The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoparticle inhalation augments particle-dependent systemic microvascular dysfunction
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: We have shown that pulmonary exposure to fine particulate matter (PM) impairs endothelium dependent dilation in systemic arterioles. Ultrafine PM has been suggested to be inherently more toxic by virtue of its increased surface area. The purpose of this study was to determine if ultrafine PM (or nanoparticle) inhalation produces greater microvascular dysfunction than fine PM. Rats were exposed to fine or ultrafine TiO2 aerosols (primary particle diameters of ~1 mum and ~21 nm, respectively) at concentrations which do not alter bronchoalveolar lavage markers of pulmonary inflammation or lung damage. RESULTS: By histopathologic evaluation, no significant inflammatory changes were seen in the lung. However, particle-containing macrophages were frequently seen in intimate contact with the alveolar wall. The spinotrapezius muscle was prepared for in vivo microscopy 24 hours after inhalation exposures. Intraluminal infusion of the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 was used to evaluate endothelium-dependent arteriolar dilation. In control rats, A23187 infusion produced dose-dependent arteriolar dilations. In rats exposed to fine TiO2, A23187 infusion elicited vasodilations that were blunted in proportion to pulmonary particle deposition. In rats exposed to ultrafine TiO2, A23187 infusion produced arteriolar constrictions or significantly impaired vasodilator responses as compared to the responses observed in control rats or those exposed to a similar pulmonary load of fine particles. CONCLUSION: These observations suggest that at equivalent pulmonary loads, as compared to fine TiO2, ultrafine TiO2 inhalation produces greater remote microvascular dysfunction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01269a023 · Cited by 28,156
Cited by
Indoor air pollutants in office environments: Assessment of comfort, health, and performance
Wolkoff, P. (2013) · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.08.001 · Cited by 342
Inhalation Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) and Carbon Nanofibers (CNF): Methodology and Dosimetry
Oberdörster, G., Castranova, V., Asgharian, B., & Sayre, P. (2015) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2015.1051611 · Cited by 150
Self-citationMorales-Rubio, R. A., Alvarado-Cruz, I., Manzano-León, N., Andrade-Oliva, M.-D.-L.-A., Uribe-Ramirez, M., Quintanilla-Vega, B., Osornio-Vargas, Á., & De Vizcaya-Ruiz, A. (2019) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-019-0289-1 · Cited by 62
Abukabda, A. B., McBride, C. R., Batchelor, T. P., Goldsmith, W. T., Bowdridge, E. C., Garner, K. L., Friend, S., & Nurkiewicz, T. R. (2018) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-018-0280-2 · Cited by 22
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nurkiewicz, T. R., Porter, D. W., Hubbs, A. F., Cumpston, J. L., Chen, B. T., Frazer, D. G., & Castranova, V.
- Venue
- Particle and Fibre Toxicology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1743-8977 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164785185
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoparticle inhalation augments particle-dependent systemic microvascular dysfunction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1743-8977-5-1
- The paper
- Nurkiewicz, T. R., Porter, D. W., Hubbs, A. F., Cumpston, J. L., Chen, B. T., Frazer, D. G., & Castranova, V. (2008). Nanoparticle inhalation augments particle-dependent systemic microvascular dysfunction. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-5-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.