Cited by 71Electronic Health Records SystemsNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring

Electronic patient record use during ward rounds: a qualitative study of interaction between medical staff

Open access
Morrison, Cecily, Jones, Matthew, Blackwell, Alan, Vuylsteke, Alain·2008·Critical Care

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic patient records are becoming more common in critical care. As their design and implementation are optimized for single users rather than for groups, we aimed to understand the differences in interaction between members of a multidisciplinary team during ward rounds using an electronic, as opposed to paper, patient medical record. Methods: A qualitative study of morning ward rounds of an intensive care unit that triangulates data from video-based interaction analysis, observation, and interviews. Results: Our analysis demonstrates several difficulties the ward round team faced when interacting with each other using the electronic record compared with the paper one. The physical setup of the technology may impede the consultant's ability to lead the ward round and may prevent other clinical staff from contributing to discussions. Conclusions: We discuss technical and social solutions for minimizing the impact of introducing an electronic patient record, emphasizing the need to balance both. We note that awareness of the effects of technology can enable ward-round teams to adapt their formations and information sources to facilitate multidisciplinary communication during the ward round.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/cc7134

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 71

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kendon A Conduction Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in focused encounters 1990 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Authors
Morrison, C., Jones, M., Blackwell, A., & Vuylsteke, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Vuylsteke, Alain
Venue
Critical Care
Published
2008-11-24
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
R148-R148
ISSN
1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998106397
Cited by
71
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Keywords
electronic health records, ward rounds, multidisciplinary team communication, intensive care unit, paper medical records, clinical interaction, technology design
MeSH terms
Attitude to Computers, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Interviews as Topic, Medical Staff, Hospital, Patient Care Team, Patients' Rooms, Videotape Recording, Medical Records Systems, Computerized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review