Cited by 349Computational Drug Discovery MethodsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Drug repositioning: a machine-learning approach through data integration

Open access
Napolitano, Francesco, Zhao, Yan, Moreira, Vânia M, Tagliaferri, Roberto, Kere, Juha, D’Amato, Mauro, Greco, Dario·2013·Journal of Cheminformatics

Abstract

Existing computational methods for drug repositioning either rely only on the gene expression response of cell lines after treatment, or on drug-to-disease relationships, merging several information levels. However, the noisy nature of the gene expression and the scarcity of genomic data for many diseases are important limitations to such approaches. Here we focused on a drug-centered approach by predicting the therapeutic class of FDA-approved compounds, not considering data concerning the diseases. We propose a novel computational approach to predict drug repositioning based on state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithms. We have integrated multiple layers of information: i) on the distances of the drugs based on how similar are their chemical structures, ii) on how close are their targets within the protein-protein interaction network, and iii) on how correlated are the gene expression patterns after treatment. Our classifier reaches high accuracy levels (78%), allowing us to re-interpret the top misclassifications as re-classifications, after rigorous statistical evaluation. Efficient drug repurposing has the potential to significantly impact the whole field of drug development. The results presented here can significantly accelerate the translation into the clinics of known compounds for novel therapeutic uses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1758-2946-5-30

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning can learn from almost any data type, such as research papers, patient records, images, genes, symptoms, diseases, proteins, tissues, species and drug candidates or compounds that have been shown to affect any of the preceding.

    “Machine learning can learn from almost any data type, such as that from research papers, patient records, images, genes, symptoms, diseases, proteins, tissues, species and drug candidates or compounds that have been shown to affect any of the preceding74.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 349

Authors
Napolitano, F., Zhao, Y., Moreira, V. M., Tagliaferri, R., Kere, J., D’Amato, M., & Greco, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Salerno (IT)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Greco, Dario
Venue
Journal of Cheminformatics
Published
2013-06-22
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
30-30
ISSN
1758-2946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100929382
Cited by
349
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI
16.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cheminformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (228398)
  • Academy of Finland
  • Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
  • Ella ja Georg Ehrnroothin Säätiö
  • Magnus Ehrnroothin Säätiö
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
drug repurposing, machine learning classification, molecular similarity, protein-protein interaction network, gene expression response, drug-target interactions, FDA-approved drugs, data integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review