Cited by 39Machine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic Networksvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

A multitask transfer learning framework for the prediction of virus-human protein–protein interactions

Open access
Dong, Thi Ngan, Brogden, Graham, Gerold, Gisa, Khosla, Megha·2021·BMC Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Viral infections are causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Understanding the interaction patterns between a particular virus and human proteins plays a crucial role in unveiling the underlying mechanism of viral infection and pathogenesis. This could further help in prevention and treatment of virus-related diseases. However, the task of predicting protein–protein interactions between a new virus and human cells is extremely challenging due to scarce data on virus-human interactions and fast mutation rates of most viruses. Results: We developed a multitask transfer learning approach that exploits the information of around 24 million protein sequences and the interaction patterns from the human interactome to counter the problem of small training datasets. Instead of using hand-crafted protein features, we utilize statistically rich protein representations learned by a deep language modeling approach from a massive source of protein sequences. Additionally, we employ an additional objective which aims to maximize the probability of observing human protein–protein interactions. This additional task objective acts as a regularizer and also allows to incorporate domain knowledge to inform the virus-human protein–protein interaction prediction model. Conclusions: Our approach achieved competitive results on 13 benchmark datasets and the case study for the SARS-CoV-2 virus receptor. Experimental results show that our proposed model works effectively for both virus-human and bacteria-human protein–protein interaction prediction tasks. We share our code for reproducibility and future research at https://git.l3s.uni-hannover.de/dong/multitask-transfer .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12859-021-04484-y

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Dong, T. N., Brogden, G., Gerold, G., & Khosla, M.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (DE)
Corresponding author
Dong, Thi Ngan
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2021-11-27
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
572-572
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3216980854
Cited by
39
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • VolkswagenStiftung’s initiative “Niedersächsisches Vorab” (11-76251-99-3/19 (ZN3434))
  • Niedersächsisches Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01DD20003)
  • Niedersächsische Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur (MWK, project 76251-99)
  • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
protein-protein interaction prediction, human interactome, SARS-CoV-2 receptor, limited training data
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Algorithms, Humans, Viruses, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review