The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Arterial hyperoxia and in-hospital mortality after resuscitation from cardiac arrest
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Hyperoxia has recently been reported as an independent risk factor for mortality in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. We examined the independent relationship between hyperoxia and outcomes in such patients. Methods: We divided patients resuscitated from nontraumatic cardiac arrest from 125 intensive care units (ICUs) into three groups according to worst PaO 2 level or alveolar-arterial O 2 gradient in the first 24 hours after admission. We defined 'hyperoxia' as PaO 2 of 300 mmHg or greater, 'hypoxia/poor O 2 transfer' as either PaO 2 < 60 mmHg or ratio of PaO 2 to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) < 300, 'normoxia' as any value between hypoxia and hyperoxia and 'isolated hypoxemia' as PaO 2 < 60 mmHg regardless of FiO 2. Mortality at hospital discharge was the main outcome measure. Results: Of 12,108 total patients, 1,285 (10.6%) had hyperoxia, 8,904 (73.5%) had hypoxia/poor O 2 transfer, 1,919 (15.9%) had normoxia and 1,168 (9.7%) had isolated hypoxemia (PaO 2 < 60 mmHg). The hyperoxia group had higher mortality (754 (59%) of 1,285 patients; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 56% to 61%) than the normoxia group (911 (47%) of 1,919 patients; 95% CI, 45% to 50%) with a proportional difference of 11% (95% CI, 8% to 15%), but not higher than the hypoxia group (5,303 (60%) of 8,904 patients; 95% CI, 59% to 61%). In a multivariable model controlling for some potential confounders, including illness severity, hyperoxia had an odds ratio for hospital death of 1.2 (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.6). However, once we applied Cox proportional hazards modelling of survival, sensitivity analyses using deciles of hypoxemia, time period matching and hyperoxia defined as PaO 2 > 400 mmHg, hyperoxia had no independent association with mortality. Importantly, after adjustment for FiO 2 and the relevant covariates, PaO 2 was no longer predictive of hospital mortality (P = 0.21). Conclusions: Among patients admitted to the ICU after cardiac arrest, hyperoxia did not have a robust or consistently reproducible association with mortality. We urge caution in implementing policies of deliberate decreases in FiO 2 in these patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Relationship Between Supranormal Oxygen Tension and Outcome After Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest
Kilgannon, J. H., Jones, A. E., Parrillo, J. E., Dellinger, R. P., Milcarek, B., Hunter, K., Shapiro, N. I., & Trzeciak, S. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.001016 · Cited by 320
Bench-to-bedside review: the effects of hyperoxia during critical illness
Helmerhorst, H. J. F., Schultz, M. J., van der Voort, P. H. J., de Jonge, E., & van Westerloo, D. J. (2015) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0996-4 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellomo, R., Bailey, M., Eastwood, G. M., Nichol, A., Pilcher, D., Hart, G. K., Reade, M. C., Egi, M., Cooper, J. D., & the Study of Oxygen in Critical Care (SOCC) Group
- Venue
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2011-03-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- R90-R90
- ISSN
- 1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162275013
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arterial hyperoxia and in-hospital mortality after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/cc10090
- The paper
- Bellomo, R., Bailey, M., Eastwood, G. M., Nichol, A., Pilcher, D., Hart, G. K., Reade, M. C., Egi, M., Cooper, J. D., & the Study of Oxygen in Critical Care (SOCC) Group. (2011). Arterial hyperoxia and in-hospital mortality after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.