The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bioprospecting metagenomes: glycosyl hydrolases for converting biomass
Open accessAbstract
Throughout immeasurable time, microorganisms evolved and accumulated remarkable physiological and functional heterogeneity, and now constitute the major reserve for genetic diversity on earth. Using metagenomics, namely genetic material recovered directly from environmental samples, this biogenetic diversification can be accessed without the need to cultivate cells. Accordingly, microbial communities and their metagenomes, isolated from biotopes with high turnover rates of recalcitrant biomass, such as lignocellulosic plant cell walls, have become a major resource for bioprospecting; furthermore, this material is a major asset in the search for new biocatalytics (enzymes) for various industrial processes, including the production of biofuels from plant feedstocks. However, despite the contributions from metagenomics technologies consequent upon the discovery of novel enzymes, this relatively new enterprise requires major improvements. In this review, we compare function-based metagenome screening and sequence-based metagenome data mining, discussing the advantages and limitations of both methods. We also describe the unusual enzymes discovered via metagenomics approaches, and discuss the future prospects for metagenome technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prokaryotes: The unseen majority
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871 · cited 1×
“Estimates suggest that approximately 4–6 × 1030 prokaryotes inhabit the earth [2].”
BackgroundEnvironmental genome shotgun sequencing of the sargasso sea
Venter, J. C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J. F., Halpern, A. L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J. A., Wu, D., Paulsen, I., Nelson, K. E., Nelson, W., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093857 · Cited by 4,376
Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment
Tyson, G. W., Chapman, J., Hugenholtz, P., Allen, E. E., Ram, R. J., Richardson, P. M., Solovyev, V. V., Rubin, E. M., Rokhsar, D. S., & Banfield, J. F. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02340 · Cited by 2,417
Zengler, K., Toledo, G., Rappé, M., Elkins, J., Mathur, E. J., Short, J. M., & Keller, M. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252630999 · Cited by 796
Cited by
Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju
Menzel, P., Ng, K. L., & Krogh, A. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11257 · Cited by 2,118
Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen
Hess, M., Sczyrba, A., Egan, R., Kim, T.-W., Chokhawala, H., Schroth, G., Luo, S., Clark, D. S., Chen, F., Zhang, T., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200387 · Cited by 1,319
Biotechnological uses of enzymes from psychrophiles
Cavicchioli, R., Charlton, T., Ertan, H., Omar, S. M., Siddiqui, K. S., & Williams, T. J. (2011) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00258.x · Cited by 355
1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life
Mukherjee, S., Seshadri, R., Varghese, N. J., Eloe-Fadrosh, E. A., Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Göker, M., Coates, R. C., Hadjithomas, M., Pavlopoulos, G. A., Paez-Espino, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3886 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L.-L., McCorkle, S. R., Monchy, S., Taghavi, S., & van der Lelie, D.
- Venue
- Biotechnology for Biofuels
- Published
- 2009-05-18
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-10
- ISSN
- 1754-6834 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169762780
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioprospecting metagenomes: glycosyl hydrolases for converting biomass. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1754-6834-2-10
- The paper
- Li, L.-L., McCorkle, S. R., Monchy, S., Taghavi, S., & van der Lelie, D. (2009). Bioprospecting metagenomes: glycosyl hydrolases for converting biomass. Biotechnology for Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-2-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.