Transcriptomic evidence for immaturity of the prefrontal cortex in patients with schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia, a severe psychiatric disorder, has a lifetime prevalence of 1%. The exact mechanisms underlying this disorder remain unknown, though theories abound. Recent studies suggest that particular cell types and biological processes in the schizophrenic cortex have a pseudo-immature status in which the molecular properties partially resemble those in the normal immature brain. However, genome-wide gene expression patterns in the brains of patients with schizophrenia and those of normal infants have not been directly compared. Here, we show that the gene expression patterns in the schizophrenic prefrontal cortex (PFC) resemble those in the juvenile PFC. RESULTS: We conducted a gene expression meta-analysis in which, using microarray data derived from different studies, altered expression patterns in the dorsolateral PFC (DLFC) of patients with schizophrenia were compared with those in the DLFC of developing normal human brains, revealing a striking similarity. The results were replicated in a second DLFC data set and a medial PFC (MFC) data set. We also found that about half of the genes representing the transcriptomic immaturity of the schizophrenic PFC were developmentally regulated in fast-spiking interneurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. Furthermore, to test whether medications, which often confound the results of postmortem analyses, affect on the juvenile-like gene expressions in the schizophrenic PFC, we compared the gene expression patterns showing transcriptomic immaturity in the schizophrenic PFC with those in the PFC of rodents treated with antipsychotic drugs. The results showed no apparent similarities between the two conditions, suggesting that the juvenile-like gene expression patterns observed in the schizophrenic PFC could not be accounted for by medication effects. Moreover, the developing human PFC showed a gene expression pattern similar to that of the PFC of naive Schnurri-2 knockout mice, an animal model of schizophrenia with good face and construct validity. This result also supports the idea that the transcriptomic immaturity of the schizophrenic PFC is not due to medication effects. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our results provide evidence that pseudo-immaturity of the PFC resembling juvenile PFC may be an endophenotype of schizophrenia.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pathophysiological changes are consistent with dematuration or removal of brakes on plasticity.
“Pathophysiological changes (1–3) are consistent with ‘dematuration’ or a removal of ‘brakes’ on plasticity (72, 73).”
From Prolonged Period of Cortical Plasticity upon Redox Dysregulation in Fast-Spiking Interneurons (2015) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 52
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Stefansson H Ophoff RA Steinberg S Andreassen OA Cichon S Rujescu D Werge T Pietiläinen OPH Mors O Mortensen PB Sigurdsson E Gustafsson O Nyegaard M Tuulio-Henriksson A Ingason A Hansen T Suvisaari J Lonnqvist J Paunio T Børglum AD Hartmann A Fink-Jensen A Nordentoft M Hougaard D Norgaard-Pedersen B Böttcher Y Olesen J Breuer R Möller H-J Giegling I Common variants conferring risk of schizophrenia Nature 2009 460 744 747 19571808 PMC3077530
- Authors
- Hagihara, H., Ohira, K., Takao, K., & Miyakawa, T.
- Affiliations
- Fujita Health University (JP)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Miyakawa, Tsuyoshi
- Venue
- Molecular Brain
- Published
- 2014-05-29
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-41
- ISSN
- 1756-6606 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4066280
- OpenAlex
- W2153711771
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Molecular Brain (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (25116526, CREST)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25116526, 25242078, 25350989)
- Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, gene expression, brain development, fast-spiking interneurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, antipsychotic drugs, endophenotypes, postmortem brain
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Animals, Child, Preschool, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Infant, Middle Aged, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Signal Transduction, Prefrontal Cortex, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Young Adult, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review