Evaluation of pathogen detection from clinical samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction using a sepsis pathogen DNA detection kit
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Sepsis is a serious medical condition that requires rapidly administered, appropriate antibiotic treatment. Conventional methods take three or more days for final pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We organized a prospective observational multicenter study in three study sites to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and potential clinical utility of the Septi Fast system, a multiplex pathogen detection system used in the clinical setting to support early diagnosis of bloodstream infections. Methods: A total of 212 patients, suspected of having systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) caused by bacterial or fungal infection, were enrolled in the study. From these patients, 407 blood samples were taken and blood culture analysis was performed to identify pathogens. Whole blood was also collected for DNA Detection Kit analysis immediately after its collection for blood culture. The results of the DNA Detection Kit, blood culture and other culture tests were compared. The chosen antimicrobial treatment in patients whose samples tested positive in the DNA Detection Kit and/or blood culture analysis was examined to evaluate the effect of concomitant antibiotic exposure on the results of these analyses. Results: Septi Fast analysis gave a positive result for 55 samples, while 43 samples were positive in blood culture analysis. The DNA Detection Kit identified a pathogen in 11.3% (45/400) of the samples, compared to 8.0% (32/400) by blood culture analysis. Twenty-three pathogens were detected by Septi Fast only; conversely, this system missed five episodes of clinically significant bacteremia (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 2; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1; Klebsiella spp, 1; Enterococcus faecium, 1). The number of samples that tested positive was significantly increased by combining the result of the blood culture analysis with those of the DNA Detection Kit analysis (P = 0.01). Among antibiotic pre-treated patients (prevalence, 72%), Septi Fast analysis detected more bacteria/fungi, and was less influenced by antibiotic exposure, compared with blood culture analysis (P = 0.02). Conclusions: This rapid multiplex pathogen detection system complemented traditional culture-based methods and offered some added diagnostic value for the timely detection of causative pathogens, particularly in antibiotic pre-treated patients. Adequately designed intervention studies are needed to prove its clinical effectiveness in improving appropriate antibiotic selection and patient outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SeptiFast, which detects DNA of 20 common bacteria and fungi, may be a helpful adjunct to blood cultures for fastidious organisms and may be advantageous in settings where patients are already on antibiotics or have been pretreated.
“SeptiFast, which is able to detect DNA of 20 common bacteria and fungi, may be a helpful adjunct to blood cultures for fastidious organisms and may be advantageous in settings where patients are either already on antibiotics or have been pretreated.65,66”
From Fungal Sepsis: Optimizing Antifungal Therapy in the Critical Care Setting (2011) · cites this paper as [66]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 104
- Authors
- Yanagihara, K., Kitagawa, Y., Tomonaga, M., Tsukasaki, K., Kohno, S., Seki, M., Sugimoto, H., Shimazu, T., Tasaki, O., Matsushima, A., Ikeda, Y., Okamoto, S., Aikawa, N., Hori, S., Obara, H., Ishizaka, A., Hasegawa, N., Takeda, J., Kamihira, S., Sugahara, K., Asari, S., Murata, M., Kobayashi, Y., Ginba, H., Sumiyama, Y., & Kitajima, M.
- Affiliations
- Nagasaki University (JP)
- Keio University (JP)
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- Roche (Japan) (JP)
- Toho University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Yanagihara, Katsunori
- ORCID
- Venue
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2010-08-24
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- R159-R159
- ISSN
- 1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2945143
- OpenAlex
- W2099209328
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Critical Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
- Keywords
- SeptiFast, sepsis, bloodstream infection, bacterial DNA detection, multiplex pathogen detection, blood culture, diagnostic accuracy, bacteremia, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, rapid pathogen detection
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Infections, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Fungal, Humans, Mycoses, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Staphylococcal Infections, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Sepsis, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review