Cited by 53Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local knowledge in community-based approaches to medicinal plant conservation: lessons from India

Open access
Shukla, Shailesh, Gardner, James·2006·Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community-based approaches to conservation of natural resources, in particular medicinal plants, have attracted attention of governments, non governmental organizations and international funding agencies. This paper highlights the community-based approaches used by an Indian NGO, the Rural Communes Medicinal Plant Conservation Centre (RCMPCC). The RCMPCC recognized and legitimized the role of local medicinal knowledge along with other knowledge systems to a wider audience, i.e. higher levels of government. METHODS: Besides a review of relevant literature, the research used a variety of qualitative techniques, such as semi-structured, in-depth interviews and participant observations in one of the project sites of RCMPCC. RESULTS: The review of local medicinal plant knowledge systems reveals that even though medicinal plants and associated knowledge systems (particularly local knowledge) are gaining wider recognition at the global level, the efforts to recognize and promote the un-codified folk systems of medicinal knowledge are still inadequate. In country like India, such neglect is evident through the lack of legal recognition and supporting policies. On the other hand, community-based approaches like local healers' workshops or village biologist programs implemented by RCMPCC are useful in combining both local (folk and codified) and formal systems of medicine. CONCLUSION: Despite the high reliance on the local medicinal knowledge systems for health needs in India, the formal policies and national support structures are inadequate for traditional systems of medicine and almost absent for folk medicine. On the other hand, NGOs like the RCMPCC have demonstrated that community-based and local approaches such as local healer's workshops and village biologist program can synergistically forge linkages between local knowledge with the formal sciences (in this case botany and ecology) and generate positive impacts at various levels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1746-4269-2-20

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Local vaidus, RCMPCC scientists and school students engaged in knowledge exchange during the village biologist workshop in Amboli (Photo- JPEG format)
Figure 1 Local vaidus, RCMPCC scientists and school students engaged in knowledge exchange during the village biologist workshop in Amboli (Photo- JPEG format)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Berkes F: Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resources Management. 1999, Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis
  2. Rural Commune's Medicinal Plant Conservation Center: Conservation of Medicinal Plants in Maharashtra State, Status and Progress Paper, Mimeo, Pune: RCMPCC. 2003
  3. World Health Organization: Traditional Medicines Strategy 2002–2005. 2002, Geneva: WHO
  4. Hamilton A: Medicinal plants and conservation: issues and approaches. 2005, Surrey, U.K.: International plants Conservation Unit, WWF-UK
  5. Shankar DS: Agenda for Revitalization of Indian Medical Heritage. 2001, New Delhi, India: Voluntary Health Association of India (VHAI)
  6. Gupta AK: Conserving Biodiversity and Rewarding Associated Knowledge and Innovation system: Honey Bee Perspective. 1999, Invited paper for the first Commonwealth Science Forum-Access, Bio prospecting, Intellectual Property Rights and Benefit Sharing and the Commonwealth, Ahmedabad: SRISTI, [ http://www.sristi.org/pub.html ]
  7. Kala CP: Revitalizing Traditional Herbal Therapy by Exploring Medicinal Plants: A Case Study of Uttaranchal State in India. Proceedings of the International Conference on Indigenous knowledge: Transforming the Academy: 27–28 May 2004. Edited by: Martezki A, Semali L. 2004, Pennsylvania, Penn State University, 15-22. (Accessed 19 January 2005), [ http://app.outreach.psu.edu/IndigenousKnowledges/default.asp?WhichPage=Proceedings ]
  8. Balasubramaniam AV: People's Knowledge in Health care. Reading Material in Local Health Traditions. Edited by: TSM, Foundation for Revitalization of Local Health Traditions. 2000, Bangalore: FRLHT, 17-26.
  9. Shankar DS, Venkatasubramanian P: The evolution of global standards for traditional medicines. IK Dossier on Science Development Network. 2004, (Accessed 27 August 2005), [ http://www.scidev.net/dossiers/index.cfm?fuseaction=policybrief&dossier=7&policy=58 ]
  10. Bodeker G: Medicinal plants: towards sustainability and security. 2002, Oxford, UK: Green College
  11. Shukla SR, Gardner JS: Lessons from the Equator Initiative: Rural Commune's Medicinal Plant Conservation Centre, Pune, India: A Technical Report. 2004, Winnipeg: Centre for Community-Based Resource Management, Natural Resources Institute University of Manitoba, (Accessed 24 June 2005), [ http://www.umanitoba.ca/institutes/natural_resources/nri_cbrm_projects_eiprojects.html ]
  12. Rural Commune's Medicinal Plant Conservation Center: Village Biologist Concept Note. 1999, Mimeo Pune: RCMPCC
  13. Jagtap S, Deokule S, Watve A: Occurrence of threatened fragrant Ceropegia in Toranmal Forest, Maharashtra. Current Science. 2004, 27 (5): 553-554.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Shukla, S., & Gardner, J.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Shukla, Shailesh
Venue
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Published
2006-04-07
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
20-20
ISSN
1746-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155957969
Cited by
53
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • WinnSpace (University of Winnipeg) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • International Development Research Centre
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
medicinal plant conservation, local knowledge, community-based conservation, traditional medicine, folk medicine, knowledge policy, India
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Data Collection, Female, Geography, Humans, India, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Medicine, Ayurvedic, Medicine, Traditional, Organizations, Plant Extracts, Plants, Medicinal, Public Policy, Residence Characteristics, Rural Population, Global Health, Herbal Medicine, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review