Cited by 56Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Expression of SORL1 and a novel SORL1 splice variant in normal and Alzheimers disease brain

Open access
Grear, Karrie E, Ling, I-Fang, Simpson, James F, Furman, Jennifer L, Simmons, Christopher R, Peterson, Shawn L, Schmitt, Frederick A, Markesbery, William R +5 more·2009·Molecular Neurodegeneration

Abstract

Background: Variations in sortilin-related receptor (SORL1) expression and function have been implicated in Alzheimers Disease (AD). Here, to gain insights into SORL1, we evaluated SORL1 expression and splicing as a function of AD and AD neuropathology, neural gene expression and a candidate single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Results: To identify SORL1 splice variants, we scanned each of the 46 internal SORL1 exons in human brain RNA samples and readily found SORL1 isoforms that lack exon 2 or exon 19. Quantification in a case-control series of the more abundant isoform lacking exon 2 (delta-2-SORL1), as well as the "full-length" SORL1 (FL-SORL1) isoform containing exon 2 showed that expression of FL-SORL1 was reduced in AD individuals. Moreover, FL-SORL1 was reduced in cognitively intact individuals with significant AD-like neuropathology. In contrast, the expression of the delta-2-SORL1 isoform was similar in AD and non-AD brains. The expression of FL-SORL1 was significantly associated with synaptophysin expression while delta-2-SORL1 was modestly enriched in white matter. Lastly, FL-SORL1 expression was associated with rs661057, a SORL1 intron one SNP that has been associated with AD risk. A linear regression analysis found that rs661057, synaptophysin expression and AD neuropathology were each associated with FL-SORL1 expression. Conclusion: These results confirm that FL-SORL1 expression declines in AD and with AD-associated neuropathology, suggest that FL-SORL1 declines in cognitively-intact individuals with AD-associated neuropathology, identify a novel SORL1 splice variant that is expressed similarly in AD and non-AD individuals, and provide evidence that an AD-associated SNP is associated with SORL1 expression. Overall, these results contribute to our understanding of SORL1 expression in the human brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1750-1326-4-46

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SORL1 is a sorting receptor located in neurons, astrocytes, and microglia and is known to direct APP toward non-amyloidogenic processing in the trans-Golgi network.

    “SORL1, a sorting receptor located in neurons [152], astrocytes, and microglia [153] is known to direct APP toward non-amyloidogenic processing in the trans-Golgi network [148, 154].”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [152]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 56

Authors
Grear, K. E., Ling, I.-F., Simpson, J. F., Furman, J. L., Simmons, C. R., Peterson, S. L., Schmitt, F. A., Markesbery, W. R., Liu, Q., Crook, J. E., Younkin, S. G., Bu, G., & Estus, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Estus, Steven
Venue
Molecular Neurodegeneration
Published
2009-11-04
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
46-46
ISSN
1750-1326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123056267
Cited by
56
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Molecular Neurodegeneration (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Kentucky
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG030128, P30AG028383, R01AG031784, R01AG026147, R01AG035355)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
SORL1, Alzheimer's disease, alternative splicing, single nucleotide polymorphisms, synaptophysin, white matter, cognitive impairment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review