The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial activities of commercial nanoparticles against an environmental soil microbe, Pseudomonas putida KT2440
Open accessAbstract
Background: The release of heavy metal-containing nanoparticles (NP) into the environment may be harmful to the efficacy of beneficial microbes that function in element cycling, pollutant degradation and plant growth. Nanoparticles of Ag, CuO and ZnO are of interest as antimicrobials against pathogenic bacteria. We demonstrate here their antimicrobial activity against the beneficial soil microbe, Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Results: Toxicity was detected in a KT2440 construct possessing a plasmid bearing the luxAB reporter genes. "As manufactured" preparations of nano- Ag, -CuO and -ZnO caused rapid dose-dependent loss of light output in the biosensor. Cell death accompanied loss in Lux activity with treatments by nano-Ag and -CuO, but with -ZnO the treatments were bacteriostatic rather than bactericidal. Bulk equivalents of these products showed no inhibitory activity, indicating that particle size was determinant in activity. Flow Field-Flow Fractionation (FlFFF) of an aqueous suspension of the nano-CuO and ZnO revealed a small proportion of 5 nm NP and aggregated particulates with sizes ranging between 70 nm and 300 nm; the majority portion of material was aggregated into particles larger than 300 nm in size. Thus within the commercial preparation there may be microbially active and inactive forms. Conclusion: The "as-made" NP of Ag, CuO and ZnO have toxic effects on a beneficial soil microbe, leading to bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects depending on the NP employed. The lack of toxicity from bulk materials suggests that aggregation of the NP into larger particles, possibly by factors present in the environment may reduce their nontarget antimicrobial activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions
Stohs, S. J., & Bagchi, D. (1995) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-h · Cited by 4,219
Cited by
A Review on Nanofluids: Preparation, Stability Mechanisms, and Applications
Yu, W., & Xie, H. (2012) · Journal of Nanomaterials · doi:10.1155/2012/435873 · Cited by 1,770
The risks associated with wastewater reuse and xenobiotics in the agroecological environment
Fatta-Kassinos, D., Kalavrouziotis, I. K., Koukoulakis, P. H., & Vasquez, M. I. (2011) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.036 · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Gajjar, P., Pettee, B., Britt, D. W., Huang, W., Johnson, W. P., & Anderson, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Engineering
- Published
- 2009-06-26
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-9
- ISSN
- 1754-1611 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073502306
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial activities of commercial nanoparticles against an environmental soil microbe, Pseudomonas putida KT2440. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1754-1611-3-9
- The paper
- Gajjar, P., Pettee, B., Britt, D. W., Huang, W., Johnson, W. P., & Anderson, A. J. (2009). Antimicrobial activities of commercial nanoparticles against an environmental soil microbe, Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Journal of Biological Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-3-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.