 10.1300/J148V12N03_03 · DOI
  4. Tinetti ME Speechley M Ginter SF Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community N Engl J Med 1988 319 1701 1707 3205267
  5. Marek K Rantz M Aging in place: a new model for long-term care Nursing Administration Quarterly 2000 24 1 11 10986927
  6. Gordon M Community care for the elderly: is it really better? CMAJ 1993 148 393 396 8439910 PMC1490478
  7. Hizer DD Hamilton A Emergency response systems: an overview Journal of Applied Gerontology 1983 2 70 77 10.1177/073346488300200109 · DOI
  8. Mann W Belchior P Tomita M Kemp B Use of personal emergency response systems by older individuals with disabilities Assistive Technology 2005 17 82 88 16121648
  9. Porter EJ Wearing and using personal emergency response system buttons: older frail widows' intentions Journal of Gerontological Nursing 2005 31 26 33 16262088
  10. Porter EJ Moments of apprehension in the midst of a certainty: some frail older widows' lives with a personal emergency response system Qualitative Health Research 2003 13 1311 1323 14606415 10.1177/1049732303253340 · DOI
  11. Williams J Poupart P Young S Partially observable Markov decision processes with continuous observations for dialogue management 6th SigDial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue; Lisbon, Portugal 2005
  12. Sixsmith A Johnson N A smart sensor to detect the falls of the elderly IEEE Pervasive Computing 2004 3 42 47 10.1109/MPRV.2004.1316817 · DOI
  13. Tam T Boger J Dolan A Mihailidis A An intelligent emergency response system: preliminary development and testing of a functional health monitoring system Gerontechnology 2006 4 209 222 10.4017/gt.2006.04.04.005.00 · DOI
  14. Lee T Mihailidis A An intelligent emergency response system: preliminary development and testing of automated fall detection J Telemed Telecare 2004 11 194 198 15969795 10.1258/1357633054068946 · DOI
  15. Rialle V Noury N Hervé T An experimental health smart home and its distributed internet-based information and communication system: first steps of a research project Stud Health Technol Inform 2001 84 1479 1483 11604972
  16. Hughes TB Kim H-S DiBiase JH Silverman HF Performance of an HMM speech recognizer using a real-time tracking microphone array as input IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 1999 7 346 349 10.1109/89.759045 · DOI
  17. Matassoni M Omologo M Giuliani D Svaizer P Hidden Markov model training with contaminated speech material for distant-talking speech recognition Computer Speech and Language 2002 16 205 223 10.1006/csla.2002.0191 · DOI
  18. Brandstein M Ward D Microphone Arrays 2001 New York: Springer
  19. Hu J Liu W Cheng C Robust beamforming of microphone array using H8 adaptive filtering technique IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences 2006 E89-A 708 715 10.1093/ietfec/e89-a.3.708 · DOI
  20. Rafaely B Phase-mode versus delay-and-sum spherical microphone array processing IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2005 12 713 716 10.1109/LSP.2005.855542 · DOI
  21. Lopez M Bergasa L Barea R Escudero M A navigation system for assistant robots using visually augmented POMDPs Autonomous Robots 2005 19 67 87 10.1007/s10514-005-0607-3 · DOI
  22. Mann W Marchant T Tomita M Fraas L Stanton K Elder acceptance of health monitoring devices in the home Care Manag J 2002 3 91 98 12455220
  23. Levin E Pieraccini R A stochastic model of human-machine interaction for learning dialog strategies IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2000 8 11 21 10.1109/89.817450 · DOI
  24. Helzner EP Cauley JA Pratt SR Wisniewski SR Zmuda JM Talbott EO Rekeneire N Harris TB Rubin SM Simonsick EM Tylavsky FA Newman AB Race and sex differences in age-related hearing loss: The health, aging and body composition study Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2005 53 2119 2127 16398896 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00525.x · DOI
  25. Huang C Chen T Chang E Accent issues in large vocabulary continuous speech recognition International Journal of Speech Technology 2004 7 141 153 10.1023/B:IJST.0000017014.52972.1d · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamill, M., Young, V., Boger, J., & Mihailidis, A.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Mihailidis, Alex
Venue
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2009-07-08
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
26-26
ISSN
1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052793700
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
personal emergency response systems, speech recognition, aging in place, older adults, microphone array, fall detection, emergency relief, long-term care, privacy, noise robustness
MeSH terms
Adult, Electronic Data Processing, Emergency Medical Service Communication Systems, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Noise, Speech, User-Computer Interface, Speech Recognition Software, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review