The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethanol production from mixtures of wheat straw and wheat meal
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Bioethanol can be produced from sugar-rich, starch-rich (first generation; 1G) or lignocellulosic (second generation; 2G) raw materials. Integration of 2G ethanol with 1G could facilitate the introduction of the 2G technology. The capital cost per ton of fuel produced would be diminished and better utilization of the biomass can be achieved. It would, furthermore, decrease the energy demand of 2G ethanol production and also provide both 1G and 2G plants with heat and electricity. In the current study, steam-pretreated wheat straw (SPWS) was mixed with presaccharified wheat meal (PWM) and converted to ethanol in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF). RESULTS: Both the ethanol concentration and the ethanol yield increased with increasing amounts of PWM in mixtures with SPWS. The maximum ethanol yield (99% of the theoretical yield, based on the available C6 sugars) was obtained with a mixture of SPWS containing 2.5% water-insoluble solids (WIS) and PWM containing 2.5% WIS, resulting in an ethanol concentration of 56.5 g/L. This yield was higher than those obtained with SSF of either SPWS (68%) or PWM alone (91%). CONCLUSIONS: Mixing wheat straw with wheat meal would be beneficial for both 1G and 2G ethanol production. However, increasing the proportion of WIS as wheat straw and the possibility of consuming the xylose fraction with a pentose-fermenting yeast should be further investigated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar
Miller, G. L. (1959) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60147a030 · Cited by 28,963
Techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from three different lignocellulosic materials
Sassner, P., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2008) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.10.014 · Cited by 453
Self-citationProcess Engineering Economics of Bioethanol Production
Galbe, M., Sassner, P., Wingren, A., & Zacchi, G. (2007) · Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/10_2007_063 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Cited by
Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: An overview
Sarkar, N., Ghosh, S. K., Bannerjee, S., & Aikat, K. (2012) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.045 · Cited by 1,781
Ayodele, B. V., Alsaffar, M. A., & Mustapa, S. I. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118857 · Cited by 250
Integrated biorefinery approaches for the industrialization of cellulosic ethanol fuel
Qiao, J., Cui, H., Wang, M., Fu, X., Wang, X., Li, X., & Huang, H. (2022) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127516 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Erdei, B., Barta, Z., Sipos, B., Réczey, K., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G.
- Venue
- Biotechnology for Biofuels
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16
- ISSN
- 1754-6834 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098548757
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethanol production from mixtures of wheat straw and wheat meal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1754-6834-3-16
- The paper
- Erdei, B., Barta, Z., Sipos, B., Réczey, K., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2010). Ethanol production from mixtures of wheat straw and wheat meal. Biotechnology for Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-3-16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.