The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cryptic biodiversity in a changing world
Open accessAbstract
DNA studies are revealing the extent of hidden, or cryptic, biodiversity. Two new studies challenge paradigms about cryptic biodiversity and highlight the importance of adding a historical and biogeographic dimension to biodiversity research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cryptic species as a window into the paradigm shift of the species concept
Fišer, C., Robinson, C. T., & Malard, F. (2018) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14486 · Cited by 574
Cryptic species conservation: a review
Hending, D. (2025) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.13139 · Cited by 113
How taxonomic change influences forecasts of the Linnean shortfall (and what we can do about it)?
Lessa, T., Stropp, J., Hortal, J., & Ladle, R. J. (2024) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.14829 · Cited by 29
Borges, F. O., Guerreiro, M., Santos, C. P., Paula, J. R., & Rosa, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2022.1018766 · Cited by 28
“Moreover, cryptic species can be found in all major terrestrial and aquatic taxa, across the entire latitudinal profile (Beheregaray and Caccone, 2007).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Beheregaray, L. B., & Caccone, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biology
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 9
- ISSN
- 1475-4924 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114442580
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cryptic biodiversity in a changing world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/jbiol60
- The paper
- Beheregaray, L. B., & Caccone, A. (2007). Cryptic biodiversity in a changing world. Journal of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/jbiol60
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
