The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analyses and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses are necessary to synthesize data obtained from primary research, and in many situations reviews of observational studies are the only available alternative. General purpose statistical packages can meta-analyze data, but usually require external macros or coding. Commercial specialist software is available, but may be expensive and focused in a particular type of primary data. Most available softwares have limitations in dealing with descriptive data, and the graphical display of summary statistics such as incidence and prevalence is unsatisfactory. Analyses can be conducted using Microsoft Excel, but there was no previous guide available. FINDINGS: We constructed a step-by-step guide to perform a meta-analysis in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, using either fixed-effect or random-effects models. We have also developed a second spreadsheet capable of producing customized forest plots. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to conduct a meta-analysis using only Microsoft Excel. More important, to our knowledge this is the first description of a method for producing a statistically adequate but graphically appealing forest plot summarizing descriptive data, using widely available software.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐Analysis in Context
(2001) · doi:10.1002/9780470693926 · Cited by 1,693
Bax, L., Yu, L.-M., Ikeda, N., Tsuruta, H., & Moons, K. G. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-50 · Cited by 514
Forest plots in reports of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study reviewing current practice
Schriger, D. L., Altman, D. G., Vetter, J. A., Heafner, T., & Moher, D. (2010) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyp370 · Cited by 87 · cited 1×
“A recently published paper by Schriger et al [11] reviewed over 300 systematic reviews and highlighted important aspects of producing forest plots, which were considered in developing this approach.”
Background
Cited by
Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: a meta-analysis
Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029 · Cited by 802
Franz, M. J., Boucher, J. L., Rutten-Ramos, S., & VanWormer, J. J. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2015.02.031 · Cited by 672
The incidence and prevalence of psychiatric disorders in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
Marrie, R. A., Reingold, S., Cohen, J., Stuve, O., Trojano, M., Sorensen, P. S., Cutter, G., & Reider, N. (2015) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458514564487 · Cited by 519
Al Maqbali, M., Al Sinani, M., & Al-Lenjawi, B. (2021) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110343 · Cited by 501
Dialectical behavior therapy is effective for the treatment of suicidal behavior: A meta-analysis
DeCou, C. R., Comtois, K. A., & Landes, S. J. (2019) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.009 · Cited by 439
Metadata
- Authors
- Neyeloff, J. L., Fuchs, S. C., & Moreira, L. B.
- Venue
- BMC Research Notes
- Published
- 2012-01-20
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-52
- ISSN
- 1756-0500 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989230896
- Cited by
- 727
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 45.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-analyses and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1756-0500-5-52
- The paper
- Neyeloff, J. L., Fuchs, S. C., & Moreira, L. B. (2012). Meta-analyses and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. BMC Research Notes. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-52
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.