Cited by 146Health Policy Implementation ScienceAppreciative Inquiry and Organizational ChangeHealth Sciences Research and Education

Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials

Open access
Leykum, Luci K, Pugh, Jacqueline A, Lanham, Holly J, Harmon, Joel, McDaniel, Reuben R·2009·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A gap continues to exist between what is known to be effective and what is actually delivered in the usual course of medical care. The goal of implementation research is to reduce this gap. However, a tension exists between the need to obtain generalizeable knowledge through implementation trials, and the inherent differences between healthcare organizations that make standard interventional approaches less likely to succeed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the integration of participatory action research and randomized controlled trial (RCT) study designs to suggest a new approach for studying interventions in healthcare settings. DISCUSSION: We summarize key elements of participatory action research, with particular attention to its collaborative, reflective approach. Elements of participatory action research and RCT study designs are discussed and contrasted, with a complex adaptive systems approach used to frame their integration. SUMMARY: The integration of participatory action research and RCT design results in a new approach that reflects not only the complex nature of healthcare organizations, but also the need to obtain generalizeable knowledge regarding the implementation process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-4-69

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of approaches to addressing the exploration and adoption decision phases include academic-public partnerships, community-based participatory research, and action research.

    “A number of approaches to addressing the exploration and adoption decision phases include academic-public partnerships, community-based participatory research, and action research”

    From Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors (2011) · cites this paper as Leykum et al. 2009

    The “Participatory action research defined” section (page not provided) identifies community-based participatory research as a related approach and describes action research as collaborative, problem-focused, and concerned with planning action. The copy does not identify academic-public partnerships as an approach or explicitly connect these approaches to exploration and adoption decision phases. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 146

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America Crossing the quality chasm: a new health care system for the 21st century 2001 Washington, DC: National Academy Press
  2. Wachter RM The end of the beginning: patient safety five years after 'To Err is Human' Health Affairs-Web Exclusive 2004 W4 534 545 15572380
  3. Lenfant C Clinical research to clinical practice--Lost in translation? N Engl J Med 2003 349 868 874 12944573 10.1056/NEJMsa035507 · DOI
  4. Asch SM Kerr EA Keesey J Adams JL Setodji CM Malik S McGlynn EA Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care? N Engl J Med 2006 354 1147 1156 16540615 10.1056/NEJMsa044464 · DOI
  5. Oxman AD No magic bullet: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice Canadian Medical Assoc J 1995 153 1423 1431 PMC1487455 7585368
  6. Oxman AD No magic bullet: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice Canadian Medical Assoc J 1995 153 1423 1431 PMC1487455 7585368
  7. Bero LA Grilli R Grimshaw JM Harvey E Oxman AD Thomson MA Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group BMJ 1998 317 465 468 9703533 PMC1113716
  8. Solberg LI Kottke TE Brekke ML Magnan S Davidson G Calomeni CA Conn SA Failure of a continuous quality improvement intervention to increase the delivery of preventive services. A randomized trial Eff Clin Pract 2000 3 105 115 11182958
  9. Cabana MD Rand CS Powe NR Wu AW Wilson MH Abboud PA Rubin HR Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement JAMA 1999 282 1458 1465 10535437 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Weingarten SR Henning JM Badamgarov E Knight K Hasselbad V Gano A Ofman JJ Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness - which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports BMJ 2002 325 925 12399340 10.1136/bmj.325.7370.925 PMC130055 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Katon W Russo J Von Korff M Lin E Simon G Bush T Ludman E Walker E Long-term effects of a collaborative care intervention in persistently depressed primary care patients J Gen Intern Med 2002 17 741 748 12390549 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11051.x PMC1495114 · DOI
  12. Stroebel CK McDaniel RR Jr Crabtree BF Miller WL Nutting PA Stange KC How complexity science can inform a reflective process for improvement in primary care practices Joint Commission J Qual & Patient Safety 2005 31 438 446 16156191
  13. Plsek PE Greenhalgh T Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care BMJ 2001 323 625 628 11557716 PMC1121189
  14. Miller WL McDaniel RR Jr Crabtree BF Stange KC Practice jazz: understanding variation in family practices using complexity science J Fam Pract 2001 50 872 878 11674890
  15. Cilliers P Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems 1998 New York, NY: Routledge
  16. Maguire S McKelvey B Mirabeau L Oztas N Complexity Science and Organization Studies The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies 2006 2 SAGE Publications 165 214
  17. Litaker D Tomolo A Liberatore V Stange K Aron D Using Complexity Theory to Build Interventions that Improve Health Care Delivery in Primary Care J Gen Intern Med 2006 21 30 34 16637958 PMC2557133
  18. Leykum LK Pugh J Lawrence V Parchman M Noel P Cornell J McDaniel RR Organizational interventions employing principles of complexity science have improved outcomes for patients with type II diabetes Imp Sci 2007 2 28 PMC2018702 17725834
  19. Whyte WF Participatory Action Research 1991 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  20. Waterman H Tillen D Dickson R de Koning K Action research: a systematic review and guidance for acceptance Health Technology Assessment 2001 5 1 174 11785749
  21. Viswanathan M Ammerman A Eng E Garlehner G Lohr KN Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No 99 2004 Rockville, MD: AHRQ Publication 04-E022-2 PMC4780908 15460504
  22. Khunti K Stone MA Bankart J Sinfield P Pancholi A Walker S Talbot D Farooqi A Davies MJ Primary prevention of type-2 diabetes and heart disease: action research in secondary schools serving an ethnically diverse UK population J Public Health 2008 30 30 31 18045806
  23. DiNapoli PP Lewis JB Understanding school-age obesity: through participatory action research Am J Maternal Child Nursing 2008 33 104 110 18327109
  24. Brown DR Hernandez A Saint-Jean G Evans S Tafari I Brewster LG Celestin MJ Gomez-Estefan C Regelado F Akal S Nierenberg B Kauschinger ED Schwartz R Page JB A participatory action research pilot study of urban health disparities using rapid assessment response and evaluation Am J Public Health 2008 98 28 38 18048802 PMC2156052
  25. Bradley HA Puoane T Prevention of hypertension and diabetes in an urban setting in South Africa: participatory action research with community health workers Ethnicity & Disease 2007 17 49 54 17274209
  26. Hills M Mullett J Carroll S Community-based participatory action research: transforming multidisciplinary practice in primary health care Pan Am J Public Health 2007 21 125 135 17565799
  27. Gershon RR Rubin MS Qureshi KA Canton AN Matzner FJ Participatory action research methodology in disaster research: results from the World Trade Center evacuation study Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 2008 2 142 149 18845929
  28. Aaron KF Stryer D Moving from rhetoric to evidence-based action in health care J Gen Int Med 2003 18 589 591 PMC1494893 12848843
  29. Macaulay AC Commanda LE Freeman WL Gibson N McCabe ML Robbins CM Twohig PL Participatory research maximizes community and lay involvement BMJ 1999 319 774 778 10488012 PMC1116604
  30. Heron J Co-Operative Inquiry: Research Into the Human Condition 1996 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  31. Bray JN Lee J Smith LL Yorks L Collaborative Inquiry in Practice: Action, Reflection, and Making Meaning 2000 Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications
  32. Deming WE Out of the crisis 1982 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  33. Chassin MR Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality? Milbank Q 1998 76 565 591 9879303 PMC2751107
  34. Hall JE Professionalizing action research--a meaningful strategy for modernizing services? J Nursing Mgmt 2006 14 195 200 16600007
  35. Greenwood DJ Levin M Introduction to Action Research 1998 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  36. Clemensen J Larsen SB Kyng M Kirkevold M Participatory design in health sciences: Using cooperative experimental methods in developing health services and computer technology Qual Health Research 2007 17 122 130 17170250
  37. Glasson JB Chang EM Bidewell JW The value of participatory action research in clinical nursing practice Int J Nursing Practice 2008 14 34 39 18190482
  38. Westhues A Ochocka J Jacobson N Simich L Maiter S Janzen R Fleras A Developing theory from complexity: reflections on a collaborative mixed method participatory action research study Qual Health Research 2008 18 701 717 18420539
  39. Corbett AM Francis K Chapman Y Feminist-informed participatory action research: a methodology of choice for examining critical nursing issues Int J Nursing Practice 2007 13 81 88 17394515
  40. Goto K Tiffany J Pelto G Pelletier D Use of Q methodology to analyze divergent perspectives on participatory action research as a strategy for HIV/AIDS prevention AIDS Education & Prevention 2008 20 301 311 18673063
  41. Esler DM Participatory action research in indigenous health Australian Family Physician 2008 37 457 459 18523701
  42. Oscos-Sanchez MA Lesser J Kelly P Cultural competence: a critical facilitator of success in community-based participatory action research Issues in Mental Health Nursing 2008 29 197 200 18293225

Authors
Leykum, L. K., Pugh, J. A., Lanham, H. J., Harmon, J., & McDaniel, R. R.
Affiliations
  • South Texas Veterans Health Care System (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University (US)
Corresponding author
Leykum, Luci K
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2009-10-23
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
69-69
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014376729
Cited by
146
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Health Services Research and Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
implementation research, participatory action research, randomized controlled trials, implementation trial, complex adaptive systems, healthcare organizations, knowledge transfer, generalizability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review