Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Arterial hyperoxia and in-hospital mortality after resuscitation from cardiac arrest

Open access
Bellomo, Rinaldo, Bailey, Michael, Eastwood, Glenn M, Nichol, Alistair, Pilcher, David, Hart, Graeme K, Reade, Michael C, Egi, Moritoki, Cooper, James D, the Study of Oxygen in Critical Care (SOCC) Group·2011·Critical Care

Abstract

Introduction: Hyperoxia has recently been reported as an independent risk factor for mortality in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. We examined the independent relationship between hyperoxia and outcomes in such patients. Methods: We divided patients resuscitated from nontraumatic cardiac arrest from 125 intensive care units (ICUs) into three groups according to worst PaO 2 level or alveolar-arterial O 2 gradient in the first 24 hours after admission. We defined 'hyperoxia' as PaO 2 of 300 mmHg or greater, 'hypoxia/poor O 2 transfer' as either PaO 2 < 60 mmHg or ratio of PaO 2 to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) < 300, 'normoxia' as any value between hypoxia and hyperoxia and 'isolated hypoxemia' as PaO 2 < 60 mmHg regardless of FiO 2. Mortality at hospital discharge was the main outcome measure. Results: Of 12,108 total patients, 1,285 (10.6%) had hyperoxia, 8,904 (73.5%) had hypoxia/poor O 2 transfer, 1,919 (15.9%) had normoxia and 1,168 (9.7%) had isolated hypoxemia (PaO 2 < 60 mmHg). The hyperoxia group had higher mortality (754 (59%) of 1,285 patients; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 56% to 61%) than the normoxia group (911 (47%) of 1,919 patients; 95% CI, 45% to 50%) with a proportional difference of 11% (95% CI, 8% to 15%), but not higher than the hypoxia group (5,303 (60%) of 8,904 patients; 95% CI, 59% to 61%). In a multivariable model controlling for some potential confounders, including illness severity, hyperoxia had an odds ratio for hospital death of 1.2 (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.6). However, once we applied Cox proportional hazards modelling of survival, sensitivity analyses using deciles of hypoxemia, time period matching and hyperoxia defined as PaO 2 > 400 mmHg, hyperoxia had no independent association with mortality. Importantly, after adjustment for FiO 2 and the relevant covariates, PaO 2 was no longer predictive of hospital mortality (P = 0.21). Conclusions: Among patients admitted to the ICU after cardiac arrest, hyperoxia did not have a robust or consistently reproducible association with mortality. We urge caution in implementing policies of deliberate decreases in FiO 2 in these patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/cc10090

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Bellomo, R., Bailey, M., Eastwood, G. M., Nichol, A., Pilcher, D., Hart, G. K., Reade, M. C., Egi, M., Cooper, J. D., & the Study of Oxygen in Critical Care (SOCC) Group
Venue
Critical Care
Published
2011-03-08
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
R90-R90
ISSN
1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162275013
Cited by
309
References
0
FWCI
30.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arterial hyperoxia and in-hospital mortality after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/cc10090
The paper
Bellomo, R., Bailey, M., Eastwood, G. M., Nichol, A., Pilcher, D., Hart, G. K., Reade, M. C., Egi, M., Cooper, J. D., & the Study of Oxygen in Critical Care (SOCC) Group. (2011). Arterial hyperoxia and in-hospital mortality after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10090

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.