The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A versatile toolkit for high throughput functional genomics with Trichoderma reesei
Open accessAbstract
Background: The ascomycete fungus, Trichoderma reesei (anamorph of Hypocrea jecorina), represents a biotechnological workhorse and is currently one of the most proficient cellulase producers. While strain improvement was traditionally accomplished by random mutagenesis, a detailed understanding of cellulase regulation can only be gained using recombinant technologies. Results: Aiming at high efficiency and high throughput methods, we present here a construction kit for gene knock out in T. reesei. We provide a primer database for gene deletion using the pyr4, amdS and hph selection markers. For high throughput generation of gene knock outs, we constructed vectors using yeast mediated recombination and then transformed a T. reesei strain deficient in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) by spore electroporation. This NHEJ-defect was subsequently removed by crossing of mutants with a sexually competent strain derived from the parental strain, QM9414. Conclusions: Using this strategy and the materials provided, high throughput gene deletion in T. reesei becomes feasible. Moreover, with the application of sexual development, the NHEJ-defect can be removed efficiently and without the need for additional selection markers. The same advantages apply for the construction of multiple mutants by crossing of strains with different gene deletions, which is now possible with considerably less hands-on time and minimal screening effort compared to a transformation approach. Consequently this toolkit can considerably boost research towards efficient exploitation of the resources of T. reesei for cellulase expression and hence second generation biofuel production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bio-jet fuel conversion technologies
Wang, W.-C., & Tao, L. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.016 · Cited by 564
Cost effective technologies and renewable substrates for biosurfactants’ production
Banat, I. M., Satpute, S. K., Cameotra, S. S., Patil, R., & Nyayanit, N. V. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00697 · Cited by 461
da Silva, A. S., Espinheira, R. P., Teixeira, R. S. S., de Souza, M. F., Ferreira-Leitão, V., & Bon, E. P. S. (2020) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-020-01697-w · Cited by 322
Lewandowski, I., Clifton-Brown, J., Trindade, L. M., van der Linden, G. C., Schwarz, K.-U., Müller-Sämann, K., Anisimov, A., Chen, C.-L., Dolstra, O., Donnison, I. S., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01620 · Cited by 214
Atsonios, K., Kougioumtzis, M.-A., D. Panopoulos, K., & Kakaras, E. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.056 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuster, A., Bruno, K. S., Collett, J. R., Baker, S. E., Seiboth, B., Kubicek, C. P., & Schmoll, M.
- Venue
- Biotechnology for Biofuels
- Published
- 2012-01-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1754-6834 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036875488
- Cited by
- 833
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A versatile toolkit for high throughput functional genomics with Trichoderma reesei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1754-6834-5-1
- The paper
- Schuster, A., Bruno, K. S., Collett, J. R., Baker, S. E., Seiboth, B., Kubicek, C. P., & Schmoll, M. (2012). A versatile toolkit for high throughput functional genomics with Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnology for Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.