Cited by 77Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Physical activity monitors to enhance amount of physical activity in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The body of evidence related to the effect of physical activity monitor-based interventions has grown over the recent years. However, the effect of physical activity monitor-based interventions in older adults remains unclear and should be systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to estimate the effect of physical activity monitor-based interventions on physical activity behavior in participants aged 65 and above. Subsequently we explored the effect on body mass index, physical capacity, and health-related quality of life and finally the impact of patient- and intervention characteristics. METHODS: Searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were performed on April 26, 2018. No publication date filters were applied. References of eligible studies were scrutinized and relevant journals were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials and randomized cross-over trials investigating the effect of a physical activity monitor-based intervention on physical activity were included. Studies were included if the mean age of the participants was above 65 years, and participants could walk independently with or without walking aids. The Cochrane handbook was used as a template for extracting data and the RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analysis using Hedges g, were used to pool the study results. The main outcome of this study was physical activity. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies with 2783 participants were included. The median participant age in the studies was 70.5 years, the median percentage of male participants was 42%, and the median baseline daily step count was 5268. Physical activity monitor-based interventions had a moderate effect (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.73) compared to control interventions, corresponding to an average increase of 1297 steps per day in the intervention groups. No impact of patient and intervention characteristics on the effect estimates were found. SHORT CONCLUSION: Low quality of evidence was found for a moderate effect of physical activity monitor-based interventions on physical activity compared with control interventions. More studies with higher research methodology standards are required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42018083648.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s11556-019-0213-6

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the inclusion process
Fig. 1 PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the inclusion processCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Risk of bias summary: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study. +: Low risk of bias,?:Some concerns, %: High risk of bias
Fig. 2 Risk of bias summary: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study. +: Low risk of bias,?:Some concerns, %: High risk of biasCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Risk of bias graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies
Fig. 3 Risk of bias graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studiesCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Random effects meta-analysis with effect of the interventions on physical activity using Hedges g. N: Number of participants; SMD; standardized mean difference. For each study, the diamond represents the standardized mean difference of the intervention effect with the horizontal line representing 95% confidence intervals. The large diamonds represent the pooled standardized mean difference between the intervention groups and the control groups
Fig. 4 Random effects meta-analysis with effect of the interventions on physical activity using Hedges g. N: Number of participants; SMD; standardized mean difference. For each study, the diamond represents the standardized mean difference of the intervention effect with the horizontal line representing 95% confidence intervals. The large diamonds represent the pooled standardized mean difference between the intervention groups and the control groupsCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Summary of random effects meta-analyses with effect of the interventions on secondary outcomes. K: number of studies; N: Number of participants; SMD: standardized mean difference; HRQoL: health-related quality of life. For each analysis, the diamond represents the standardized mean difference of the pooled intervention effect with the horizontal line representing 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 5 Summary of random effects meta-analyses with effect of the interventions on secondary outcomes. K: number of studies; N: Number of participants; SMD: standardized mean difference; HRQoL: health-related quality of life. For each analysis, the diamond represents the standardized mean difference of the pooled intervention effect with the horizontal line representing 95% confidence intervalsCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 77

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Larsen RT, Christensen J, Juhl CB, Andersen HB, Langberg H. Physical activity monitors to enhance the daily amount of physical activity in elderly—a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2018;7:69. · DOI
  2. Higgins G. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 16.5.4 How to include multiple groups from one study. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; 2011.
  3. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2010. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK305057/ . Accessed 26 Jun 2017.
  4. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 10.2 Types of reporting bias and the supporting evidence. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; 2011.

Metadata

Authors
Larsen, R. T., Christensen, J., Juhl, C. B., Andersen, H. B., & Langberg, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Larsen, Rasmus Tolstrup
Venue
European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
Published
2019-05-04
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
7-7
ISSN
  • 1813-7253 (ISSN-L)
  • 1861-6909
OpenAlex
W2943839570
Cited by
77
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Horizon 2020 (690425)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
wearable activity trackers, accelerometer, older adults, physical activity behavior, step count, body mass index, physical capacity, health-related quality of life, physical activity interventions, walking aids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical activity monitors to enhance amount of physical activity in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s11556-019-0213-6
The paper
Larsen, R. T., Christensen, J., Juhl, C. B., Andersen, H. B., & Langberg, H. (2019). Physical activity monitors to enhance amount of physical activity in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-019-0213-6