The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Realist synthesis is an increasingly popular approach to the review and synthesis of evidence, which focuses on understanding the mechanisms by which an intervention works (or not). There are few published examples of realist synthesis. This paper therefore fills a gap by describing, in detail, the process used for a realist review and synthesis to answer the question 'what interventions and strategies are effective in enabling evidence-informed healthcare?' The strengths and challenges of conducting realist review are also considered. METHODS: The realist approach involves identifying underlying causal mechanisms and exploring how they work under what conditions. The stages of this review included: defining the scope of the review (concept mining and framework formulation); searching for and scrutinising the evidence; extracting and synthesising the evidence; and developing the narrative, including hypotheses. RESULTS: Based on key terms and concepts related to various interventions to promote evidence-informed healthcare, we developed an outcome-focused theoretical framework. Questions were tailored for each of four theory/intervention areas within the theoretical framework and were used to guide development of a review and data extraction process. The search for literature within our first theory area, change agency, was executed and the screening procedure resulted in inclusion of 52 papers. Using the questions relevant to this theory area, data were extracted by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. Synthesis involved organisation of extracted data into evidence tables, theming and formulation of chains of inference, linking between the chains of inference, and hypothesis formulation. The narrative was developed around the hypotheses generated within the change agency theory area. CONCLUSIONS: Realist synthesis lends itself to the review of complex interventions because it accounts for context as well as outcomes in the process of systematically and transparently synthesising relevant literature. While realist synthesis demands flexible thinking and the ability to deal with complexity, the rewards include the potential for more pragmatic conclusions than alternative approaches to systematic reviewing. A separate publication will report the findings of the review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Here, it is important to understand that scoping reviews are not the same as ‘realist reviews’ which can also be used to examine how interventions or programmes work.”
From Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Realist reviews are typically designed to ellucide the theories that underpin a programme, examine evidence to reveal if and how those theories are relevant and explain how the given programme works (or not) [33].”
From Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Brien, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3 · Cited by 5,485
Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/1355819054308530 · Cited by 3,190
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044
Bero, L. A., Grilli, R., Grimshaw, J. M., Harvey, E., Oxman, A. D., & Thomson, M. A. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7156.465 · Cited by 2,396
Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review
Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-59 · Cited by 2,386
Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/135581960501000110 · Cited by 2,132
Pawson, R. (2006) · doi:10.4135/9781849209120 · Cited by 1,791
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 1,709
What counts as evidence in evidence‐based practice?
Rycroft‐Malone, J., Seers, K., Titchen, A., Harvey, G., Kitson, A. A., & McCormack, B. G. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03068.x · Cited by 960
Self-citationEffectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J. M., Thomas, R. E., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C. R., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M. P., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2005) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462305290190 · Cited by 864
Lean thinking in healthcare: a realist review of the literature
Mazzocato, P., Savage, C., Brommels, M., Aronsson, H., & Thor, J. (2010) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.037986 · Cited by 630
Realist synthesis - an introduction
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2004) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 570
The research process in nursing
Gerrish, K., & Lacey, A. (2010) · Cited by 521
Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., & Pawson, R. (2010) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-10-12 · Cited by 457
The Research Process in Nursing
Timmins, F. (2011) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2010.12.004 · Cited by 355
O’Brien, M. A., Freemantle, N., Oxman, A. D., Wolfe, F., Davis, D., & Herrin, J. S. (2001) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003030 · Cited by 340
Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES)
Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., Westhorp, G., & Pawson, R. (2011) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-115 · Cited by 279
O'Campo, P. J., Kirst, M. J., Tsamis, C., Chambers, C., & Ahmad, F. (2011) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.019 · Cited by 270
Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes
Greenhalgh, T., Kristjansson, E., & Robinson, V. (2007) · British medical journal · doi:10.1136/bmj.39359.525174.ad · Cited by 242
Social Science: Beyond Constructivism and Realism
Delanty, G. (1997) · Cited by 229
Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review
Thompson, D. S., Estabrooks, C. A., Scott-Findlay, S., Moore, K., & Wallin, L. (2007) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-15 · Cited by 205
Self-citationCritical realism: a way forward for evaluation research in nursing?
McEvoy, P., & Richards, D. A. (2003) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02730.x · Cited by 203
Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory
Pawson, R. (2003) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389003094007 · Cited by 194
Guidelines in professions allied to medicine
Thomas, L. H., Cullum, N. A., McColl, E., Rousseau, N. S., Soutter, J. L., & Steen, N. (1999) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000349 · Cited by 183
O’Brien, M. A., Freemantle, N., Oxman, A., Wolf, F. M., Davis, D., & Herrin, J. S. (2001) · BMC News and views · doi:10.1186/2048-4623-1-s3-pc118 · Cited by 153
Known Knowns, Known Unknowns, Unknown Unknowns
Pawson, R., Wong, G., & Owen, L. (2011) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214011403831 · Cited by 139
Critical Realism as emancipatory action: the case for realistic evaluation in practice development
Wilson, V., & McCormack, B. (2006) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1466-769x.2006.00248.x · Cited by 119
Self-citationNothing as Practical as a Good Theory
Andersen, K. H. (2019) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691192956.003.0001 · Cited by 106
District nurses’ role in palliative care provision: A realist review
Walshe, C., & Luker, K. A. (2010) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.04.006 · Cited by 94
Furedy, J. J. (1990) · Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/h0078903 · Cited by 41
Implementation of antiretroviral therapy adherence interventions: a realist synthesis of evidence
Leeman, J., Chang, Y., Lee, E. J., Voils, C. I., Crandell, J., & Sandelowski, M. (2010) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05360.x · Cited by 34
A realist synthesis of evidence relating to practice development: methodology and methods
McCormack, B. G., Wright, J., Dewar, B. J., Harvey, G., & Ballantine, K. (2007) · Practice Development in Health Care · doi:10.1002/pdh.210 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pawson R, Tilley N: Realistic Evaluation. 1997, London, England: Sage
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-21 · Cited by 1,374
A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management
Durach, C. F., Kembro, J. H., & Wieland, A. (2017) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12145 · Cited by 1,061
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Colquhoun, H., Garritty, C. M., Hempel, S., Horsley, T., Langlois, E. V., Lillie, E., O’Brien, K. K., Tunçalp, Ӧ., et al. (2021) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3 · Cited by 887
Charani, E., Castro‐Sánchez, E., Sevdalis, N., Kyratsis, Y., Drumright, L. N., Shah, N., & Holmes, A. H. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit212 · Cited by 466
RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12095 · Cited by 385
Metadata
- Authors
- Rycroft-Malone, J., McCormack, B., Hutchinson, A. M., DeCorby, K., Bucknall, T. K., Kent, B., Schultz, A., Snelgrove-Clarke, E., Stetler, C. B., Titler, M., Wallin, L., & Wilson, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Ulster (GB)
- Deakin University (AU)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Boston University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Venue
- Implementation Science
- Published
- 2012-04-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-33
- ISSN
- 1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3514310
- OpenAlex
- W2097730860
- Cited by
- 742
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 34.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (acceptedVersion)
- PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- realist synthesis, realist review, causal mechanisms, change agency, implementation research, complex interventions, theoretical framework, data extraction, hypothesis generation
- MeSH terms
- Health Services Research, Humans, Review Literature as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review