The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal
Open accessAbstract
Mounting evidence suggests that there is frequently considerable variation in the risk of the outcome of interest in clinical trial populations. These differences in risk will often cause clinically important heterogeneity in treatment effects (HTE) across the trial population, such that the balance between treatment risks and benefits may differ substantially between large identifiable patient subgroups; the "average" benefit observed in the summary result may even be non-representative of the treatment effect for a typical patient in the trial. Conventional subgroup analyses, which examine whether specific patient characteristics modify the effects of treatment, are usually unable to detect even large variations in treatment benefit (and harm) across risk groups because they do not account for the fact that patients have multiple characteristics simultaneously that affect the likelihood of treatment benefit. Based upon recent evidence on optimal statistical approaches to assessing HTE, we propose a framework that prioritizes the analysis and reporting of multivariate risk-based HTE and suggests that other subgroup analyses should be explicitly labeled either as primary subgroup analyses (well-motivated by prior evidence and intended to produce clinically actionable results) or secondary (exploratory) subgroup analyses (performed to inform future research). A standardized and transparent approach to HTE assessment and reporting could substantially improve clinical trial utility and interpretability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“RCTs provide estimates of the between-subject treatment response (the average difference between the two groups) but does not provide sufficient data on how a specific individual responds to a given treatment i.e. due to heterogeneity in treatment effects [21].”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“RCTs provide estimates of the between-subject treatment response (the average difference between the two groups) but does not provide sufficient data on how a specific individual responds to a given treatment i.e. due to heterogeneity in treatment effects [21].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
Self-citationValidation of a combined comorbidity index
Charlson, M., Szatrowski, T. P., Peterson, J., & Gold, J. (1994) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5 · Cited by 6,587
Gage, B. F., Waterman, A. D., Shannon, W., Boechler, M., Rich, M. W., & Radford, M. J. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.22.2864 · Cited by 4,832
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 1×
“Additionally, because conventional subgroup analyses involve multiple comparisons and involve splitting the overall sample to smaller sub-samples, they are both under-powered for detecting genuine subgroup effects (prone to false-negatives), and even more commonly they are prone to false positive findings [25-31].”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina/Non–ST Elevation MI
Antman, E. M., Cohen, M. C., Bernink, P. J. L. M., McCabe, C. H., Horacek, T., Papuchis, G., Mautner, B., Corbalán, R., Radley, D. R., & Braunwald, E. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.7.835 · Cited by 3,221
Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how?
Bender, R., & Lange, S. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00314-0 · Cited by 3,168
Yusuf, S., Zucker, D. M., Passamani, E. R., Peduzzi, P. N., Takaro, T., Fisher, L. D., Kennedy, J. W., Davis, K. B., Killip, T., Norris, R. M., et al. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91963-1 · Cited by 2,125
Cannon, C. P., Weintraub, W. S., Demopoulos, L. A., Vicari, R. M., Frey, M. J., Lakkis, N. M., Neumann, F., Robertson, D. H., DeLucca, P. T., DiBattiste, P. M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200106213442501 · Cited by 2,093
(2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67660-x · Cited by 1,858
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 505
Association of Dietary, Circulating, and Supplement Fatty Acids With Coronary Risk
Davidoff, F., & Rosenberg, I. H. (2014) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/l14-5018-3 · Cited by 2
Re: Selecting Optimal Subgroups for Treatment Using Many Covariates
Kent, D. M., & Klaveren, D. V. (2019) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000001156 · Cited by 2
Self-citationMushahid, H., Shah, S., Farhan, S. H., Shuja, M. H., Balasingam, K., Siddiqui, A. A., Hameed, I., Akram, K., Mushahid, S., & Usman, M. (2024) · American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40256-024-00636-6 · Cited by 1
Zheng, Y., Currier, J., & Hughes, M. D. (2025) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/17407745251338558 · Cited by 1
Fukuokaya, W., Mori, K., Yanagisawa, T., Ito, K., Urabe, F., Rajwa, P., Shariat, S. F., Kimura, T., & Hirakawa, A. (2026) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.71507 · Cited by 1
García-Zamora, S., da Silva, F. T., Labudovic, I., & Vicco, M. H. (2026) · Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.70558 · Cited by 1
Serpico, D., & Maziarz, M. (2023) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-023-00559-0 · Cited by 2
Antidepressant Medication Use for Treatment of Chronic Ocular Pain
Lott, L. B. D., Khan, N., Woodward, M. A., Clauw, D. J., & Galor, A. (2024) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000003646 · Cited by 1
Chung, T. A., Suffoletto, B. P., & Bhurosy, T. (2024) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2024.209562 · Cited by 1
MacDonald, R., Bai, D., ZHANG, Z.-H., Huang, N., Gao, J.-Y., Zhang, X., Fan, L., Shu-min, C. H. E. N., & Lu, L. U. O. (2026) · 世界针灸杂志:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.wjam.2026.02.004 · Cited by 1
de Leeuw, P. W., Mancia, G., Palmer, C., Ruilope, L. M., Schalm, S. W., & Brown, M. J. (2026) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000004284 · Cited by 1
Alalawi, A. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm15062320 · Cited by 1
Biswas, S. K., Srivastava, Y., & Hamadttu, A. (2026) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12872-026-05740-w · Cited by 1
Fatigue in Neurological Rehabilitation: Why Brain Diversity and Population Diversity Matter
Rudroff, T. (2026) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/15459683261481762 · Cited by 1
Registration of epidemiological studies: benefits and risks
Ellenberg, S. S., & Lewis, J. D. (2011) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.2111 · Cited by 1
Improving Prognostic Web Calculators: Violation of Preferential Risk Independence
Alemi, F., Levy, C. R., Citron, B. A., Williams, A. R., Pracht, E. E., & Williams, A. E. (2016) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2016.0126 · Cited by 1
Singh, S. K. S. (2016) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 1
Development of Personalized Medicine
Jain, K. K. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62080-6_22 · Cited by 1
Jia, S., Liu, X., Qu, H., & Jia, X. (2024) · International Journal of General Medicine · doi:10.2147/ijgm.s459323 · Cited by 1
Zampieri, F. G., Rathwell, S., McAlister, F. A., Ross, H. J., Escobedo, J., Saldarriaga, C., Colin-Ramírez, E., Troughton, R. W., Macdonald, P. S., Alemayehu, W. G., et al. (2025) · Journal of Cardiac Failure · doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.01.027 · Cited by 1
Xie, Y., Yan, Y., Hong, Q., Zheng, H., Cao, L., Li, X., Liu, S., & Chen, H. (2025) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-025-04038-6 · Cited by 1
Doubly Robust Estimators for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Heteroskedastic Survival Data
Yang, Y., Hu, W., Liao, Z., & Chen, F. (2025) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.70301 · Cited by 2
Segal, J. B., & on behalf of the PRIORITIZE HCV Study Group (2020) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774520941257 · Cited by 1
The assessment of heterogeneity is mandatory in clinical trials and systematic reviews
Bender, R., Koch, A., Skipka, G., Kaiser, T., & Lange, S. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.002 · Cited by 1
Spertus, J. A. (2011) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.111.961128 · Cited by 1
Finding and assessing treatment effect sweet spots in clinical trial dataPreprint
Craig, E., Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.10157 · Cited by 1
Sadatsafavi, M., Mansournia, M. A., & Gustafson, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.1002/sim.8481 · Cited by 10
Skills, Knowledge, and Prediction
Accad, M. F. (2012) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.007
Managing physician lipid management: a population wide, risk-based decision support approach
Rubenstein, L. V. (2015) · Israel Journal of Health Policy Research · doi:10.1186/s13584-015-0032-9
van Kruijsdijk, R. C. M. (2014) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
From mechanism to empiricism: the evolution of heterogeneity of treatment effects
McElwee, N. E., & Girman, C. J. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer.14.49
Bowater, R. J., Hartley, L., & Lilford, R. J. (2015)
Development of Clinical Practice
Craske, M. G., Crawford, K. A., Kivlahan, D. R., Magnavita, J. J., Ollendick, T. H., Sexton, T. L., Bufka, L. F., Galper, D. I., & Kurtzman, H. S. (2014)
Courtright, K. R. (2016) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.01.031
Tillotson, G. (2016) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.01.027
Rehabilitation while standing.
Vannini, A. M. (2000) · PubMed
Heterogeneity of therapeutic effects
Trampisch, H. J., Rudolf, H., & Lange, S. (2016) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.10.034
Very Tentative Introductory Syllabus
DiNardo, J. (2014)
Encouraging Recruitment of Under-Represented Groups in Clinical Studies: A Sponsor's Perspective
Stennett, S. (2022) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/10116725
Long, M. C. (2015) · 2015 Fall Conference: The Golden Age of Evidence-Based Policy
Hankey, G. J. (2017) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2142
Whom to Treat for High Blood Pressure—Time for a Precision Approach
Moran, A. E., Pletcher, M. J., & Bibbins-Domingo, K. B. (2018) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7853
Searching for an Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure Target: A Balance of Benefits and Risks
Leung, A. A. C., & Padwal, R. S. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2018.08.037
Sadatsafavi, M., Mansournia, M. A., & Gustafson, P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Wu, C., & Holmes, C. C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03531
Patent foramen ovale: the known unknowns
Thaler, D. E., & Gans, S. (2019) · EuroIntervention · doi:10.4244/eijv14i13a244
Concannon, T. W., Lundquist, C. M., Lutz, J. S., Kent, D. M., & Paulus, J. K. (2020) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0033
Self-citationGera, R. G., & Friede, T. (2023) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.202000326
Schmidt, A. F. (2014) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Duan, T., & Basu, S. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108872188.006
Suen, S., Scheinker, D., & Enns, E. A. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108872188.004
Leyenaar, J. K., McDaniel, C. E., Acquilano, S. C., Schaefer, A., BRUCE, M. L., & O’Malley, A. J. (2020) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-52189/v1
Aronow, W. S. (2019) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.735910698.793566214
Analytical Approaches for Post-Authorization Safety Studies
(2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809217-0.00005-2
Meng, Y., Chen, C., Jiang, Z., Chen, K., Ouyang, J., Wang, H., & Huang, J. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1681671/v1
Prognostic and treatment effect modeling in medical research
Hoogland, J. (2023) · doi:10.33540/1789 · Cited by 1
Network and covariate adjusted response‐adaptive design for binary response
Mei, H., Xie, J., Qin, Y., & Li, Y. (2023) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9915
Arumairaj, A. J., Habtes, I., Park, H., Valencia-Manrique, J. C., Arzu, J. L., Mattana, J., Chaudhari, S., Trenard, N., & Newman, T. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.54653
Pawson, R. (2024) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781035321100.00053
Lies, damned lies, and statistical populations
Raymond, J., & Darsaut, T. E. (2024) · Neurochirurgie · doi:10.1016/j.neuchi.2024.101610
Thirunavukarasu, A. J., Guru, S., Rocha, H., & Sekhon, C. S. (2025) · Eye · doi:10.1038/s41433-025-03922-y
Huang, J., & Lin, J. (2025) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000003057
Reaching Individualized Optimal Oxygen Therapy in Mechanically Ventilated Patients—Reply
Grocott, M. P. W., Mouncey, P. R., & Martín, D. (2025) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2025.14080
Zhou, S., Zhao, Y., Mao, H., & Wang, G. (2025) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155297
Schoenfeld, E. M., Poronsky, K. E., Westafer, L. M., DiFronzo, B. M., Visintainer, P., Scales, C. D., Hess, E. P., & Lindenauer, P. K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14196715
Schoenfeld, E. M., Poronsky, K. E., Westafer, L. M., DiFronzo, B. M., Visintainer, P., Scales, C. D., Hess, E. P., & Lindenauer, P. K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14196718
Schoenfeld, E. M., Poronsky, K. E., Westafer, L. M., DiFronzo, B. M., Visintainer, P., Scales, C. D., Hess, E. P., & Lindenauer, P. K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14196712
Schoenfeld, E. M., Poronsky, K. E., Westafer, L. M., DiFronzo, B. M., Visintainer, P., Scales, C. D., Hess, E. P., & Lindenauer, P. K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14196724
Schoenfeld, E. M., Poronsky, K. E., Westafer, L. M., DiFronzo, B. M., Visintainer, P., Scales, C. D., Hess, E. P., & Lindenauer, P. K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14196721
Watson, J. A., & Holmes, C. C. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12270440
Mezlini, A. M., Das, S., & Goldenberg, A. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14478611
Rekkas, A., Rijnbeek, P. R., Kent, D. M., Steyerberg, E. W., & van Klaveren, D. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22619365
Self-citationSchoenfeld, E. M., Poronsky, K. E., Westafer, L. M., DiFronzo, B. M., Visintainer, P., Scales, C. D., Hess, E. P., & Lindenauer, P. K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14196709
Rashid, D., & Zehra, S. (2026) · Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia · doi:10.4103/aca.aca_223_25
Strategies to improve regional representation in heart failure randomized controlled clinical trials
Baudry, G., Monzo, L., Newton, R. A. V., Li, G., Petrie, M. C., Girerd, N., Mebazaa, A., Garaygordobil, D. A., Mocumbi, A. O., Rohwedder, K., et al. (2026) · Nature Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1038/s44161-026-00779-6
Comparison of disease risk score methods to study treatment effect heterogeneity: a simulation study
Thelen, H. E., Yang, W., Hennessy, S., Cohen, J. B., Guo, W., & Miano, T. A. (2026) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwag050
Li, Y., & Li, B. (2026) · Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine · doi:10.17219/acem/207571
The Use of Baseline Score in Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Competing Interventions
Hamza, T., Chalkou, K., Pellegrini, F., Lorscheider, J., Kühle, J., Meier, N., Pletscher, M., Egger, M., Salanti, G., Manca, A., et al. (2026) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2026.03.2245
Lee, C. K., & Simes, R. J. (2026) · JNCI Cancer Spectrum · doi:10.1093/jncics/pkag031
Raskin, M. B., Karhu-Leperd, I., Harris, C., Pirracchio, R., Lascarrou, J.-B., & Stevens, R. D. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.05.04.26352388
Moreira, M. F., & Oliveira, M. A. P. (2026) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2026.05.005
A dynamic perspective on clinical treatment evaluation using dynamic structural equation modeling
He, S., & Lee, W. (2026) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-026-02921-1
Tellier, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1865449
Vaccine Mandates and Evidence-Based Medicine: A Narrative Review
Liester, M. B. (2026) · Journal of Independent Medicine · doi:10.71189/jim/2026/v02n04a05
A new mathematical analysis of randomized trials applied to critical care syndromes: a review
Lynn, L. (2026) · Patient Safety in Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13037-026-00499-7
Sandeep, B., Cheng, H., Liu, X., Huang, X., Yan, Y., Jiang, F., Xiong, D., Wu, Q., Gao, K., & Xiao, Z. (2026) · Current Problems in Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2026.103398
Schranz, D., Fehér, G., Jozifek, E. J., Karádi, Z. N., Bosnyák, E., & Szapáry, L. (2026) · Orvosi Hetilap · doi:10.1556/650.2026.33600
Stone, G. W., Lindenfeld, J. M., Zile, M. R., Anker, S. D., Rodés‐Cabau, J., Snyder, C., Kar, S., Pfeiffer, M. P., Bayés‐Genís, A., Bax, J. J., et al. (2026) · Circulation Heart Failure · doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.125.014100
Jeong, M.-A., & Kim, S.-D. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16167899
Ewing, M. T. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10898606/v1
Pais, M. (2026) · Radboud University Press eBooks · doi:10.54195/9789465153001
Tong, G., Li, C., Wang, H., Fang, X., Liu, R., Zeng, Y., Sun, Q., Ouyang, Y., Ryan, M. M., Davis‐Plourde, K. L., et al. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112512
Raj, S., & Goni, V. G. (2026) · Global Spine Journal · doi:10.1177/21925682261491295
Cook, C. E., McDevitt, A. W., Clewley, D. J., O'Halloran, B. J., Learman, K., Keter, D. L., Rossettini, G., & Keefe, F. (2026) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2026.103665
Metadata
- Authors
- Kent, D. M., Rothwell, P. M., Ioannidis, J. P., Altman, D. G., & Hayward, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Tufts Medical Center (US)
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kent, David M
- Venue
- Trials
- Published
- 2010-08-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-85
- ISSN
- 1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2928211
- OpenAlex
- W2128780239
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 17.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- National Institutes of Health (P60DK20572)
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P60DK020572, P60 DK 20572)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS062153)
- National Center for Research Resources (U54 RR023562)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- treatment effect heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, clinical trial reporting, treatment risks and benefits, risk stratification
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Risk Factors, Therapeutics, Reproducibility of Results, Multivariate Analysis, Risk Assessment, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review