Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inspiratory muscle strength training improves weaning outcome in failure to wean patients: a randomized trial

Open access
Martin, A Daniel, Smith, Barbara K, Davenport, Paul D, Harman, Eloise, Gonzalez-Rothi, Ricardo J, Baz, Maher, Layon, A Joseph, Banner, Michael J, Caruso, Lawrence J, Deoghare, Harsha, Huang, Tseng-Tien, Gabrielli, Andrea·2011·Critical Care

Abstract

Introduction: Most patients are readily liberated from mechanical ventilation (MV) support, however, 10% - 15% of patients experience failure to wean (FTW). FTW patients account for approximately 40% of all MV days and have significantly worse clinical outcomes. MV induced inspiratory muscle weakness has been implicated as a contributor to FTW and recent work has documented inspiratory muscle weakness in humans supported with MV. Methods: We conducted a single center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial to test whether inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) would improve weaning outcome in FTW patients. Of 129 patients evaluated for participation, 69 were enrolled and studied. 35 subjects were randomly assigned to the IMST condition and 34 to the SHAM treatment. IMST was performed with a threshold inspiratory device, set at the highest pressure tolerated and progressed daily. SHAM training provided a constant, low inspiratory pressure load. Subjects completed 4 sets of 6-10 training breaths, 5 days per week. Subjects also performed progressively longer breathing trials daily per protocol. The weaning criterion was 72 consecutive hours without MV support. Subjects were blinded to group assignment, and were treated until weaned or 28 days. Results: Groups were comparable on demographic and clinical variables at baseline. The IMST and SHAM groups respectively received 41.9 ± 25.5 vs. 47.3 ± 33.0 days of MV support prior to starting intervention, P = 0.36. The IMST and SHAM groups participated in 9.7 ± 4.0 and 11.0 ± 4.8 training sessions, respectively, P = 0.09. The SHAM group's pre to post-training maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) change was not significant (-43.5 ± 17.8 vs. -45.1 ± 19.5 cm H 2 O, P = 0.39), while the IMST group's MIP increased (-44.4 ± 18.4 vs. -54.1 ± 17.8 cm H 2 O, P < 0.0001). There were no adverse events observed during IMST or SHAM treatments. Twenty-five of 35 IMST subjects weaned (71%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 55% to 84%), while 16 of 34 (47%, 95% CI = 31% to 63%) SHAM subjects weaned, P = .039. The number of patients needed to be treated for effect was 4 (95% CI = 2 to 80). Conclusions: An IMST program can lead to increased MIP and improved weaning outcome in FTW patients compared to SHAM treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00419458

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/cc10081

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Martin, A. D., Smith, B. K., Davenport, P. D., Harman, E., Gonzalez-Rothi, R. J., Baz, M., Layon, A. J., Banner, M. J., Caruso, L. J., Deoghare, H., Huang, T.-T., & Gabrielli, A.
Venue
Critical Care
Published
2011-03-07
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
R84-R84
ISSN
1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114147977
Cited by
294
References
40
FWCI
16.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inspiratory muscle strength training improves weaning outcome in failure to wean patients: a randomized trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/cc10081
The paper
Martin, A. D., Smith, B. K., Davenport, P. D., Harman, E., Gonzalez-Rothi, R. J., Baz, M., Layon, A. J., Banner, M. J., Caruso, L. J., Deoghare, H., Huang, T.-T., & Gabrielli, A. (2011). Inspiratory muscle strength training improves weaning outcome in failure to wean patients: a randomized trial. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10081

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.