Predicting adverse drug reactions of combined medication from heterogeneous pharmacologic databases
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Early and accurate identification of potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for combined medication is vital for public health. Existing methods either rely on expensive wet-lab experiments or detecting existing associations from related records. Thus, they inevitably suffer under-reporting, delays in reporting, and inability to detect ADRs for new and rare drugs. The current application of machine learning methods is severely impeded by the lack of proper drug representation and credible negative samples. Therefore, a method to represent drugs properly and to select credible negative samples becomes vital in applying machine learning methods to this problem. RESULTS: In this work, we propose a machine learning method to predict ADRs of combined medication from pharmacologic databases by building up highly-credible negative samples (HCNS-ADR). Specifically, we fuse heterogeneous information from different databases and represent each drug as a multi-dimensional vector according to its chemical substructures, target proteins, substituents, and related pathways first. Then, a drug-pair vector is obtained by appending the vector of one drug to the other. Next, we construct a drug-disease-gene network and devise a scoring method to measure the interaction probability of every drug pair via network analysis. Drug pairs with lower interaction probability are preferentially selected as negative samples. Following that, the validated positive samples and the selected credible negative samples are projected into a lower-dimensional space using the principal component analysis. Finally, a classifier is built for each ADR using its positive and negative samples with reduced dimensions. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated on simulative prediction for 1276 ADRs and 1048 drugs, comparing using four machine learning algorithms and with two baseline approaches. Extensive experiments show that the proposed way to represent drugs characterizes drugs accurately. With highly-credible negative samples selected by HCNS-ADR, the four machine learning algorithms achieve significant performance improvements. HCNS-ADR is also shown to be able to predict both known and novel drug-drug-ADR associations, outperforming two other baseline approaches significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that integration of different drug properties to represent drugs are valuable for ADR prediction of combined medication and the selection of highly-credible negative samples can significantly improve the prediction performance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Medication/drug topics present an underrepresented area, with only two papers being published in this field.
“Medication/drug topics present an underrepresented area, with only two papers being published in this field50,66.”
From Multimodal machine learning in precision health: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [66]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 33
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [12]Yang CC Jiang L Yang H Tang X Detecting signals of adverse drug reactions from health consumer contributed content in social media Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Health Informatics 2012 Beijing ACM
- Authors
- Zheng, Y., Peng, H., Zhang, X., Zhao, Z., Yin, J., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Jinyan
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- S19
- Pages
- 517-517
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6311930
- OpenAlex
- W2907367312
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Technology Sydney
- China Scholarship Council (201503170244)
- Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Keywords
- adverse drug reactions, drug representation, negative sample selection, heterogeneous data fusion, interaction probability, chemical substructures, protein targets, drug pathways
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Drug Interactions, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Models, Statistical, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Gene Regulatory Networks, Databases, Pharmaceutical, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review