Impact of respiratory disease, diarrhea, otitis and arthritis on mortality and carcass traits in white veal calves.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known on the effects of common calf diseases on mortality and carcass traits in the white veal industry (special-fed veal), a highly integrated production system, currently criticized for the intensive pro- and metaphylactic use of antimicrobials. The objective of the present study was to determine the impact of bovine respiratory disease (BRD), diarrhea, arthritis and otitis on the economically important parameters of mortality, hot carcass weight (HCW), carcass quality, fat cover and meat color. For this purpose, a prospective study on 3519 white veal calves, housed in 10 commercial herds, was conducted. Case definitions were based on clinical observation by the producers and written treatment records were used. RESULTS: Calves received oral antimicrobial group treatments in the milk during 25.2% of the production time on average. With an increasing percentage of the production cycle spent on oral antimicrobials, HCW reduced, whereas the odds for insufficient fat cover or an undesirable red meat color both decreased. Of the calves, 14.8%, 5.3%, 1.5% and 1.6% were individually diagnosed and treated for BRD, diarrhea, arthritis and otitis, respectively. Overall, 5.7% of the calves died and the mortality risk was higher in the first weeks after arrival. Calves that experienced one BRD episode showed a 8.2 kg reduction in HCW, a lower fat cover and an increased mortality risk (hazard ratio (HR) = 5.5), compared to calves which were not individually diagnosed and treated for BRD. With an increasing number of BRD episodes, these losses increased dramatically. Additionally, calves, which experienced multiple BRD episodes, were more likely to have poor carcass quality and an undesirable red meat color at slaughter. Arthritis increased the mortality risk (HR = 3.9), and reduced HCW only when associated with BRD. Otitis did only increase the mortality risk (HR = 7.0). Diarrhea severely increased the mortality risk (HR = 11.0), reduced HCW by 9.2 kg on average and decreased carcass quality. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the massive use of group and individual treatments to alleviate the most prevalent health issues at the fattening period, the effects of BRD, diarrhea, otitis and arthritis on survival and performance are still considerable, especially in cases of chronic pneumonia with or without arthritis. Controlling calf health by effective preventive and therapeutic strategies and in particular the prevention of chronic BRD is key for the profitability of veal operations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Respiratory diseases, especially bovine respiratory disease, have a high incidence (up to 17%) at veal farms during the entire fattening period.
“Respiratory diseases, and especially bovine respiratory disease, have been shown to have a high (up to 17%) incidence at the veal farms during the entire fattening period (Pardon et al., 2013”
From Effects of pretransport diet, transport duration, and type of vehicle on physiological status of young veal calves. (2020) · cites this paper as Pardon et al., 2013
The Results (Morbidity and mortality; page not provided) report an average cohort-level BRD incidence of 17.2% in veal calves followed through production. But 17% was approximately the average, not an upper limit: cohort incidences ranged from 8.2% to 33.9%. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Pardon, B., Hostens, M., Duchateau, L., Dewulf, J., De Bleecker, K., & Deprez, P.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Pardon, Bart
- Venue
- BMC Veterinary Research
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79
- ISSN
- 1746-6148 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3639957
- OpenAlex
- W2034044854
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BMC Veterinary Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Vlaamse regering
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- bovine respiratory disease, veal calves, calf mortality, hot carcass weight, carcass characteristics, diarrhea, arthritis, otitis, antimicrobial use, antibiotic prophylaxis, chronic pneumonia, meat color, fat cover, calf health management, veal production, herd-level risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Arthritis, Belgium, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Diarrhea, Female, Male, Meat, Otitis, Prospective Studies, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Proportional Hazards Models, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review