Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and Standardization of a Furosemide Stress Test to Predict the Severity of Acute Kidney Injury

Open access
Chawla, Lakhmir S, Davison, Danielle L, Brasha-Mitchell, Ermira, Koyner, Jay L, Arthur, John M, Shaw, Andrew D, Tumlin, James A, Trevino, Sharon A, Kimmel, Paul L, Seneff, Michael G·2013·Critical Care

Abstract

Introduction: In the setting of early acute kidney injury (AKI), no test has been shown to definitively predict the progression to more severe stages. Methods: We investigated the ability of a furosemide stress test (FST) (one-time dose of 1.0 or 1.5 mg/kg depending on prior furosemide-exposure) to predict the development of AKIN Stage-III in 2 cohorts of critically ill subjects with early AKI. Cohort 1 was a retrospective cohort who received a FST in the setting of AKI in critically ill patients as part of Southern AKI Network. Cohort 2 was a prospective multicenter group of critically ill patients who received their FST in the setting of early AKI. Results: We studied 77 subjects; 23 from cohort 1 and 54 from cohort 2; 25 (32.4%) met the primary endpoint of progression to AKIN-III. Subjects with progressive AKI had significantly lower urine output following FST in each of the first 6 hours (p<0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curves for the total urine output over the first 2 hours following FST to predict progression to AKIN-III was 0.87 (p = 0.001). The ideal-cutoff for predicting AKI progression during the first 2 hours following FST was a urine volume of less than 200mls(100ml/hr) with a sensitivity of 87.1% and specificity 84.1%. Conclusions: The FST in subjects with early AKI serves as a novel assessment of tubular function with robust predictive capacity to identify those patients with severe and progressive AKI. Future studies to validate these findings are warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/cc13015

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Chawla, L. S., Davison, D. L., Brasha-Mitchell, E., Koyner, J. L., Arthur, J. M., Shaw, A. D., Tumlin, J. A., Trevino, S. A., Kimmel, P. L., & Seneff, M. G.
Venue
Critical Care
Published
2013-09-20
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
R207-R207
ISSN
1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118172844
Cited by
398
References
25
FWCI
10.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Standardization of a Furosemide Stress Test to Predict the Severity of Acute Kidney Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/cc13015
The paper
Chawla, L. S., Davison, D. L., Brasha-Mitchell, E., Koyner, J. L., Arthur, J. M., Shaw, A. D., Tumlin, J. A., Trevino, S. A., Kimmel, P. L., & Seneff, M. G. (2013). Development and Standardization of a Furosemide Stress Test to Predict the Severity of Acute Kidney Injury. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.