The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SVM-RFE: selection and visualization of the most relevant features through non-linear kernels
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Support vector machines (SVM) are a powerful tool to analyze data with a number of predictors approximately equal or larger than the number of observations. However, originally, application of SVM to analyze biomedical data was limited because SVM was not designed to evaluate importance of predictor variables. Creating predictor models based on only the most relevant variables is essential in biomedical research. Currently, substantial work has been done to allow assessment of variable importance in SVM models but this work has focused on SVM implemented with linear kernels. The power of SVM as a prediction model is associated with the flexibility generated by use of non-linear kernels. Moreover, SVM has been extended to model survival outcomes. This paper extends the Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) algorithm by proposing three approaches to rank variables based on non-linear SVM and SVM for survival analysis. RESULTS: The proposed algorithms allows visualization of each one the RFE iterations, and hence, identification of the most relevant predictors of the response variable. Using simulation studies based on time-to-event outcomes and three real datasets, we evaluate the three methods, based on pseudo-samples and kernel principal component analysis, and compare them with the original SVM-RFE algorithm for non-linear kernels. The three algorithms we proposed performed generally better than the gold standard RFE for non-linear kernels, when comparing the truly most relevant variables with the variable ranks produced by each algorithm in simulation studies. Generally, the RFE-pseudo-samples outperformed the other three methods, even when variables were assumed to be correlated in all tested scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed approaches can be implemented with accuracy to select variables and assess direction and strength of associations in analysis of biomedical data using SVM for categorical or time-to-event responses. Conducting variable selection and interpreting direction and strength of associations between predictors and outcomes with the proposed approaches, particularly with the RFE-pseudo-samples approach can be implemented with accuracy when analyzing biomedical data. These approaches, perform better than the classical RFE of Guyon for realistic scenarios about the structure of biomedical data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond
Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2001) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4175.001.0001 · Cited by 11,703
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics
Saeys, Y., Inza, I., & Larrañaga, P. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm344 · Cited by 5,244
Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., & Licata, L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013 · Cited by 4,147
Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems
Benders, J. F. (1962) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01386316 · Cited by 3,855
Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods
Scholkopf, B., Mika, S., Burges, C. J. C., Knirsch, P., Muller, K.-R., Ratsch, G., & Smola, A. J. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.788641 · Cited by 1,164
Weston, J., Mukherjee, S., Chapelle, O., Pontil, M., Poggio, T., & Vapnik, V. N. (2000) · Cited by 988
Combining SVMs with Various Feature Selection Strategies
Chen, Y.-W., & Lin, C.-J. (2008) · Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-35488-8_13 · Cited by 980
Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models
Bender, R., Augustin, T., & Blettner, M. (2005) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2059 · Cited by 889
A wrapper method for feature selection using Support Vector Machines
Maldonado, S., & Weber, R. (2009) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.02.014 · Cited by 473
Cited by
Explainable artificial intelligence: a comprehensive review
Minh, D., Wang, H. X., Li, Y. F., & Nguyen, T. N. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-10088-y · Cited by 983
Brahmi, Z., Mahyoob, M., Al-Sarem, M., Algaraady, J., Bousselmi, K., & Alblwi, A. (2024) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s460283 · Cited by 36
Cao, C., Liu, W., Guo, X., Weng, S., Chen, Y., Luo, Y., Wang, S., Zhu, B., Liu, Y., & Peng, D. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1460431 · Cited by 16
Asadpour, V., Puttock, E. J., Getahun, D., Fassett, M. J., & Xie, F. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13577 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanz, H., Valim, C., Vegas, E., Oller, J. M., & Reverter, F.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2018-11-19
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 432-432
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901857397
- Cited by
- 804
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 16.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SVM-RFE: selection and visualization of the most relevant features through non-linear kernels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12859-018-2451-4
- The paper
- Sanz, H., Valim, C., Vegas, E., Oller, J. M., & Reverter, F. (2018). SVM-RFE: selection and visualization of the most relevant features through non-linear kernels. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2451-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.