The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of ammonia fibre expansion (AFEX) pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass harvested in different seasons and locations
Open accessAbstract
Background: When producing biofuels from dedicated feedstock, agronomic factors such as harvest time and location can impact the downstream production. Thus, this paper studies the effectiveness of ammonia fibre expansion (AFEX) pretreatment on two harvest times (July and October) and ecotypes/locations (Cave-in-Rock (CIR) harvested in Michigan and Alamo harvested in Alabama) for switchgrass (Panicum virgatum). Results: Both harvest date and ecotype/location determine the pretreatment conditions that produce maximum sugar yields. There was a high degree of correlation between glucose and xylose released regardless of the harvest, pretreatment conditions, or enzyme formulation. Enzyme formulation that produced maximum sugar yields was the same across all harvests except for the CIR October harvest. The least mature sample, the July harvest of CIR switchgrass, released the most sugars (520 g/kg biomass) during enzymatic hydrolysis while requiring the least severe pretreatment conditions. In contrast, the most mature harvest released the least amount of sugars (410 g/kg biomass). All hydrolysates were highly fermentable, although xylose utilisation in the July CIR hydrolysate was poor. Conclusions: Each harvest type and location responded differently to AFEX pretreatment, although all harvests successfully produced fermentable sugars. Thus, it is necessary to consider an integrated approach between agricultural production and biochemical processing in order to insure optimal productivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251
Dien, B. S., Jung, H.-J. G., Vogel, K. P., Casler, M. D., Lamb, J. F. S., Iten, L., Mitchell, R. B., & Sarath, G. (2006) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.02.004 · Cited by 491
Fike, J. H., Parrish, D. J., Wolf, D. D., Balasko, J. A., Green, J. T., Rasnake, M., & Reynolds, J. H. (2006) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.10.008 · Cited by 200
Cited by
Singh, J., Suhag, M., & Dhaka, A. (2015) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.012 · Cited by 462
da Silva, A. S., Espinheira, R. P., Teixeira, R. S. S., de Souza, M. F., Ferreira-Leitão, V., & Bon, E. P. S. (2020) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-020-01697-w · Cited by 322
Urbina, L., Corcuera, M. Á., Gabilondo, N., Eceiza, A., & Retegi, A. (2021) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-021-04020-4 · Cited by 201
Wang, M., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Xia, Q., Bi, W., Yang, X., & Chen, D. D. Y. (2016) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2016.03.061 · Cited by 108
Lask, J., Wagner, M., Trindade, L. M., & Lewandowski, I. (2019) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12551 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Bals, B., Rogers, C., Jin, M., Balan, V., & Dale, B.
- Venue
- Biotechnology for Biofuels
- Published
- 2010-01-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1754-6834 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145754953
- Cited by
- 749
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 28.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of ammonia fibre expansion (AFEX) pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass harvested in different seasons and locations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1754-6834-3-1
- The paper
- Bals, B., Rogers, C., Jin, M., Balan, V., & Dale, B. (2010). Evaluation of ammonia fibre expansion (AFEX) pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass harvested in different seasons and locations. Biotechnology for Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-3-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.