Cited by 133Computational Drug Discovery MethodsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

A learning-based method for drug-target interaction prediction based on feature representation learning and deep neural network

Open access
Peng, Jiajie, Li, Jingyi, Shang, Xuequn·2020·BMC Bioinformatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drug-target interaction prediction is of great significance for narrowing down the scope of candidate medications, and thus is a vital step in drug discovery. Because of the particularity of biochemical experiments, the development of new drugs is not only costly, but also time-consuming. Therefore, the computational prediction of drug target interactions has become an essential way in the process of drug discovery, aiming to greatly reducing the experimental cost and time. RESULTS: We propose a learning-based method based on feature representation learning and deep neural network named DTI-CNN to predict the drug-target interactions. We first extract the relevant features of drugs and proteins from heterogeneous networks by using the Jaccard similarity coefficient and restart random walk model. Then, we adopt a denoising autoencoder model to reduce the dimension and identify the essential features. Third, based on the features obtained from last step, we constructed a convolutional neural network model to predict the interaction between drugs and proteins. The evaluation results show that the average AUROC score and AUPR score of DTI-CNN were 0.9416 and 0.9499, which obtains better performance than the other three existing state-of-the-art methods. CONCLUSIONS: All the experimental results show that the performance of DTI-CNN is better than that of the three existing methods and the proposed method is appropriately designed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12859-020-03677-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prediction of drug-target interactions in small-molecule drug discovery is largely driven by significant improvement in the performance of computational methods.

    “This is analogous to small-molecule drug discovery, where computational methods have already made significant inroads [5,6]; prediction of drug-target interactions in particular is largely driven by the significant improvement in the performance of computational methods.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 133

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Niwattanakul S, Singthongchai J, Naenudorn E, Wanapu S. Using of jaccard coefficient for keywords similarity. In: Proceedings of the International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists: 2013. p. 380–4.
  2. [27]Ramachandran P, Zoph B, Le Q, Quoc V. Searching for activation functions.arXiv e-prints. 2017. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv171005941R. Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System.

Authors
Peng, J., Li, J., & Shang, X.
Affiliations
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Shang, Xuequn
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2020-09
Volume
21
Issue
S13
Pages
394-394
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3085429933
Cited by
133
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Northwestern University
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1811262, 61702421, 61772426)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (U1811262)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M610651)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
drug-target interaction prediction, feature representation learning, convolutional neural networks, heterogeneous networks, Jaccard similarity, denoising autoencoder, dimensionality reduction, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Drug Development, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review