Deep convolutional neural networks for mammography: advances, challenges and applications
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The limitations of traditional computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for mammography, the extreme importance of early detection of breast cancer and the high impact of the false diagnosis of patients drive researchers to investigate deep learning (DL) methods for mammograms (MGs). Recent breakthroughs in DL, in particular, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved remarkable advances in the medical fields. Specifically, CNNs are used in mammography for lesion localization and detection, risk assessment, image retrieval, and classification tasks. CNNs also help radiologists providing more accurate diagnosis by delivering precise quantitative analysis of suspicious lesions. RESULTS: In this survey, we conducted a detailed review of the strengths, limitations, and performance of the most recent CNNs applications in analyzing MG images. It summarizes 83 research studies for applying CNNs on various tasks in mammography. It focuses on finding the best practices used in these research studies to improve the diagnosis accuracy. This survey also provides a deep insight into the architecture of CNNs used for various tasks. Furthermore, it describes the most common publicly available MG repositories and highlights their main features and strengths. CONCLUSIONS: The mammography research community can utilize this survey as a basis for their current and future studies. The given comparison among common publicly available MG repositories guides the community to select the most appropriate database for their application(s). Moreover, this survey lists the best practices that improve the performance of CNNs including the pre-processing of images and the use of multi-view images. In addition, other listed techniques like transfer learning (TL), data augmentation, batch normalization, and dropout are appealing solutions to reduce overfitting and increase the generalization of the CNN models. Finally, this survey identifies the research challenges and directions that require further investigations by the community.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
End-to-end convolutional neural networks have dominated performance at diverse medical imaging tasks.
“Motivated by the dominant performance of CNNs, it is desirable to develop an end-to-end network for automatic placental maturity grading (PMG) from ultrasound images.”
From DilatedFormer: dilated granularity transformer network for placental maturity grading in ultrasound (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
The Background says CNNs achieve higher detection accuracy than conventional CAD models for mammography. Results > CNNs best practices says end-to-end methods perform better than multi-stage methods for mammograms when trained on large datasets. These passages support the motivation for using CNNs, but not a general claim that end-to-end CNNs dominate performance across diverse medical imaging tasks; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredConvolutional neural networks have been used successfully in medical imaging applications including mammography, brain imaging, and prostate cancer detection.
“They have been used successfully in a variety of medical imaging applications, including mammography [15], brain imaging [16], and prostate cancer detection [17].”
From DilatedFormer: dilated granularity transformer network for placental maturity grading in ultrasound (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 151 · Cited by 274
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- [38]Lopez MG, Posada N, Moura DC, Pollán RR, Valiente JMF, Ortega CS, et al.BCDR: a breast cancer digital repository. In: 15th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics: 2012.
- [67]Domingues I, Cardoso J. Mass detection on mammogram images: a first assessment of deep learning techniques. In: 19th Portuguese Conference on Pattern Recognition (RECPAD).2013.
- [85]Mishkin D, Sergievskiy N, Matas J. Systematic evaluation of CNN advances on the ImageNet. 2016. arXiv preprint. arXiv:160602228.
- [91]Abdelhafiz D, Nabavi S, Ammar R, Yang C. The Effect of Pre-Processing on Breast Cancer Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks. In: Poster session presented at the meeting of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. Washington DC: 2018.
- [113]Maas AL, Hannun AY, Ng AY. Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In: Proc icml. vol. 30.2013. p. 3.
- [119]Carneiro G, Nascimento J, Bradley AP. CHAPTER OUTLINE. Deep Learn Med Image Anal. 2017;:321.
- [124]Yosinski J, Clune J, Bengio Y, Lipson H. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In: Advances in neural information processing systems.2014. p. 3320–8.
- [141]Abadi M, Barham P, Chen J, Chen Z, Davis A, Dean J, et al.TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning. In: OSDI. vol. 16.2016. p. 265–83.
- Authors
- Abdelhafiz, D., Yang, C., Ammar, R., & Nabavi, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- UConn Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Abdelhafiz, Dina
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- S11
- Pages
- 281-281
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6551243
- OpenAlex
- W2948732750
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 151
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 14.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Connecticut
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- mammography, convolutional neural networks, breast cancer detection, computer-aided detection, lesion localization, breast cancer risk prediction, transfer learning, data augmentation, batch normalization, dropout, overfitting, multi-view images, image preprocessing
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Mammography, Publications, Surveys and Questionnaires, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review