The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review
Open accessAbstract
Risk, associated with nanomaterial use, is determined by exposure and hazard potential of these materials. Both topics cannot be evaluated absolutely independently. Realistic dose concentrations should be tested based on stringent exposure assessments for the corresponding nanomaterial taking into account also the environmental and product matrix. This review focuses on current available information from peer reviewed publications related to airborne nanomaterial exposure. Two approaches to derive realistic exposure values are differentiated and independently presented; those based on workplace measurements and the others based on simulations in laboratories. An assessment of the current available workplace measurement data using a matrix, which is related to nanomaterials and work processes, shows, that data are available on the likelihood of release and possible exposure. Laboratory studies are seen as an important complementary source of information on particle release processes and hence for possible exposure. In both cases, whether workplace measurements or laboratories studies, the issue of background particles is a major problem. From this review, major areas for future activities and focal points are identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dustiness test of nanopowders using a standard rotating drum with a modified sampling train
Tsai, C.-J., Wu, C.-H., Leu, M.-L., Chen, S.-C., Huang, C.-Y., Tsai, P.-J., & Ko, F.-H. (2009) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-008-9453-5 · Cited by 61
Cited by
Time course of lung retention and toxicity of inhaled particles: short-term exposure to nano-Ceria
Keller, J., Wohlleben, W., Ma-Hock, L., Strauss, V., Gröters, S., Küttler, K., Wiench, K., Herden, C., Oberdörster, G., van Ravenzwaay, B., et al. (2014) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-014-1349-9 · Cited by 115
Recycling concrete: An undiscovered source of ultrafine particles
Kumar, P., & Morawska, L. (2014) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.035 · Cited by 37
Hunt, G., Lynch, I., Cassee, F., Handy, R., Fernandes, T., Berges, M., Kuhlbusch, T., Dusinska, M., & Riediker, M. (2013) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma6031090 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhlbusch, T. A., Asbach, C., Fissan, H., Göhler, D., & Stintz, M.
- Venue
- Particle and Fibre Toxicology
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22
- ISSN
- 1743-8977 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155987457
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 112.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1743-8977-8-22
- The paper
- Kuhlbusch, T. A., Asbach, C., Fissan, H., Göhler, D., & Stintz, M. (2011). Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-8-22
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.