Functional and/or structural brain changes in response to resistance exercises and resistance training lead to cognitive improvements – a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: During the aging process, physical capabilities (e.g., muscular strength) and cognitive functions (e.g., memory) gradually decrease. Regarding cognitive functions, substantial functional (e.g., compensatory brain activity) and structural changes (e.g., shrinking of the hippocampus) in the brain cause this decline. Notably, growing evidence points towards a relationship between cognition and measures of muscular strength and muscle mass. Based on this emerging evidence, resistance exercises and/or resistance training, which contributes to the preservation and augmentation of muscular strength and muscle mass, may trigger beneficial neurobiological processes and could be crucial for healthy aging that includes preservation of the brain and cognition. Compared with the multitude of studies that have investigated the influence of endurance exercises and/or endurance training on cognitive performance and brain structure, considerably less work has focused on the effects of resistance exercises and/or resistance training. While the available evidence regarding resistance exercise-induced changes in cognitive functions is pooled, the underlying neurobiological processes, such as functional and structural brain changes, have yet to be summarized. Hence, the purpose of this systematic review is to provide an overview of resistance exercise-induced functional and/or structural brain changes that are related to cognitive functions. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search was conducted by two independent researchers across six electronic databases; 5957 records were returned, of which 18 were considered relevant and were analyzed. SHORT CONCLUSION: Based on our analyses, resistance exercises and resistance training evoked substantial functional brain changes, especially in the frontal lobe, which were accompanied by improvements in executive functions. Furthermore, resistance training led to lower white matter atrophy and smaller white matter lesion volumes. However, based on the relatively small number of studies available, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. Hence, future studies are required to investigate the underlying neurobiological mechanisms and to verify whether the positive findings can be confirmed and transferred to other needy cohorts, such as older adults with dementia, sarcopenia and/or dynapenia.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research highlights the importance of resistance and mind-body exercises, such as Tai Chi, for improving cognition.
“While aerobic and endurance training has traditionally recommended to improve cognition, research highlights the importance of resistance and mind-body exercises, such as Tai Chi [411,[424], [425], [426]].”
From Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR) (2025) · cites this paper as [424]
Preliminary evidence suggests similar improvements following resistance training, with participants exhibiting improvements in PFC white matter volume and executive functioning.
“Notably, preliminary evidence suggests similar improvements following resistance training, with participants exhibiting improvements in PFC white matter volume and executive functioning (52).”
From The Role of Exercise in Management of Mental Health Disorders: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 434 · Cited by 349
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [172]The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan 5.3) [Computer program] 2014
- [287]de Groot JC de Leeuw FE Oudkerk M van Gijn J Hofman A Jolles J Breteler MM Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: the Rotterdam scan study Ann Neurol 2000 47 145 151 10665484
- [324]Doré S Kar S Quirion R Rediscovering an old friend, IGF-I: potential use in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases Trends Neurosci 1997 20 326 331 9246719
- Authors
- Herold, F., Törpel, A., Schega, L., & Müller, N. G.
- Affiliations
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Herold, Fabian
- Venue
- European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
- Published
- 2019-07-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-10
- ISSN
- 1813-7253 (ISSN-L)
- 1861-6909
- PMC
- PMC6617693
- OpenAlex
- W2958717882
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 434
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DZNE Pub (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- resistance training, cognitive function, brain structure, brain function, healthy aging, executive function, frontal lobe, white matter atrophy, white matter lesions, hippocampal atrophy, muscle strength, muscle mass, sarcopenia, dynapenia, dementia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review