Cited by 61Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Early experience, structural dissociation, and emotional dysregulation in borderline personality disorder: the role of insecure and disorganized attachment

Open access
Mosquera, Dolores, Gonzalez, Anabel, Leeds, Andrew M·2014·Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation

Abstract

Persistent problems in emotional regulation and interpersonal relationships in borderline patients can be understood as developing from difficulties in early dyadic regulation with primary caregivers. Early attachment patterns are a relevant causal factor in the development of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Links between attachment issues, early history of neglect, and traumatic experiences, and symptoms observed in patients with BPD as per the DSM-5 classification (American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (Fifth ed.). Washington, D.C; (2013)) are described in this article, while delineating possible pathways from attachment disruptions to the specific symptomatology of these patients. The theory of structural dissociation of the personality (TSDP) provides an essential framework for understanding the processes that may lead from insecure early attachment to the development and maintenance of BPD symptoms. Dyadic parent-child interactions and subsequent modulation of emotion in the child and future adult are considered closely related, but other factors in the development of BPD, such as genetic predisposition and traumatic experiences, should also be considered in conceptualizing and organizing clinical approaches based on a view of BPD as a heterogeneous disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/2051-6673-1-15

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • "Transient dissociative symptoms related to extreme stress and real or imagined abandonment" are cardinal symptoms of BPD, although tending to occur primarily for BPD-diagnosed individuals who have a history of childhood abuse.

    ““Transient dissociative symptoms related to extreme stress and real or imagined abandonment” ([3], p. 664) are cardinal symptoms of BPD, although tending to occur primarily for BPD-diagnosed individuals who have a history of childhood abuse [91, 119].”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [119]

    The Review section on attachment and self-regulation associates a dissociative subtype of BPD with disorganized attachment, and the Review section on differential effects links extreme dissociation to disorganized attachment combined with persistent childhood neglect and trauma. The paper does not establish that transient dissociative symptoms occur primarily in BPD patients with a history of childhood abuse specifically; its account also includes neglect and attachment disruption. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Attachment disorganization and emotion dysregulation both have been shown to be related to pathological dissociation.

    “Attachment disorganization [15, 115, 119] and emotion dysregulation [68, 69, 119, 188] both have been shown to be related to pathological dissociation.”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [119]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 61

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [23]Allport GW Personality and Social Encounter 1981 Chicago University of Chicago Press
  2. [36]Crittenden PM Peering into the Black Box: An Exploratory Treatise on the Development of the Self in Young Children Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology 1997

Authors
Mosquera, D., Gonzalez, A., & Leeds, A. M.
Corresponding author
Mosquera, Dolores
Venue
Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
Published
2014
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
15
ISSN
2051-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102526501
Cited by
61
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, emotional dysregulation, structural dissociation, insecure attachment, disorganized attachment, early attachment, parent-child interaction, child neglect, trauma, genetic susceptibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review