The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tailored implementation for chronic diseases (TICD): A project protocol
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The assumption underlying tailoring is that implementation interventions are most helpful if these effectively address the most important determinants of practice for improvement in the targeted setting. The aim of the Tailored Implementation For Chronic Diseases (TICD) project is to develop valid and efficient methods of tailoring implementation interventions to determinants of practice for knowledge implementation in chronic illness care. METHODS: The TICD project has organized the planned empirical research in three work packages that follow the three main steps of tailoring: identification of determinants of healthcare practice, matching implementation interventions to identified determinants of practice, and applying and assessing the tailored implementation interventions. These three key steps of tailored implementation will be applied to targeted chronic conditions in five different healthcare systems: cardiovascular disease in the Netherlands, obesity in England, depression in Norway, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Poland, and multimorbidity in Germany. The design and interpretation of empirical research will be informed by systematic reviews of previous research on tailoring implementation interventions. DISCUSSION: The TICD project will provide much needed evidence on the advantages and disadvantages of different methods of identifying important determinants of practice and selecting implementation strategies that take account of those. It will also provide five rigorous evaluations of tailored implementation interventions for five different chronic conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A multi-national program of research was undertaken to improve the methods of tailoring implementation strategies (43), but tailored strategies had little impact on primary and secondary outcomes (40).”
From Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baker, R., Camosso-Stefinovic, J., Gillies, C., Shaw, E. J., Cheater, F., Flottorp, S., & Robertson, N. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005470.pub2 · Cited by 1,003
Self-citationPlanning and Studying Improvement in Patient Care: The Use of Theoretical Perspectives
GROL, R. P. T. M., BOSCH, M. C., HULSCHER, M. E. J. L., ECCLES, M. P., & WENSING, M. (2007) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x · Cited by 943
Self-citationEccles, M., Grimshaw, J., Walker, A., Johnston, M., & Pitts, N. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.09.002 · Cited by 917 · cited 1×
“have argued for wider use of theory in implementation research, both for intervention development and for evaluations of intervention effectiveness [5].”
Self-citationTetroe, J., Graham, I. D., Foy, R., ROBINSON, N., Eccles, M., Wensing, M., Durieux, P., Légaré, F., NIELSON, C. P., Adily, A., et al. (2008) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00515.x · Cited by 330
Self-citationTailoring quality improvement interventions to identified barriers: a multiple case analysis
Bosch, M., Van Der Weijden, T., Wensing, M., & Grol, R. (2007) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00660.x · Cited by 272
Self-citationDeveloping and selecting interventions for translating knowledge to action
Wensing, M., Bosch, M., & Grol, R. P. T. M. (2009) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.081233 · Cited by 203
Self-citationThe OFF theory of research utilization
Oxman, A. D., Fretheim, A., & Flottorp, S. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.002 · Cited by 107
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., & McMillen, J. C. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-139 · Cited by 2,585
Flottorp, S. A., Oxman, A. D., Krause, J., Musila, N. R., Wensing, M., Godycki-Cwirko, M., Baker, R., & Eccles, M. P. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-35 · Cited by 1,138
Self-citationWaltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Fernández, M. E., Abadie, B., & Damschroder, L. J. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4 · Cited by 1,136
Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies
Powell, B. J., Beidas, R. S., Lewis, C. C., Aarons, G. A., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., & Mandell, D. S. (2017) · The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/s11414-015-9475-6 · Cited by 967
Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda
Powell, B. J., Fernandez, M. E., Williams, N. J., Aarons, G. A., Beidas, R. S., Lewis, C. C., McHugh, S. M., & Weiner, B. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00003 · Cited by 775
Metadata
- Authors
- Wensing, M., Oxman, A., Baker, R., Godycki-Cwirko, M., Flottorp, S., Szecsenyi, J., Grimshaw, J., & Eccles, M.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten (NO)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wensing, Michel
- Venue
- Implementation Science
- Published
- 2011-09-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-103
- ISSN
- 1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3179734
- OpenAlex
- W2113119402
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 21.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Commission (258837, 2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- chronic care, implementation strategies, cardiovascular disease, obesity, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multimorbidity, implementation evaluation, knowledge translation
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Clinical Protocols, England, Germany, Humans, Netherlands, Norway, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Empirical Research, Evidence-Based Practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
