Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome sequencing reveals fine scale diversification and reticulation history during speciation in Sus

Open access
Frantz, Laurent AF, Schraiber, Joshua G, Madsen, Ole, Megens, Hendrik-Jan, Bosse, Mirte, Paudel, Yogesh, Semiadi, Gono, Meijaard, Erik, Li, Ning, Crooijmans, Richard PMA, Archibald, Alan L, Slatkin, Montgomery, Schook, Lawrence B, Larson, Greger, Groenen, Martien AM·2013·Genome Biology

Abstract

Background: Elucidating the process of speciation requires an in-depth understanding of the evolutionary history of the species in question. Studies that rely upon a limited number of genetic loci do not always reveal actual evolutionary history, and often confuse inferences related to phylogeny and speciation. Whole-genome data, however, can overcome this issue by providing a nearly unbiased window into the patterns and processes of speciation. In order to reveal the complexity of the speciation process, we sequenced and analyzed the genomes of 10 wild pigs, representing morphologically or geographically well-defined species and subspecies of the genus Sus from insular and mainland Southeast Asia, and one African common warthog. Results: Our data highlight the importance of past cyclical climatic fluctuations in facilitating the dispersal and isolation of populations, thus leading to the diversification of suids in one of the most species-rich regions of the world. Moreover, admixture analyses revealed extensive, intra- and inter-specific gene-flow that explains previous conflicting results obtained from a limited number of loci. We show that these multiple episodes of gene-flow resulted from both natural and human-mediated dispersal. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the importance of past climatic fluctuations and human mediated translocations in driving and complicating the process of speciation in island Southeast Asia. This case study demonstrates that genomics is a powerful tool to decipher the evolutionary history of a genus, and reveals the complexity of the process of speciation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r107

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Frantz, L. A., Schraiber, J. G., Madsen, O., Megens, H.-J., Bosse, M., Paudel, Y., Semiadi, G., Meijaard, E., Li, N., Crooijmans, R. P., Archibald, A. L., Slatkin, M., Schook, L. B., Larson, G., & Groenen, M. A.
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2013-09-26
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
R107-R107
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2155350273
Cited by
174
References
8
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome sequencing reveals fine scale diversification and reticulation history during speciation in Sus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r107
The paper
Frantz, L. A., Schraiber, J. G., Madsen, O., Megens, H.-J., Bosse, M., Paudel, Y., Semiadi, G., Meijaard, E., Li, N., Crooijmans, R. P., Archibald, A. L., Slatkin, M., Schook, L. B., Larson, G., & Groenen, M. A. (2013). Genome sequencing reveals fine scale diversification and reticulation history during speciation in Sus. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.