Electronic patient record use during ward rounds: a qualitative study of interaction between medical staff
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Electronic patient records are becoming more common in critical care. As their design and implementation are optimized for single users rather than for groups, we aimed to understand the differences in interaction between members of a multidisciplinary team during ward rounds using an electronic, as opposed to paper, patient medical record. Methods: A qualitative study of morning ward rounds of an intensive care unit that triangulates data from video-based interaction analysis, observation, and interviews. Results: Our analysis demonstrates several difficulties the ward round team faced when interacting with each other using the electronic record compared with the paper one. The physical setup of the technology may impede the consultant's ability to lead the ward round and may prevent other clinical staff from contributing to discussions. Conclusions: We discuss technical and social solutions for minimizing the impact of introducing an electronic patient record, emphasizing the need to balance both. We note that awareness of the effects of technology can enable ward-round teams to adapt their formations and information sources to facilitate multidisciplinary communication during the ward round.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This study has also added to an emerging but limited UK evidence base that has reported potential negative impacts of electronic records on the doctor-patient relationship and patient safety in secondary care.
“This study has also added to an emerging but limited UK evidence base that has reported potential negative impacts of electronic records on the doctor-patient relationship [35] and patient safety in secondary care [36–38].”
From Exploring the implementation of an electronic record into a maternity unit: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory (2017) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 71
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kendon A Conduction Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in focused encounters 1990 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Authors
- Morrison, C., Jones, M., Blackwell, A., & Vuylsteke, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Vuylsteke, Alain
- Venue
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2008-11-24
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- R148-R148
- ISSN
- 1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2646311
- OpenAlex
- W1998106397
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Critical Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
- Keywords
- electronic health records, ward rounds, multidisciplinary team communication, intensive care unit, paper medical records, clinical interaction, technology design
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Computers, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Interviews as Topic, Medical Staff, Hospital, Patient Care Team, Patients' Rooms, Videotape Recording, Medical Records Systems, Computerized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review