Cited by 81Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studiesEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

On the identification of sensory information from mixed nerves by using single-channel cuff electrodes

Open access
Raspopovic, Stanisa, Carpaneto, Jacopo, Udina, Esther, Navarro, Xavier, Micera, Silvestro·2010·Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several groups have shown that the performance of motor neuroprostheses can be significantly improved by detecting specific sensory events related to the ongoing motor task (e.g., the slippage of an object during grasping). Algorithms have been developed to achieve this goal by processing electroneurographic (ENG) afferent signals recorded by using single-channel cuff electrodes. However, no efforts have been made so far to understand the number and type of detectable sensory events that can be differentiated from whole nerve recordings using this approach. METHODS: To this aim, ENG afferent signals, evoked by different sensory stimuli were recorded using single-channel cuff electrodes placed around the sciatic nerve of anesthetized rats. The ENG signals were digitally processed and several features were extracted and used as inputs for the classification. The work was performed on integral datasets, without eliminating any noisy parts, in order to be as close as possible to real application. RESULTS: The results obtained showed that single-channel cuff electrodes are able to provide information on two to three different afferent (proprioceptive, mechanical and nociceptive) stimuli, with reasonably good discrimination ability. The classification performances are affected by the SNR of the signal, which in turn is related to the diameter of the fibers encoding a particular type of neurophysiological stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that signals of acceptable SNR and corresponding to different physiological modalities (e.g. mediated by different types of nerve fibers) may be distinguished.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1743-0003-7-17

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motor and sensory nerve signals gathered using cuff electrodes have been used to guide and fine-tune prostheses such as artificial limbs in human patients.

    “Although more challenging to carry out compared to nerve stimulation due to the distance between electrodes and the weak electrical signals transmitted by axons, with an ECM-rich epineurium separating the two, motor and sensory nerve signals gathered using cuff electrodes have been used to guide and fine-tune prostheses such as artificial limbs in human patients (Micera et al., 2001; Navarro et al”

    From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Raspopovic et al., 2010

    The Background (page unavailable) reports that recorded sensory nerve activity has been used for closed-loop control of FES systems and hand prostheses; the References include an example involving a quadriplegic patient. But the paper does not establish that cuff-recorded motor signals were used to control prostheses in human patients. Its own cuff-recording experiments used anesthetized rats, and the Discussion says distinguishing motor from sensory signals should be tested in human implants. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 81

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zhou L Donaldson NN When can the autocorrelation be used for the classification of ENG signals? In proceedings IFESS Conf Vienna 2001

Authors
Raspopovic, S., Carpaneto, J., Udina, E., Navarro, X., & Micera, S.
Affiliations
  • Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Navarro, Xavier
  • Micera, Silvestro
Venue
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2010-04-27
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
17-17
ISSN
1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144734954
Cited by
81
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
electroneurography, sciatic nerve, afferent signals, proprioception, mechanical stimulation, nociception, signal-to-noise ratio, nerve fiber diameter
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Algorithms, Animals, Electrodes, Electrophysiology, Neural Conduction, Sciatic Nerve, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review