The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) plasma concentrations at different SOFA scores during the course of sepsis and MODS
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: The relation of procalcitonin (PCT) plasma concentrations compared with C-reactive protein (CRP) was analyzed in patients with different severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and systemic inflammation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PCT, CRP, the sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, the Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and survival were evaluated in 40 patients with systemic inflammation and consecutive MODS over a period of 15 days. RESULTS: Higher SOFA score levels were associated with significantly higher PCT plasma concentrations (SOFA 7-12: PCT 2.62 ng/ml, SOFA 19-24: PCT 15.22 ng/ml) (median), whereas CRP was elevated irrespective of the scores observed (SOFT 7-12: CRP 131 mg/l, SOFT 19-24: CRP 135 mg/l). PCT of non-surviving patients was initially not different from that of survivors but significantly increased after the fourth day following onset of the disease, whereas CRP was not different between both groups throughout the whole observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of PCT concentrations during multiple organ dysfunction syndrome provides more information about the severity and the course of the disease than that of CRP. Regarding the strong association of PCT and the respective score systems in future studies we recommend evaluation also of the severity of inflammation and MODS when PCT concentrations were compared between different types of disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vincent, J. L., Moreno, R., Takala, J., Willatts, S., De Mendonça, A., Bruining, H., Reinhart, C. K., Suter, P. M., & Thijs, L. G. (1996) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf01709751 · Cited by 11,674
Cited by
New Approaches to Sepsis: Molecular Diagnostics and Biomarkers
Reinhart, K., Bauer, M., Riedemann, N. C., & Hartog, C. S. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00016-12 · Cited by 533
Comparison of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as markers of sepsis
Luzzani, A., Polati, E., Dorizzi, R., Rungatscher, A., Pavan, R., & Merlini, A. (2003) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000063440.19188.ed · Cited by 425
Castelli, G. P., Pognani, C., Meisner, M., Stuani, A., Bellomi, D., & Sgarbi, L. (2004) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc2877 · Cited by 417
Self-citationHochreiter, M., Köhler, T., Schweiger, A. M., Keck, F. S., Bein, B., von Spiegel, T., & Schroeder, S. (2009) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc7903 · Cited by 315
Schroeder, S., Hochreiter, M., Koehler, T., Schweiger, A.-M., Bein, B., Keck, F. S., & von Spiegel, T. (2009) · Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00423-008-0432-1 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Meisner, M., Tschaikowsky, K., Palmaers, T., & Schmidt, J.
- Venue
- Critical Care
- Published
- 1999-03-16
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-50
- ISSN
- 1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1567584890
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) plasma concentrations at different SOFA scores during the course of sepsis and MODS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/cc306
- The paper
- Meisner, M., Tschaikowsky, K., Palmaers, T., & Schmidt, J. (1999). Comparison of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) plasma concentrations at different SOFA scores during the course of sepsis and MODS. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.