Cited by 60Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Intestinal ischemia after cardiac surgery: analysis of a large registry

Open access
Nilsson, Johan, Hansson, Erika, Andersson, Bodil·2013·Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Abstract

Background: Intestinal ischemia after cardiac surgery is a rare but severe complication with a high mortality. Early surgery can be lifesaving. The aim was to analyze the incidence, outcome, and risk factors for these patients. Methods: A prospectively collected database with patients who underwent 18,879 cardiac surgical procedures between 1996 and 2011 was investigated. All patients with registered gastrointestinal complications were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare patients with and without intestinal ischemia. Results: Seventeen patients suffered from intestinal ischemia (0.09%), 10 of whom (59%) died. By investigating preoperative parameters independent risk factors were steroids, peripheral vascular disease, cardiogenic shock, and New York Heart Association class 4. When including pre-, per-, and postoperative parameters, only postoperative ones were significant, including elevated creatinine (> 200 μmol/L), prolonged ventilator time, need for intra-aortic balloon pump, and cerebrovascular insult (CVI). The gastrointestinal complications score (GICS) showed a ROC area of 0.87. This was superior compared with EuroSCORE (0.74), to predict intestinal ischemia. Conclusions: Intestinal ischemia after cardiac surgery is more common in patients with a poor cardiac state, but the use of steroids, peripheral vascular disease, postoperative kidney failure, and CVI were also predictive. GICS score, developed for all GI complications after cardiac surgery, is also of value in predicting this particular complication. The risk factors presented can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of these patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1749-8090-8-156

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serum creatinine with a cut-off of 200 micromol/L had sensitivity 58% and specificity 97% in a single study.

    “Serum creatinine with a cut-off of 200 micromol/L (58 and 97%) [90].”

    From Diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers to detect acute mesenteric ischaemia in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Methods define postoperative renal failure as serum creatinine above 200 μmol/L, and Results Table 5 identifies that threshold as a risk factor for intestinal ischemia after cardiac surgery. The paper reports an odds ratio, not the claimed 58% sensitivity and 97% specificity; searches for those performance figures found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 60

Authors
Nilsson, J., Hansson, E., & Andersson, B.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Andersson, Bodil
Venue
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Published
2013-06-18
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
156-156
ISSN
1749-8090 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171174302
Cited by
60
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Hjärt-Lungfonden
  • Svenska Läkaresällskapet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Keywords
intestinal ischemia, postoperative complications, cardiac surgery, gastrointestinal complications, risk factors, mortality, corticosteroids, peripheral vascular disease, cardiogenic shock, intra-aortic balloon pump, prolonged mechanical ventilation, EuroSCORE
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Intestines, Ischemia, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, ROC Curve, Sweden, Incidence, Logistic Models, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review