The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating the effects of mobile bottom fishing on benthic biota: a systematic review protocol
Abstract
Mobile bottom fishing, such as trawling and dredging, is the most widespread direct human impact on marine benthic systems. Knowledge of the impacts of different gear types on different habitats, the species most sensitive to impacts and the potential for habitats to recover are often needed to inform implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries and strategies for biodiversity conservation. This knowledge helps to identify management options that maximise fisheries yield whilst minimising negative impacts on benthic systems. The methods are designed to identify and collate evidence from experimental studies (e.g. before/after, control/impact) and comparative studies (spanning a gradient of fishing intensity) to identify changes in state (numbers, biomass, diversity etc.) of benthic biota (flora and fauna), resulting from a variety of mobile bottom fishing scenarios. The primary research question that the outputs will be used to address is: “to what extent does a given intensity of bottom fishing affect the abundance and/or diversity of benthic biota?” Due to the variety of gear and habitat types studied, the primary question will be closely linked with secondary questions. These include: “how does the effect of bottom fishing on various benthic biota metrics (species, faunal type, trait, taxon etc.) vary with (1) gear type and (2) habitat, and (3) gear type-habitat interactions?” and (4) “how might properties of the community and environment affect the resilience (and recovery potential) of a community to bottom fishing?”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Systematic reviews typically screen the first 50 to 100 search records within Google Scholar e.g. [18,19,20], sometimes restricting searches to title rather than full-text searches e.g. [21].”
From The role of google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching (2015) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
The Effects of Fishing on Marine Ecosystems
Jennings, S., & Kaiser, M. J. (1998) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(08)60212-6 · Cited by 1,502
Self-citationHandbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution
(2013) · doi:10.1515/9781400846184 · Cited by 1,183
Guidelines for systematic review in Conservation and environmental management
PULLIN, A. S., & STEWART, G. B. (2006) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x · Cited by 1,137
Thrush, S. F., & Dayton, P. K. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150515 · Cited by 779
Environmental effects of marine fishing
Dayton, P. K., Thrush, S. F., Agardy, M. T., & Hofman, R. J. (1995) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.3270050305 · Cited by 773
Global analysis of response and recovery of benthic biota to fishing
Kaiser, M., Clarke, K., Hinz, H., Austen, M., Somerfield, P., & Karakassis, I. (2006) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps311001 · Cited by 636
Self-citationA quantitative analysis of fishing impacts on shelf‐sea benthos
Collie, J. S., Hall, S. J., Kaiser, M. J., & Poiner, I. R. (2000) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00434.x · Cited by 627
Self-citationA revised concept of landscape equilibrium: Disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes
Turner, M. G., Romme, W. H., Gardner, R. H., O'Neill, R. V., & Kratz, T. K. (1993) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf00125352 · Cited by 519
Environmental impact of trawling on the seabed: A review
Jones, J. B. (1992) · New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1080/00288330.1992.9516500 · Cited by 447
Cited by
The role of google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138237 · Cited by 2,387
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, K. M., Kaiser, M. J., Jennings, S., McConnaughey, R. A., Pitcher, R., Hilborn, R., Amoroso, R. O., Collie, J., Hiddink, J., Parma, A. M., & Rijnsdorp, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Evidence
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23
- ISSN
- 2047-2382
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 26
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating the effects of mobile bottom fishing on benthic biota: a systematic review protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/2047-2382-3-23
- The paper
- Hughes, K. M., Kaiser, M. J., Jennings, S., McConnaughey, R. A., Pitcher, R., Hilborn, R., Amoroso, R. O., Collie, J., Hiddink, J., Parma, A. M., & Rijnsdorp, A. (2014). Investigating the effects of mobile bottom fishing on benthic biota: a systematic review protocol. Environmental Evidence. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2382-3-23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.

