Cited by 175Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Influence of metabolic network structure and function on enzyme evolution

Open access
Vitkup, Dennis, Kharchenko, Peter, Wagner, Andreas·2006·Genome biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most studies of molecular evolution are focused on individual genes and proteins. However, understanding the design principles and evolutionary properties of molecular networks requires a system-wide perspective. In the present work we connect molecular evolution on the gene level with system properties of a cellular metabolic network. In contrast to protein interaction networks, where several previous studies investigated the molecular evolution of proteins, metabolic networks have a relatively well-defined global function. The ability to consider fluxes in a metabolic network allows us to relate the functional role of each enzyme in a network to its rate of evolution. RESULTS: Our results, based on the yeast metabolic network, demonstrate that important evolutionary processes, such as the fixation of single nucleotide mutations, gene duplications, and gene deletions, are influenced by the structure and function of the network. Specifically, central and highly connected enzymes evolve more slowly than less connected enzymes. Also, enzymes carrying high metabolic fluxes under natural biological conditions experience higher evolutionary constraints. Genes encoding enzymes with high connectivity and high metabolic flux have higher chances to retain duplicates in evolution. In contrast to protein interaction networks, highly connected enzymes are no more likely to be essential compared to less connected enzymes. CONCLUSION: The presented analysis of evolutionary constraints, gene duplication, and essentiality demonstrates that the structure and function of a metabolic network shapes the evolution of its enzymes. Our results underscore the need for systems-based approaches in studies of molecular evolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/gb-2006-7-5-r39

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At a molecular level, metabolic flexibility relies on the configuration of metabolic pathways, which are regulated by key metabolic enzymes and transcription factors, many of which interact closely with the mitochondria.

    “At a molecular level, metabolic flexibility relies on the configuration of metabolic pathways, which are regulated by key metabolic enzymes and transcription factors, many of which interact closely with the mitochondria.”
  • Metabolic flexibility modeling can give insight into the evolution of metabolic pathways, demonstrating that genes encoding enzymes with high connectivity and high metabolic flux have a greater chance of conservation and are the most likely sites of metabolic regulation.

    “Finally, metabolic flexibility modeling can give us insight into the evolution of metabolic pathways (291), demonstrating that genes encoding enzymes with high connectivity and high metabolic flux have a greater chance of conservation (12) and are the most likely sites of metabolic regulation (292).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 175

Authors
Vitkup, D., Kharchenko, P., & Wagner, A.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Vitkup, Dennis
Venue
Genome biology
Published
2006-05-09
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
R39-R39
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2169336096
Cited by
175
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
enzyme evolution, metabolic networks, network topology, metabolic flux, gene duplication, gene deletion, evolutionary constraints, essential genes, network connectivity, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, molecular evolution, point mutations
MeSH terms
Enzymes, Models, Biological, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Point Mutation, Evolution, Molecular, Amino Acid Substitution, Gene Duplication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review