MicroRNA expression distinguishes SCLC from NSCLC lung tumor cells and suggests a possible pathological relationship between SCLCs and NSCLCs
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) play roles in tumorigenesis and are reliable classifiers of certain cancer types and subtypes. However, the role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of small cell carcinoma (SCLC), the majority of which represent the most aggressive lung tumors, has not been investigated. METHODS: In order to explore miRNA involvement in the pathogenesis of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and the potential role of miRNAs in SCLC diagnosis, we compared the miRNA expression profile of a set of SCLC cell lines to that of a set of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines and normal immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) using microarray analysis. RESULTS: Our results show that miRNA profiles reliably distinguish SCLC cell lines from NSCLC and HBEC cell lines. Further analysis of the miRNA expression profile of the two subtypes of lung cancer cell lines indicates that the expression levels of the majority of the miRNAs that are differentially expressed in SCLC cells relative to NSCLC cells and HBECs show a progressive trend from HBECs to NSCLC cells to SCLC cells. CONCLUSIONS: The distinctive miRNA expression signature of SCLCs relative to NSCLCs and HBECs suggests that miRNA profiles have the potential to serve as a diagnostic marker of SCLC lung tumors. The progressive trend of miRNA profile changes from HBECs to NSCLCs to SCLCs suggests a possible pathological relationship between SCLCs and NSCLCs, and suggests that the increasing dysregulation of miRNA expression may play a role in lung tumor progression. The specific role of these miRNAs in lung tumor pathogenesis and differentiation need to be investigated further in future studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The selected miRNAs represent the five most upregulated and downregulated miRNAs in adenocarcinoma versus SCLC cell lines.
“These miRNAs represent the five most upregulated and downregulated in adenocarcinoma vs SCLC cell lines, respectively17.”
From RB loss in resistant EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinomas that transform to small-cell lung cancer (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 85 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Du, L., Schageman, J. J., Irnov, Girard, L., Hammond, S. M., Minna, J. D., Gazdar, A. F., & Pertsemlidis, A.
- Affiliations
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Du, Liqin
- Pertsemlidis, Alexander
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2010-06-17
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-75
- ISSN
- 0392-9078 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-9966
- PMC
- PMC2907339
- OpenAlex
- W2116996417
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- National Institutes of Health (CA70907)
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
- National Cancer Institute ((P50-CA70907, CA 70907, R01CA129632, P50CA070907)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- Keywords
- microRNA expression, small cell lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, lung cancer cell lines, diagnostic biomarkers, microRNA signature, tumor differentiation, bronchial epithelial cells
- MeSH terms
- Bronchi, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Cells, Cultured, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, RNA, Messenger, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, MicroRNAs, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review