Cited by 237Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesHealth Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance Assessment

The use of segmented regression in analysing interrupted time series studies: an example in pre-hospital ambulance care

Open access
Taljaard, Monica, McKenzie, Joanne E, Ramsay, Craig R, Grimshaw, Jeremy M·2014·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An interrupted time series design is a powerful quasi-experimental approach for evaluating effects of interventions introduced at a specific point in time. To utilize the strength of this design, a modification to standard regression analysis, such as segmented regression, is required. In segmented regression analysis, the change in intercept and/or slope from pre- to post-intervention is estimated and used to test causal hypotheses about the intervention. We illustrate segmented regression using data from a previously published study that evaluated the effectiveness of a collaborative intervention to improve quality in pre-hospital ambulance care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke. In the original analysis, a standard regression model was used with time as a continuous variable. We contrast the results from this standard regression analysis with those from segmented regression analysis. We discuss the limitations of the former and advantages of the latter, as well as the challenges of using segmented regression in analysing complex quality improvement interventions. FINDINGS: Based on the estimated change in intercept and slope from pre- to post-intervention using segmented regression, we found insufficient evidence of a statistically significant effect on quality of care for stroke, although potential clinically important effects for AMI cannot be ruled out. CONCLUSIONS: Segmented regression analysis is the recommended approach for analysing data from an interrupted time series study. Several modifications to the basic segmented regression analysis approach are available to deal with challenges arising in the evaluation of complex quality improvement interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-9-77

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interrupted time series controls for underlying temporal trends while estimating both immediate level changes and sustained slope modifications.

    “This approach controls for underlying temporal trends while estimating both immediate level changes and sustained slope modifications [22, 27].”
  • Evidence from Uganda, Kenya, and South Africa demonstrates that nurse-led management of uncomplicated conditions maintains quality while reducing physician workload.

    “Evidence from Uganda, Kenya, and South Africa demonstrates that nurse-led management of uncomplicated conditions maintains quality while reducing physician workload [22–24].”

    From Telemedicine implementation and healthcare utilization in Rwanda: interrupted time series of Babyl digital health services from 2015 to 2024 (2026) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Illustration describes an ambulance-care intervention for heart attack and stroke in England, not nurse-led care in Uganda, Kenya, or South Africa. Searches for nurse-led management and physician workload found no passage addressing the claimed effects on quality or workload; no page numbers were provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Gebski V Ellingson K Edwards J Jernigan J Kleinbaum D Modelling interrupted time series to evaluate prevention and control of infection in healthcare Epidemiol Infect 2012 140 12 2131 2141 10.1017/S0950268812000179 22335933 PMC9152341 · DOI
  2. Penfold RB Zhang F Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements Academic Pediatrics 2013 13 S38 S44 10.1016/j.acap.2013.08.002 24268083 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ramsay CR Matowe L Grilli R Grimshaw JM Thomas RE Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: lessons from two systematic reviews of behavior change strategies Int J Tech Assess Health Care 2003 19 4 613 623 15095767
  4. Ansari F Gray K Nathwani D Phillips G Ogston S Ramsay C Davey P Outcomes of an intervention to improve hospital antibiotic prescribing: interrupted time series with segmented regression analysis J. Antimicrob. Chemother 2003 52 5 842 848 10.1093/jac/dkg459 14563900 · DOI
  5. Foy R Ramsay CR Grimshaw JM Penney GC Vale L Thomson A Greer IA The impact of guidelines on mild hypertension in pregnancy: time series analysis BJOG 2004 111 8 765 770 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00212.x 15270921 · DOI
  6. Siriwardena AN Shaw D Essam N Togher FJ Davy Z Spaight A Dewey M ASCQI Core Group The effect of a national quality improvement collaborative on prehospital care for acute myocardial infarction and stroke in England Implement Sci 2014 9 1 17 10.1186/1748-5908-9-17 24456654 PMC3904412 · DOI
  7. Serumaga B Ross-Degnan D Avery AJ Elliott RA Majumdar SR Zhang F Soumerai SB Effect of pay for performance on the management and outcomes of hypertension in the United Kingdom: interrupted time series study BMJ 2011 342 d108 10.1136/bmj.d108 21266440 PMC3026849 · DOI
  8. Normand SL Tutorial in biostatistics: Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting Stat Med 1999 18 3 321 359 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990215)18:3<321::AID-SIM28>3.0.CO;2-P 10070677 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taljaard, M., McKenzie, J. E., Ramsay, C. R., & Grimshaw, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Taljaard, Monica
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2014-06-19
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
77-77
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134942647
Cited by
237
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
11.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
segmented regression, interrupted time series, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, quality improvement intervention, collaborative intervention, intervention effect evaluation, quality of care
MeSH terms
Ambulances, Cooperative Behavior, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Emergency Medical Services, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Quality of Health Care, Regression Analysis, Research Design, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review