Cited by 130Clinical practice guidelines implementationPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Policy Implementation Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol

Open access

van der Weijden, Trudy, Légaré, France, Boivin, Antoine, Burgers, Jako S, van Veenendaal, Haske, Stiggelbout, Anne M, Faber, Marjan, Elwyn, Glyn·2010·Implementation Science

DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-5-10PMC PMC2824684

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are largely conceived as tools that will inform health professionals' decisions rather than foster patient involvement in decision making. The time now seems right to adapt clinical practice guidelines in such a way that both the professional's perspective as care provider and the patients' preferences and characteristics are being weighed equally in the decision-making process. We hypothesise that clinical practice guidelines can be adapted to facilitate the integration of individual patients' preferences in clinical decision making. This research protocol asks two questions: How should clinical practice guidelines be adapted to elicit patient preferences and to support shared decision making? What type of clinical decisions are perceived as most requiring consideration of individual patients' preferences rather than promoting a single best choice? METHODS: Stakeholders' opinions and ideas will be explored through an 18-month qualitative study. Data will be collected from in-depth individual interviews. A purposive sample of 20 to 25 key-informants will be selected among three groups of stakeholders: health professionals using guidelines (e.g., physicians, nurses); experts at the macro- and meso-level, including guideline and decision aids developers, policy makers, and researchers; and patient representatives. Ideas and recommendations expressed by stakeholders will be prioritized by nominal group technique in expert meetings. DISCUSSION: One-for-all guidelines do not account for differences in patients' characteristics and for their preferences for medical interventions and health outcomes, suggesting a need for flexible guidelines that facilitate patient involvement in clinical decision making. The question is how this can be achieved. This study is not about patient participation in guideline development, a closely related and important issue that does not however substitute for, or guarantee individual patient involvement in clinical decisions. The study results will provide the needed background for recommendations about potential effective and feasible strategies to ensure greater responsiveness of clinical practice guidelines to individual patient's preferences in clinical decision-making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-5-10

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement
Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R., Wu, A. W., Wilson, M. H., Abboud, P.-A. C., & Rubin, H. R. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458 · Cited by 6,677
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality of Care for Older Patients With Multiple Comorbid Diseases: Implications for Pay for Performance
Boyd, C. M., Darer, J., Boult, C., Fried, L. P., Boult, L., & Wu, A. W. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.6.716 · Cited by 2,581
Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model
Charles, C. A., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. J. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00145-8 · Cited by 2,439
Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process
Elwyn, G. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.ae · Cited by 1,824
Self-citation
Going from evidence to recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Vist, G. E., Liberati, A., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.ae · Cited by 1,810
Clinical practice guidelines : directions for a new program
Field, M. J., & Lohr, K. N. (1990) · Cited by 1,415
Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions.
Légaré, F., Ratté, S., Gravel, K., & Graham, I. D. (2008) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.018 · Cited by 1,321
Self-citation

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Weijden Van der T, van Veenendaal H, Timmermans DRM: Shared decision making in the Netherlands. Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung. 2007, 101: 241-6.
Chong C, Chen I, Naglie C, Krahn M: Do clinical practice guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?. Med Dec Making. 2007, 27: E63-4.

Sorted by citations

Guiding Principles for the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity: An Approach for Clinicians
American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity (2012) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04188.x · Cited by 681
Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice
Franks, P. J., Barker, J., Collier, M. A., Gethin, G., Haesler, E., Jawień, A., Laeuchli, S., Mosti, G. B., Probst, S., & Weller, C. D. (2016) · Journal of Wound Care · doi:10.12968/jowc.2016.25.sup6.s1 · Cited by 313
Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development
Shekelle, P., Woolf, S. H., Grimshaw, J., Schünemann, H. J., & Eccles, M. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-62 · Cited by 294
GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—Risk of bias and indirectness
Zhang, Y., Alonso‐Coello, P., Guyatt, G. H., Yepes-Núñez, J. J., Akl, E. A., Hazlewood, G. S., Hernandez, H. P., Etxeandia‐Ikobaltzeta, I., Qaseem, A., Williams, J. W., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.013 · Cited by 281
Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: A survey among general practitioners
Lugtenberg, M., Burgers, J., Besters, C. F., Han, D., & Westert, G. (2011) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-12-98 · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Physical activity motives, barriers, and preferences in people with obesity: A systematic review
Baillot, A., Chenail, S., Polita, N. B., Simoneau, M., Libourel, M., Nazon, É., Riesco, É., Bond, D. S., & Romain, A. J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253114 · Cited by 235
Patient and Public Involvement in Clinical Practice Guidelines
Légaré, F., Boivin, A., van der Weijden, T., Packenham, C., Burgers, J. S., Legare, J. F., St‐Jacques, S., & Gagnon, S. (2011) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x11424401 · Cited by 161
Self-citation
Policy and practice developments in the implementation of shared decision making: an international perspective
Härter, M. C., van der Weijden, T., & Elwyn, G. J. (2011) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.018 · Cited by 163
Self-citation
Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach
Zhang, Y., Alonso‐Coello, P., Brożek, J., Wiercioch, W., Etxeandia‐Ikobaltzeta, I., Akl, E. A., Meerpohl, J. J., Alhazzani, W. A., Carrasco‐Labra, A., Morgan, R. L., et al. (2017) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0621-0 · Cited by 152
Clinical practice guidelines and patient decision aids. An inevitable relationship
van der Weijden, T., Boivin, A., Burgers, J. S., Schünemann, H. J., & Elwyn, G. J. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.007 · Cited by 118
Self-citation
How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study
van der Weijden, T., Pieterse, A. H., Loon, M. S. K.-V., Knaapen, L., Légaré, F., Boivin, A., Burgers, J. S., Stiggelbout, A. M., Faber, M. J., & Elwyn, G. J. (2013) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001502 · Cited by 104
Self-citation
What do patient values and preferences mean? A taxonomy based on a systematic review of qualitative papers
Bastemeijer, C. M., Voogt, L. P., van Ewijk, H., & Hazelzet, J. A. (2016) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.019 · Cited by 110
What phytotherapy needs: Evidence‐based guidelines for better clinical practice
Colalto, C. (2017) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.5977 · Cited by 98
Incorporating patients' views in guideline development: a systematic review of guidance documents
Selva, A., Sanabria, A. J., Pequeño, S., Zhang, Y., Solà, I., Hernandez, H. P., Olid, C. S., Schünemann, H. J., & Alonso‐Coello, P. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.018 · Cited by 78
Diabetes-Specific Nutrition Algorithm: A Transcultural Program to Optimize Diabetes and Prediabetes Care
Mechanick, J. I., Marchetti, A. E., Apovian, C. M., Benchimol, A. K., Bisschop, P. H. L. T., Galvis, A. B., Hegazi, R. A. F., Jenkins, D. J. A., Mendoza, E., Sanz, M. L., et al. (2012) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-012-0253-z · Cited by 69
Development and use of a content search strategy for retrieving studies on patients' views and preferences
Selva, A., Solà, I., Zhang, Y., Hernandez, H. P., Haynes, R. B., García, L. M., Navarro, T., Schünemann, H. J., & Alonso‐Coello, P. (2017) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0698-5 · Cited by 62
Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American Society of Hematology guidelines
Etxeandia‐Ikobaltzeta, I., Zhang, Y., Brundisini, F. K., Flórez, I. D., Wiercioch, W., Nieuwlaat, R., Begum, H., Cuello‐García, C. A., Roldán, Y., Chen, R., et al. (2020) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000462 · Cited by 59
Comparison of a full systematic review versus rapid review approaches to assess a newborn screening test for tyrosinemia type 1
Taylor‐Phillips, S., Geppert, J., Stinton, C., Freeman, K., Johnson, S. A., Fraser, H., Sutcliffe, P. A., & Clarke, A. (2017) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1255 · Cited by 60
Treatment preference, adherence and outcomes in patients with cancer: literature review and development of a theoretical model
Shingler, S. L., Bennett, B. M., Cramer, J. A., Towse, A., Twelves, C., & Lloyd, A. J. (2014) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2014.952715 · Cited by 55
Development of a decision guide to support the elderly in decision making about location of care: an iterative, user-centered design
Garvelink, M. M., Emond, J., Menear, M., Brière, N., Freitas, A., Boland, L., Perez, M. M. B., Blair, L., Stacey, D., & Légaré, F. (2016) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0040-0 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Comprehensive mitigation framework for concurrent application of multiple clinical practice guidelines
Wilk, S., Michalowski, M., Michalowski, W., Rosu, D., Carrier, M., & Kezadri-Hamiaz, M. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.12.002 · Cited by 53
How do general practitioners and patients make decisions about cardiovascular disease risk?
Bonner, C., Jansen, J., McKinn, S., Irwig, L., Doust, J. A., Glasziou, P., & McCaffery, K. J. (2014) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000122 · Cited by 49
Attitudes and Perceptions about Clinical Guidelines: A Qualitative Study with Spanish Physicians
Solà, I., Carrasco, J. M., del Campo, P. D., Gracia, J., Orrego, C., Martínez, F., Kotzeva, A., Guillamón, I., Calderón, E. J., Gaminde, I., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086065 · Cited by 47
What Do Patients Want? Patient Preference in Wound Care
Corbett, L. Q., & Ennis, W. J. (2013) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2013.0458 · Cited by 47
Evidence-informed recommendations for rehabilitation with older adults living with HIV: a knowledge synthesis
O’Brien, K. K., Solomon, P. E., Trentham, B., MacLachlan, D., MacDermid, J. C., Tynan, A., Baxter, L. N., Casey, A., Chegwidden, W., Robinson, G., et al. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004692 · Cited by 46
An evidence‐based guideline on treating lumbar disc herniation with traditional Chinese medicine
Qin, X., Sun, K., Xu, W., Gao, J., Jiang, H., Chen, W., Zhang, L., Li, Z., Li, W., Yuan, P., et al. (2024) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.12598 · Cited by 51
Patient-, organization-, and system-level barriers and facilitators to preventive oral health care: a convergent mixed-methods study in primary dental care
With the PMC study team, Templeton, A. R., Young, L. C., Bish, A., Gnich, W., Cassie, H., Treweek, S. P., Bonetti, D. L., Stirling, D., MacPherson, L. M. D., et al. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0366-2 · Cited by 45
Developing an Atrial Fibrillation Guideline Support Tool (AFGuST) for shared decision making
Eckman, M. H., Wise, R. E., Naylor, K., Arduser, L., Lip, G. Y. H., D, B. M. K. M., Flaherty, M. L., Kleindorfer, D., Khan, F., Schauer, D. P., et al. (2015) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2015.1019608 · Cited by 41
A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines on the use of low molecular weight heparin and fondaparinux for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism: Implications for research and policy decision-making
Johnston, A., Hsieh, S., Carrier, M., Kelly, S., Bai, Z., Skidmore, B., & Wells, G. A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207410 · Cited by 40
Patient values in physiotherapy practice, a qualitative study
Bastemeijer, C. M., van Ewijk, H., Hazelzet, J. A., & Voogt, L. P. (2020) · Physiotherapy Research International · doi:10.1002/pri.1877 · Cited by 38
Engaging with communities, engaging with patients: amendment to the NAPCRG 1998 Policy Statement on Responsible Research With Communities: Table 1.
Allen, M., Salsberg, J., Knot, M., LeMaster, J. W., Felzien, M., Westfall, J. M., Herbert, C. P., Vickery, K. D., Culhane‐Pera, K. A., Ramsden, V. R., et al. (2016) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmw074 · Cited by 37
Prospects and Challenges for Clinical Decision Support in the Era of Big Data
Naqa, I. E., Kosorok, M. R., Jin, J., Mierzwa, M. L., & Haken, R. K. T. (2018) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.18.00002 · Cited by 38
Patient value: Perspectives from the advocacy community
Addario, B. J., Fadich, A., Fox, J., Krebs, L. U., Maskens, D. A., Oliver, K. R., Schwartz, E. C., Spurrier‐Bernard, G., & Turnham, T. J. (2017) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12628 · Cited by 40
Guideline of guidelines: primary monotherapies for localised or locally advanced prostate cancer
Lancee, M., Tikkinen, K. A. O., de Reijke, T. M., Kataja, V. V., Aben, K. K. H., & Vernooij, R. W. M. (2018) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.14237 · Cited by 35
Potential Benefits of the Self-Administration of Subcutaneous Methotrexate with Autoinjector Devices for Patients: A Review
Molina, J. T., Robledillo, J. C. L., & Casamira, N. (2021) · Drug Healthcare and Patient Safety · doi:10.2147/dhps.s290771 · Cited by 32
The involvement of gynaecological patients in the development of a clinical guideline for resumption of (work) activities in the N etherlands
Pittens, C. A. C. M., Noordegraaf, A. V., van Veen, S. C., Anema, J. R., Huirne, J. A. F., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2013) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12121 · Cited by 32
Shared Decision Making Does Not Influence Physicians against Clinical Practice Guidelines
Guerrier, M., Légaré, F., Turcotte, S., Labrecque, M., & Rivest, L. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062537 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
WikiBuild: A New Application to Support Patient and Health Care Professional Involvement in the Development of Patient Support Tools
Archambault, P. M. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1961 · Cited by 32
Assessment of Medical Students’ Shared Decision-Making in Standardized Patient Encounters
Hauer, K. E., Fernández, A., Teherani, A., Boscardin, C., & Saba, G. W. (2010) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1567-7 · Cited by 30
Patient-Important Outcomes in the Long-Term Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Mixed-Methods Approach Investigating Relative Preferences and a Proposed Taxonomy
Eiring, Ø., Nylenna, M., & Nytrøen, K. (2015) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-015-0128-x · Cited by 29
A Review on the Current Treatment Paradigm in High-Risk Prostate Cancer
Burgess, L., Roy, S., Morgan, S. C., & Malone, S. C. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13174257 · Cited by 31
Moving SDM forward in Canada: milestones, public involvement, and barriers that remain
Légaré, F., Stacey, D., Forest, P., & Coutu, M. (2011) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.011 · Cited by 30
Self-citation
Motives, barriers and preferences to physical activity in people with obesity: a systematic reviewPreprint
Baillot, A., Chenail, S., Polita, N. B., Simoneau, M., Libourel, M., Nazon, É., Riesco, É., Bond, D. S., & Romain, A. J. (2021) · SportRxiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31236/osf.io/rvaw3 · Cited by 32
How do Healthcare Workers ‘Do’ Guidelines? Exploring How Policy Decisions Impacted UK Healthcare Workers During the First Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Pilbeam, C., Tonkin-Crine, S., Martindale, A.-M., Atkinson, P., Mableson, H., Lant, S., Solomon, T., Sheard, S., & Gobat, N. (2022) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323211067772 · Cited by 20
Impact of Adding a Decision Aid to Patient Education in Adults with Asthma: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Gagné, M. E., Légaré, F., Moisan, J., & Boulet, L. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170055 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Three Conceptual Models of Patient and Public Involvement in Standard-setting: From Abstract Principles to Complex Practice
Knaapen, L., & Lehoux, P. (2016) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505431.2015.1125875 · Cited by 26
Effects of nursing interventions to improve inpatients' sleep in intensive and non‐intensive care units: Findings from an umbrella review
Bellon, F., Beti‐Abad, A., Pastells‐Peiró, R., Casado‐Ramírez, E., Moreno‐Casbas, T., Gea‐Sánchez, M., & Abad‐Corpa, E. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.16251 · Cited by 30
The illusion and the paradox of being autonomous, experiences from persons with spinal cord injury in their transition period from hospital to home
VELDE, D. V. D., Bracke, P., Hove, G. V., Josephsson, S., Devisch, I., & Vanderstraeten, G. (2011) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.608149 · Cited by 22
Forty-two systematic reviews generated 23 items for assessing the risk of bias in values and preferences' studies
Yepes-Núñez, J. J., Zhang, Y., Xie, F., Alonso‐Coello, P., Selva, A., Schünemann, H. J., & Guyatt, G. H. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.019 · Cited by 22
Leveraging Electronic Tablets for General Pediatric Care
McKee, S. J., Dugan, T. M., Downs, S. M., & Anand, V. (2015) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2014-09-ra-0071 · Cited by 21
The INVEST project: investigating the use of evidence synthesis in the design and analysis of clinical trials
Clayton, G. L., Smith, I. L., Higgins, J. P. T., Mihaylova, B., Thorpe, B., Cicero, R., Lokuge, K., Forman, J., Tierney, J. F., White, I. R., et al. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1955-y · Cited by 22
The Use of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine in Cancer: Data-Mining Study of 1 Million Web-Based Posts From Health Forums and Social Media Platforms
Lam, C. S., Zhou, K. R., Loong, H. H.-F., Chung, V. C., Ngan, C.-K., & Cheung, Y. T. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/45408 · Cited by 19
Supporting older patients in making healthcare decisions: The effectiveness of decision aids; A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gans, E. A., van Mun, L., de Groot, J. F., Munster, B. C. V., Rake, E. A., van Weert, J. C. M., Festen, S., & van den Bos, F. (2023) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107981 · Cited by 19
Incorporating the patient perspective: a critical review of clinical practice guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
Joyce, K. E., Lord, S. W., Matlock, D. D., McComb, J. M., & Thomson, R. (2012) · Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology · doi:10.1007/s10840-012-9762-6 · Cited by 19
Chronic patients’ satisfaction and priorities regarding medical care, information and services and quality of life: a French online patient community survey
Adé, A., Debroucker, F., Delporte, L., Monclin, C. D., Fayet, E., Legendre, P., Radoszycki, L., & Chekroun, M. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05373-5 · Cited by 18
EUROPLAN: A Project to Support the Development of National Plans on Rare Diseases in Europe
Taruscio, D., Gentile, A. E., Santis, M. D., Ferrelli, R. M., de la Paz, M. P., Hens, M. J., Huizer, J., Fregonese, L., Stefanov, R. S., Bottarelli, V., et al. (2013) · Public Health Genomics · doi:10.1159/000355932 · Cited by 17
Research on Teleconsultation service quality based on multi-granularity linguistic information: the perspective of regional doctors
Lu, W., Wang, X., Zhao, J., & Zhai, Y. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01155-5 · Cited by 16
Patient and Medical Oncologists’ Perspectives on Prescribed Lifestyle Intervention—Experiences of Women with Breast Cancer and Providers
Balneaves, L. G., Truant, T. L. O., Patten, C. L. V., Kirkham, A. A., Waters, E., & Campbell, K. L. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9092815 · Cited by 16
GRADE summary of findings tables enhanced understanding of values and preferences evidence
Zhang, Y., Li, S., Yepes-Núñez, J. J., Morgan, R. L., Hernandez, H. P., Alonso‐Coello, P., Ren, M., Mirza, R. D., Guyatt, G. H., & Schünemann, H. J. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.007 · Cited by 15
Value discrepancies between nurses and patients: A survey study
Humbeeck, L. V., Malfait, S., Holvoet, E., Vogelaers, D., Pauw, M. D., Noortgate, N. V. D., & Biesen, W. V. (2020) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733020906595 · Cited by 15
DBS-Edmonton App, a Tool to Manage Patient Expectations of DBS in Parkinson Disease
Yen, K., Miyasaki, J. M., Waldron, M., Yu, L., Sankar, T., & Ba, F. (2020) · Neurology Clinical Practice · doi:10.1212/cpj.0000000000000962 · Cited by 15
Is tailored messaging more effective? An analysis of a digital health intervention to promote HPV vaccination intent among Latinx
Reno, J. E., Sevick, C. J., Maertens, J., & Dempsey, A. F. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-022-00340-3 · Cited by 12
Psychosocial approaches for individuals with schizophrenia in correctional and forensic psychiatric settings: a rapid review
Dumont, M., Thériault, J., Briand, C., Dumais, A., & Potvin, S. (2018) · Journal of Forensic Practice · doi:10.1108/jfp-11-2017-0049 · Cited by 11
An innovative method for clinical practice guideline contextualisation for chronic musculoskeletal pain in the South African context
Ernstzen, D. V., Hillier, S., & Louw, Q. A. (2019) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0771-3 · Cited by 11
Colorectal cancer guidelines seldom include the patient perspective
Selva, A., Sanabria, A. J., de Guzmán, E. N., Ballesteros, M., Olid, C. S., Valli, C., Zhang, Y., Yepes-Núñez, J. J., Solà, I., Schünemann, H. J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.008 · Cited by 10
“Passing Out is a Serious Thing”: Patient Expectations for Syncope Evaluation and Management
Clouser, J. M., Sirrine, M., McMullen, C. A., Cowley, A., Smyth, S. S., Gupta, V. A., Williams, M. V., & Li, J. (2021) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s307186 · Cited by 10
Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Prehospital Evidence-Based Guidelines
Martin‐Gill, C., Panchal, A. R., Cash, R. E., Richards, C. T., Brown, K., Patterson, P. D., & for the Prehospital Guidelines Consortium (2022) · Prehospital Emergency Care · doi:10.1080/10903127.2022.2142992 · Cited by 11
Has the quality of physiotherapy care in patients with Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) improved over time? A retrospective study using routinely collected data and quality indicators
Oostendorp, R. A. B., Elvers, H., van Trijffel, E., Rutten, G. M., Scholten-Peeters, G. G. M., Heijmans, M., Hendriks, E., Mikołajewska, E., Kooning, M. D., Laekeman, M., et al. (2018) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s179808 · Cited by 10
Information technology and hospice palliative care: social, cultural, ethical and technical implications in a rural setting
Kuziemsky, C. E., Jewers, H., Appleby, B., Foshay, N., MacCaull, W., Miller, K., & Macdonald, M. (2011) · Informatics for Health and Social Care · doi:10.3109/17538157.2011.613553 · Cited by 10
Evidence-Based Practice
Florczak, K. L. (2016) · Nursing Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0894318416630096 · Cited by 10
Eliciting patient views on the allocation of limited healthcare resources: a deliberation on hepatitis C treatment in the Veterans Health Administration
Waljee, A. K., Ryan, K. A., Krenz, C. D., Ioannou, G. N., Beste, L. A., Tincopa, M. A., Saini, S. D., Su, G. L., Arasim, M. E., Roman, P. T., et al. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05211-8 · Cited by 9
Community Involvement in Development of Evidence-Informed Recommendations for Rehabilitation for Older Adults Living With HIV
Solomon, P. E., O’Brien, K. K., Baxter, L. N., MacLachlan, D., & Robinson, G. (2016) · Progress in community health partnerships · doi:10.1353/cpr.2016.0008 · Cited by 9
GRADE-Leitlinien: 19. Bewertung der Vertrauenswürdigkeit der Evidenz für die Bedeutung von Endpunkten oder Werten und Präferenzen – Risiko für Bias und Indirektheit
Kaiser, L., Hübscher, M., Rissling, O., Schulz, S., Langer, G., Meerpohl, J. J., & Schwingshackl, L. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2020.11.004 · Cited by 8
The Contribution of Treatment Allocation Method to Outcomes in Intervention Research
Sidani, S., Epstein, D. R., Bootzin, R. R., Miranda, J., & Cousins, J. C. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/084456211504700205 · Cited by 8
Nonshaved Ear Surgery: Effect of Hair on Surgical Site Infection of the Middle Ear/Mastoid Surgery and Patients’ Preference for the Hair Removal
Lee, D., Yoo, S., Shin, E., & Cho, Y. (2018) · Journal of Audiology & Otology · doi:10.7874/jao.2018.00101 · Cited by 8
Keuzehulpen voor de patiënt
van der Weijden, T., & Lennep, A. S.-V. (2012) · Huisarts en Wetenschap · doi:10.1007/s12445-012-0256-7 · Cited by 7
Evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with disability in developing clinical guidelines: study protocol of a randomized pragmatic pilot trial
Lamontagne, M., Perreault, K., & Gagnon, M. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-118 · Cited by 7
Patient centredness in integrated care: results of a qualitative study based on a systems theoretical framework
Lüdecke, D. (2014) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.1361 · Cited by 7
Expanding a First-Order Logic Mitigation Framework to Handle Multimorbid Patient Preferences.
Michalowski, M., Szymon Wilk, A., Roşu, D., Hamiaz, M. K., Michalowski, W. J., & Carrier, M. (2015) · PubMed Central · Cited by 7
Social value and individual choice: The value of a choice‐based decision‐making process in a collectively funded health system
Espinoza, M., Manca, A., Claxton, K., & Sculpher, M. (2017) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3559 · Cited by 7
Medico-Economic Standards in Russia: Balancing Legal Requirements and Patients Needs
Kamenshchikova, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64149-2_5 · Cited by 7
Evaluating the Acceptability, Feasibility, and Outcomes of Two Methods Involving Patients With Disability in Developing Clinical Guidelines: Crossover Pilot Study
Lamontagne, M., Gagnon, M., Perreault, K., & Gauthier, V. (2021) · Journal of Participatory Medicine · doi:10.2196/24319 · Cited by 6
STANDING Collaboration: a study protocol for developing clinical standards
Wiles, L., Hibbert, P. D., Stephens, J. H., Coiera, E. W., Westbrook, J. I., Braithwaite, J., Day, R. O., Hillman, K., & Runciman, W. B. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014048 · Cited by 6
Chinese Medicine for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Pilot Study on Patient Preferences
Liu, S., Lai, J., Wu, L., & Guo, X. (2021) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s316872 · Cited by 6
Desarrollo de Herramientas de Ayuda para la Toma de Decisiones Compartida derivadas de las recomendaciones de las Guías de Práctica Clínica
(2017) · GuíaSalud eBooks · doi:10.46995/man_5 · Cited by 6
Development and field testing of a tool to elicit women's preferences among cervical cancer screening modalities
Wood, B., Taljaard, M., El‐Khatib, Z., McFaul, S. M., Graham, I. D., & Little, J. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13258 · Cited by 6
The impact of treatment preferences: A narrative review
Sidani, S. (2023) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13855 · Cited by 5
Exploring Ciprofol Alternatives: A Comprehensive Review of Intravenous Anesthesia Options
Samy, N. K. D., & Taksande, K. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.57581 · Cited by 5
The effectiveness of national guidelines for preventing cardiovascular disease: integrating effectiveness concepts and evaluating guidelines' use in the real world
Manuel, D. G. (2010) · Current Opinion in Lipidology · doi:10.1097/mol.0b013e32833c1f2b · Cited by 5
In search of standards that avoid standardization: the production and regulation of evidence based guidelines
Knaapen, A.-L. (2013) · doi:10.82308/47768 · Cited by 5
Un modo de ayudar al «Sr. Minotauro» y a la «Sra. Ariadna» a salir del laberinto de la multimorbilidad: los «problemas maestros»
Turabián, J. L., & Franco, B. P. (2015) · Medicina de Familia SEMERGEN · doi:10.1016/j.semerg.2015.02.004 · Cited by 4
Incorporation of patient and family values and preferences for health‐related outcomes in paediatric obesity management: A systematic review
Zenlea, I. S., Sebastianski, M., Kucera, M., Mushquash, A. R., Boles, K., Brogly, J., Delacruz, B., McGeown, L., Ball, G. D. C., & Johnston, B. C. (2023) · Pediatric Obesity · doi:10.1111/ijpo.13006 · Cited by 4
Deep brain stimulation-related experiences for obsessive-compulsive disorder: In-depth interviews with operated patients and relatives
Baldi, S., Vandenberk, E., Bors, J., Goossens, L., Cort, K. D., Ackermans, L. P. C. M., Leentjens, A. F. G., Linden, D. E. J., Duits, A., Temel, Y., et al. (2023) · Deep Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.jdbs.2023.12.003 · Cited by 4
Exploring Similarities and Differences in a set of Linked Multiple-site Design Sessions with Children
Read, J. C., Sim, G., Fails, J. A., Bodén, M., Korte, J., Bhatnagar, S., Borchardt, L. H., Constantin, A., Gavrilescu, D., Wilson, C., et al. (2024) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3613905.3637143 · Cited by 4
The knowledge, attitudes, perceptions and perceived barriers of chiropractors within the eThekwini Municipality towards evidence-based practice
Naidoo, D. (2018) · doi:10.51415/10321/3076 · Cited by 4
Richtlijnen in de spreekkamer, van dogma naar dans
van der Weijden, T. (2010) · doi:10.26481/spe.20101126tw · Cited by 3
Psychometrics of the Computer-Based Relationships With Health Care Provider Scale in Older Adults
Anderson, E. H., Neafsey, P. J., & Peabody, S. (2011) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/1061-3749.19.1.3 · Cited by 3
Development of a values-based decision aid to determine discharge destination: Case reports of older stroke survivors and their families
Aoki, Y., & Nakayama, K. (2022) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000030934 · Cited by 3
Benefits of Home‐Based Respiratory Muscle Training from the Perspectives of Individuals Who Had a Stroke: Qualitative Study
de Menezes, K. K. P., Nascimento, L. R., Avelino, P. R., & Teixeira‐Salmela, L. F. (2020) · PM&R · doi:10.1002/pmrj.12324 · Cited by 2
Biomedical Literature Retrieval Based on Patient Information
Jimenez-Castellanos, A., Fernández, I., Pérez-Rey, D., Viejo, E., Díez, F. J., de Kortázar, X. G., García-Remesal, M., Maojo, V., Cobo, A., & del Pozo, F. (2013) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29752-6_23 · Cited by 2

Authors: van der Weijden, T., Légaré, F., Boivin, A., Burgers, J. S., van Veenendaal, H., Stiggelbout, A. M., Faber, M., & Elwyn, G.
Affiliations: Université Laval (CA)
Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement (NL)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Cardiff University (GB)
ORCID: Légaré, France
Boivin, Antoine
Burgers, Jako S
Stiggelbout, Anne M
Faber, Marjan
Elwyn, Glyn
Venue: Implementation Science
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2010-02-02
Volume: 5
Issue: 1
Pages: 10-10
ISSN: 1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-10
PMC: PMC2824684
OpenAlex: W2141819865
Cited by: 130
References: 71
Citations by year: 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI: 8.91
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations: Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders: ZonMw
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007543/1)
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords: patient preferences, shared decision-making, guideline adaptation, patient representatives, stakeholder perspectives, decision aids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks