The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of midgut bacteria to blood digestion and egg production in Aedes aegypti (diptera: culicidae) (L.)
Open accessAbstract
Background: The insect gut harbors a variety of microorganisms that probably exceed the number of cells in insects themselves. These microorganisms can live and multiply in the insect, contributing to digestion, nutrition, and development of their host. Recent studies have shown that midgut bacteria appear to strengthen the mosquito's immune system and indirectly enhance protection from invading pathogens. Nevertheless, the physiological significance of these bacteria for mosquitoes has not been established to date. In this study, oral administration of antibiotics was employed in order to examine the contribution of gut bacteria to blood digestion and fecundity in Aedes aegypti. Results: The antibiotics carbenicillin, tetracycline, spectinomycin, gentamycin and kanamycin, were individually offered to female mosquitoes. Treatment of female mosquitoes with antibiotics affected the lysis of red blood cells (RBCs), retarded the digestion of blood proteins and reduced egg production. In addition, antibiotics did not affect the survival of mosquitoes. Mosquito fertility was restored in the second gonotrophic cycle after suspension of the antibiotic treatment, showing that the negative effects of antibiotics in blood digestion and egg production in the first gonotrophic cycle were reversible. Conclusions: The reduction of bacteria affected RBC lysis, subsequently retarded protein digestion, deprived mosquito from essential nutrients and, finally, oocyte maturation was affected, resulting in the production of fewer viable eggs. These results indicate that Ae. aegypti and its midgut bacteria work in synergism to digest a blood meal. Our findings open new possibilities to investigate Ae. aegypti-associated bacteria as targets for mosquito control strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PROTEIN MEASUREMENT WITH THE FOLIN PHENOL REAGENT
Lowry, O., Rosebrough, N., Farr, A. L., & Randall, R. (1951) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)52451-6 · Cited by 317,331
Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4
LAEMMLI, U. K. (1970) · Nature · doi:10.1038/227680a0 · Cited by 249,961
Raza, H., John, A., & Nemmar, A. (2013) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000350087 · Cited by 47,221
T HE G UT B ACTERIA OF I NSECTS: Nonpathogenic Interactions
Dillon, R. J., & Dillon, V. M. (2004) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123416 · Cited by 1,411
The Role of Hemocytes in Anopheles gambiae Antiplasmodial Immunity
Ramirez, J. L., Garver, L. S., Brayner, F. A., Alves, L. C., Rodrigues, J., Molina-Cruz, A., & Barillas-Mury, C. (2014) · Journal of Innate Immunity · doi:10.1159/000353765 · Cited by 1,084
The microbial dimension in insect nutritional ecology
Douglas, A. E. (2009) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01442.x · Cited by 842
Implication of the Mosquito Midgut Microbiota in the Defense against Malaria Parasites
Dong, Y., Manfredini, F., & Dimopoulos, G. (2009) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000423 · Cited by 801
Accumulation of Yolk Proteins in Insect Oocytes
Raikhel, A. S., & Dhadialla, T. S. (1992) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.001245 · Cited by 742
Favia, G., Ricci, I., Damiani, C., Raddadi, N., Crotti, E., Marzorati, M., Rizzi, A., Urso, R., Brusetti, L., Borin, S., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610451104 · Cited by 471
Hemocyte Differentiation Mediates Innate Immune Memory in Anopheles gambiae Mosquitoes
Rodrigues, J., Brayner, F. A., Alves, L. C., Dixit, R., & Barillas-Mury, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1190689 · Cited by 460
Cited by
The gut microbiota of insects – diversity in structure and function
Engel, P., & Moran, N. A. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12025 · Cited by 2,595
Araújo, M. F., Castanheira, E. M. S., & Sousa, S. F. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28083641 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaio, A. D. O., Gusmão, D. S., Santos, A. V., Berbert-Molina, M. A., Pimenta, P. F., & Lemos, F. J.
- Venue
- Parasites & Vectors
- Published
- 2011-06-14
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-105
- ISSN
- 1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135691147
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of midgut bacteria to blood digestion and egg production in Aedes aegypti (diptera: culicidae) (L.). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1756-3305-4-105
- The paper
- Gaio, A. D. O., Gusmão, D. S., Santos, A. V., Berbert-Molina, M. A., Pimenta, P. F., & Lemos, F. J. (2011). Contribution of midgut bacteria to blood digestion and egg production in Aedes aegypti (diptera: culicidae) (L.). Parasites & Vectors. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.